No Coconuts in SIkhi

[vtheawesome]

4 hours ago, Punjabiwolves said:

LOL. Sikhism will have elements of Hinduism as its a Dharmic faith along with Jainism, Buddhism.   There is nothing wrong with having elements similar to Hinduism in Sikhism.

This.
We have to keep in mind that many faiths have nuggets of truth in them. Some more so than others. Some may have only 20% of it, others 80%, but they all still have some element of truth to them. It would be frankly idiotic to abandon practices in Sikhi because they appear similar to a different faiths practice.
That said I do understand the ever present threat of Sikhi being saffronised. I understand that we cannot let our faith be diluted and destroyed, but we also have to keep a level head about these things.

[mahandulai]

On 9/18/2018 at 5:48 PM, jkvlondon said:

Please listen and realise just how deep the attack by brahmins runs ...

 

as a coconut i would like to know what he is saying

[Akalifauj]

On 9/18/2018 at 9:48 AM, jkvlondon said:

Please listen and realise just how deep the attack by brahmins runs ...

 

There is no Panth maryada. And mostly all sampardas were contacted about making a Panth maryada but they left because the basic maryada given by Sri Guru Gobind Singh ji was not being written in the so called Sikh Rehat Maryada.  This fake doctor of Sikhi says the jathas would have left because what they were suggestion would have been against gurmat.  The groups were tell the committee to make Jap ji sahib, Jaap sahib, tvad Prasad swaiyve, chaupai sahib, and Anand Sahib as the requirement for a sikhs ni tnem in the morning.  The committee refused and the groups wanted nothing to do with people that do not even accept Sri Guru Gobind Singh ji nitnem Banis in the morning.  The groups left because Gurmat was not being followed. 

[Akalifauj]

This guy is allergic too all symbolism.

He says Shabads is what Sri Guru Nanak dev ji gave to Sri Guru Angad dev ji and not a coconut.  Apply the same logic to chaur sahib.  Brahmins used the chaur sahib and they waved it over the idols.  So in this case we are wrong as well to wave chaur sahib over Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji because the chaur are the trees and wind.  Also no more raising Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji on a takht (higher platform) because Gurbani is always the highest, we all know this. Also Sri Guru Gobind Singh ji said he is the Guru and the chela.  So if the chela (Sikh) can sit on the floor than so can the Guru.  Why would the Guru ask for a higher platform?  See the ignorance?  So there is no end to the mindless and manmat jargon these guys will come up with.