Jump to content

If I have physical relations before getting married does it still count as a kurhet?


Guest Singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Singh

I was just wondering this...

the rehat maryada states that one of the chaar bujjar kurhets is adultry - you have to be married to commit this. Let’s say a singh wasn’t married, took Amrit at a young age and has a physical relation with someone, does he still have to go pesh?...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/1/2018 at 10:55 PM, Guest Singh said:

I was just wondering this...

the rehat maryada states that one of the chaar bujjar kurhets is adultry - you have to be married to commit this. Let’s say a singh wasn’t married, took Amrit at a young age and has a physical relation with someone, does he still have to go pesh?...

bro
what did the Panj tell you about relationships with females ? did they tell you to have girlfriends, date , etc or did they tell you to refrain from relationships with any female before marriage then afterwards only with your wife ?

The answer is there, Panj are respresentative of Guru ji in sanchar so what they tell  you take as instruction from Guru ji , if you went against their words then I would say you need to talk to them again and take the prescribed punishment . It is not just adultry but extra marital relations i.e. outside marriage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/1/2018 at 11:55 PM, Guest Singh said:

I was just wondering this...

the rehat maryada states that one of the chaar bujjar kurhets is adultry - you have to be married to commit this. Let’s say a singh wasn’t married, took Amrit at a young age and has a physical relation with someone, does he still have to go pesh?...

Non marital physical relations are forbidden, as per Maharaj’s Mukti Nama. Maharajh Ji says, that anyone having pre marital or extra marital physical relations, is no Sikh of mine...

WHeguru...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I have physical relations before getting married does it still count as a kurhet?

It is  definetely bujjar kurhet, whether before, during, or after marriage, having physical relations with other than one´s spouse only.

It is quite evident that as per the present picture of the world in general, "kaam" is viewed as something attractive and harmless.

It is the most powerful vikar through which even devtays, rishis, have fallen due  to its influence on them.

It is not easy to stay away from its tentacles, as at all levels in our daily lives, we see it moving around us, in scenes, such as newspapers, jokes,  conversations, magazines, televison, films,  messages, etc.

But if we are  true sikhs, we should be so much absorbed in His bhakti/simran/Gurbani/keertan, katha, paath, at all times, that this maya, and her servants vikars, dare not come near us.

Ekas(Wahiguru) bin sabh dandh hae.

Stay blessed.

Sat Sree Akal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ignore the translation, the exact rehat is not to do "par istree da sang", meaning not to have sexual relations with a woman that is not yours/someone else's. The only way that a woman can be considered yours and not "par istree" is if you have had Anand karaj to her. So yes sex with anyone that is not your wife (whether you are married or not) is a bajjar kurehit. The moment this has taken place, a person ceases to be a Sikh and Guru Sahib's hand is no longer on that person's head. Such a person no longer has any rishta with Guru Sahib any more and they must confess this bajjar kurehit to the Panj pyare, accept and carry out the punishment given to them and re-receive Amrit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
Guest Anonymous

I’m just a Sahajdhari Sikh not an Amritdhari, I dated few guys long back before I got married & indulged into several times physical relations with few,  at different phase of life during getting to know them. Till finally I dated the guy who meant to be my present husband & even then we had several pre-maritial intimacy too before we finally got married. I know those acts were absolutely wrong  no matter in which religions we are & I feel bad sometimes when I think back.  And today only I cross through this topic about Pesh. I have no idea what that means till I read bit today. I have shallow knowledge of Sikhi but I still try to practise Nitnem more. So what shall I do to compensate my past sins? Even for my husband too,  if he has done with me or any others in his past? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An amritdhari has to pesh when he/she commits a bujjer kurehit. You dont uave to worry about that

even when/if you take amrit you dont have to divulge your past actions

other than that, your personal feelings or guilt is between you and maharaj. Continue building your jeevan, nitnem and do ardas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/6/2020 at 9:55 PM, Guest Anonymous said:

I’m just a Sahajdhari Sikh not an Amritdhari, I dated few guys long back before I got married & indulged into several times physical relations with few,  at different phase of life during getting to know them. Till finally I dated the guy who meant to be my present husband & even then we had several pre-maritial intimacy too before we finally got married. I know those acts were absolutely wrong  no matter in which religions we are & I feel bad sometimes when I think back.  And today only I cross through this topic about Pesh. I have no idea what that means till I read bit today. I have shallow knowledge of Sikhi but I still try to practise Nitnem more. So what shall I do to compensate my past sins? Even for my husband too,  if he has done with me or any others in his past? 

Well theres obviously no going back now. What you can do is make your nitnem solid and do it everyday   and also do waheguru simran, you can do simran while working, cooking etc

Waheguru made you a sikh in this life so it's your duty to fulfill that. Waheguru is our father  and we must obey his hukham   that's the purpose of our life 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/1/2018 at 11:55 PM, Guest Singh said:

I was just wondering this...

the rehat maryada states that one of the chaar bujjar kurhets is adultry - you have to be married to commit this. Let’s say a singh wasn’t married, took Amrit at a young age and has a physical relation with someone, does he still have to go pesh?...

You have to go for pesh if you have a relationship outside marriage. That basically means that having a boyfriend/girlfriend relationship is a kuhrehit. It’s different to finding someone to marry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use