Jump to content

This Pic of Guru Gobind Singh ji is copied from Jesus ?


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 2 years later...

That's the problem with art. If done well it allows you to connect with an 'intention' or 'feeling'. But at other times it just makes you question things... When it comes to art and religion I'm always reminded of this scene from Malcolm X

Art can be a form of propoganda, to distract and mislead followers.

But then you have art that connects with you

machhiwara_bhagatsingh.jpg

https://www.sikhiart.com/product/guru-gobind-singh-ji-machhiwara/ 

Art like this of guru ji in machhiwara represent what it might have been like and often allows me to relate to those times in our history 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, imhosingh said:

That's the problem with art. If done well it allows you to connect with an 'intention' or 'feeling'. But at other times it just makes you question things... When it comes to art and religion I'm always reminded of this scene from Malcolm X

Art can be a form of propoganda, to distract and mislead followers.

But then you have art that connects with you

machhiwara_bhagatsingh.jpg

https://www.sikhiart.com/product/guru-gobind-singh-ji-machhiwara/ 

Art like this of guru ji in machhiwara represent what it might have been like and often allows me to relate to those times in our history 

 

 

 

Lets not forget

 

 

Screenshot_20210202-012514_YouTube.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Redoptics said:

Lets not forget

 

 

Screenshot_20210202-012514_YouTube.jpg

Yep, always found it odd how the representations of our gurus always had fair skin and 'unwrinkled' completions . They all had tough lives, travelled far and wide, spent most of their time outside...they would look more like the nihangs you see near anandpur sahib.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, imhosingh said:

Yep, always found it odd how the representations of our gurus always had fair skin and 'unwrinkled' completions . They all had tough lives, travelled far and wide, spent most of their time outside...they would look more like the nihangs you see near anandpur sahib.

Now im seeing Guru Nanak Ji with blue eyes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Arsh1469 said:

How can it be a self portrait. He drew it when he was 20 or 30 as he was born in 1901 and drew it in the early 1900s people need to stop spreading false info without doing research.

wrong he was born 1901 but the painting was made in 1969 ,for the 500th anniversary, making him 68 try again. Look at the lower half of the face same , slightly altered eyes angles but both have hooded eyes . Why so scared of the truth?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use