Jump to content
mahandulai

What if you had the cure to cancer?

Recommended Posts

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Make knowledge of it publicly available.

Find some way to make it a public domain type thing. I think copywriting or selling something like that would be wrong.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, vtheawesome said:

Make knowledge of it publicly available.

Find some way to make it a public domain type thing. I think copywriting or selling something like that would be wrong.

 

agreed would be wrong to profit on something that can cure someone''s life.  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would  internet bomb the news so no one nation owned the cure and also spread it via free clinics through our worldwide gurdwara network  so people on the ground could learn and pass it on . The Big Pharma model needs to go down . Power to the meek of the world all 99 percent

Edited by jkvlondon
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

I would  internet bomb the news so no one nation owned the cure and also spread it via free clinics through our worldwide gurdwara network  so people on the ground could learn and pass it on . The Big Pharma model needs to go down . Power to the meek of the world all 99 percent

power from the bottom up, has no direction, ji

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, mahandulai said:

power from the bottom up, has no direction, ji

you obviously know nothing about the power of the masses ...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jkvlondon said:

you obviously know nothing about the power of the masses ...

the masses don't have the confidence otherwise they would not be the masses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, mahandulai said:

the masses don't have the confidence otherwise they would not be the masses.

you sound so lacking ....when you open your mouth  ...even enlightened masses would remain the masses because of numerical count .... the leaders/elite are only there on the tolerance of the masses ...when that goes no one stands in their place

Edited by jkvlondon
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
3 hours ago, mahandulai said:

the masses don't have the confidence otherwise they would not be the masses.

U the guy who made those vlogs on YouTube? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/15/2018 at 12:13 PM, Punjabiwolves said:

agreed would be wrong to profit on something that can cure someone''s life.  

Then there is no incentive to make the cure in the first place.

Why become a scientist and study/research for years when in the end, you will get nothing out of it (aside from I guess moral upliftment).

These people have families to feed as well.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, FreshMind13 said:

Then there is no incentive to make the cure in the first place.

Why become a scientist and study/research for years when in the end, you will get nothing out of it (aside from I guess moral upliftment).

These people have families to feed as well.

fact there have been many doctors who have cured and then been attacked and chased by the US government and others in the pocket of Big Pharma , Dr Stanley Burzynski is one of the latest . Do you not find it strange that in 100 years of modern medicine , 70 years in active fully funded search mode they haven't found the cure/s and haven't progressed much further than cut, burn, poison method?

you can check out the story : http://www.burzynskimovie.com/

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you had the cure to 'cancer' you'd better start work on a cure to dementia, Alzheimers , arthritis, atherosclerosis and all the other ailments associated with old age. I read a good article once about how the success of modern medicine has not actually over the whole of a persons life improved the 'quality of life ' much when you factor in the years of life at the end when you are afflicted with such conditions 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, imhosingh said:

If you had the cure to 'cancer' you'd better start work on a cure to dementia, Alzheimers , arthritis, atherosclerosis and all the other ailments associated with old age. I read a good article once about how the success of modern medicine has not actually over the whole of a persons life improved the 'quality of life ' much when you factor in the years of life at the end when you are afflicted with such conditions 

alzheimers is diabetes type 3  - controlling sugars in diet will help , also medical fasting

Increased sugars in diet leads to insulin resistance which then causes mutliple issues that you have listed including high blood pressure , high cholestrol etc and also it increases rate of aging  and radical oxidative damage ( as the processing of sugars by the body uses vitamin, antioxidant and mineral reserves )

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I"m not picking on anybody,  I asked a question,  "a great connection to your self identity and individuality", I assumed we are supposed to let go of our individuality.
    • Anything that fans our ego is not good for us.  Name doesn't have to add to our ego, instead it can provide us inspiration, in which case it is a good thing, and can become "a great connection to your self identity and individuality" as claimed by the Singhni in question.  Throughout our history, our Gurus have given new names to many Sikhs to inspire them, and these people went on to become model Sikhs.  We must remember that oneness and equality doesn't mean uniformity.  Gurus and saints have wanted people to be "Nirale" -- Tyrants have wanted people to be uniform.  Unless you know for sure that Singhni in question is on an ego trip because of her name, why pick on her?   Waheguru ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru ji Fateh
    • So I was on linked in today, one of my connection a Sikhni with phagg, so she looks like a follower of Sikhi, had a post 'the importance of your name' wherein she goes on and quote "Your name is often your greatest connection to your self identity and individuality." I responded with, quote " why get caught up on ones name? Are we not supposed to get rid of attachment? Such as 'self identity' or 'ego'. She then replied with quote "That's another view on it - thank you for sharing your thoughts. For many of us it's about courtesy and showing each other respect." It got me thinking are we now in situation, where we think we know better than the teachings of Guru Granth Sahib Ji? Or am I making a mountain out of a mole hill. Would like some other people's thoughts on it. Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh
    • haha , ok bro point noted . 
    • Why are you fishing for respect? If it doesn't come naturally to them, is it really worth anything if it needs to be demanded? See, that's the kind of mentality that a banda wouldn't give two hoots about in all honesty. Obsessing over such trivialities is a female trait. Is your mother putting these thoughts and perceived micro-aggressions into your head? Stop it. It's not a respectable form of behaviour. It makes you seem weak. Don't get so familiar with your in-laws. Be polite, be honourable and respectful, but don't talk about nonsense like you've mentioned. It's embarrassing, bro. Maintain a respectful distance.
×

Important Information

Terms of Use