Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
singhunit

Ringleader Dhaliwal

Recommended Posts

Dhaliwal lol

These people are a discrace and give all Sikhs a bad name. 

Its good he does not have Singh as his name. That would have beeen even more embarrassing.

He is a dhaliwal. Basically a nobody and a loser. This way he has shamed his family name and not Singh name given to us. 

By Our Guru.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not that he's a paki but dhaliwal is a paki surname too. There was this paki Punjabi jatt lady who lived opposite us and her family name was dhaliwal

A bit like how some sikhs have malik as their surname 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"One of the victims in Huddersfield was Asian - something that also happened cases such as Rochdale and Newcastle, but is not often reported by the media.

The ringleader, Amere Singh Dhaliwal, converted to Sikhism after the abuse. He wears a turban, carried a kirpan in it and swore on the Guru Granth Sahib before taking to the witness stand. Raj Singh Barsran, who hosted many of the 'parties' in his house, is also a Sikh."

https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/news/news-opinion/grooming-gangs-islamophobia-edl-robinson-15294888

===============================

It appears he wasn't Sikh before he got charged then after getting charged with the crimes he converted to Sikh during that time. Maybe a disturbing sinister move on his part to deflect attention from his original community or maybe genuine feeling of remorse and reform and wanting a fresh start and new ideology/religion to follow.

Until we learn more about this guys background we can't really say. But all I can say about this disgusting crimes is glad these people got caught and paying for their crimes. At least the Sikh community even if they are rarely from our community we  actively condemn these people and see these people as scumbags that they are.

Also majority of Sex offenders as the link above shows are white and black christian/atheist males and majority (over 90%) of these convicted offenders in sex grooming offenses are overwhelmingly of Muslim heritage origin.

Its interesting how the racist white mainstream media fails to mention the asian female victims and calls out "asian sex gangs targeting white girls" but never calls out the colour of white pedo sex gangs or black rape gangs as proved by stats they have the highest gang rape convictions. Yet they have the hypocrisy of attacking people like truth tellers like  tommy robinson (who isn't even saying anything racist! he is just anti-islam). He just calls a spade a spade and says its a muslim sex gang problem because of islamic teachings and in his own area has witnessed the islamification and aggression against non-muslims by muslims. Sikh and hindu girls are victimsed by muslim sex and conversion gangs too our people have witnessed it all too since the 1980s but our communities victims don't matter to the closet racists elites in the British establishment.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, puzzled said:

Not that he's a paki but dhaliwal is a paki surname too. There was this paki Punjabi jatt lady who lived opposite us and her family name was dhaliwal

A bit like how some sikhs have malik as their surname 

Come on. We should all know by now. Hordes of Juts of Panjab converted to Islam but the majority of these hide their surnames with an Islamic one but a small number still retain their gotra. I met quite a few growing up in East London. 

Anyway, I wonder what made this guy keep his kesh given his proclivities? Maybe it was a way of deflecting?

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

I think that was Sangh, who is from the same town? Is he still about? 

Amere is not his real name. The address he's given is of a rental property and not of his residence. He is married with children. His dad was a womaniser. His mum and sisters are nothing alike. It's well known that "amere" was a dealer; he worked on a factory floor and drove big cars etc etc flaunting his cash. He was a mona up until he got caught out fiddling with kids. He donned the singh image in an attempt to show reform etc. And now he'll become a Muslim in jail to protect his a$$ quite literally.

"converted to sikh religion". Lord. Why do people read the dailyfail? especially apne lok.

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Hammertime007 said:

Should be beaten then deported scum bag. 

typical white c*** comment.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, S4NGH said:

. He was a mona up until he got caught out fiddling with kids. He donned the singh image in an attempt to show reform etc.

 

Words fail me....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hammertime007 said:

And the comment you have come out with is that of one who sticks up for scum bags. 

for dhaliwal? erm... really

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its common for Sikh,Hindu, and Jains to share a surname with Muslim, like Shah,Patel, Gill, Choudhary etc. as for Jatts they can come across as very lively larger the life personalities, they do love a good time that's for sure. I do get on very well with Jatts. this Amere guy more likely relates more to his up north Pakistani ghetto gang then Sikh  Jatts 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • healthy competition is fine but when you stop talking and get really violent over the joint khoo in the fields and the wall between the houses then that is a serious problem.  its jealousy and greed.   2 men from my mum shreek were about to start a fight with hammers and other farming tools in the fields  luckily my mums brother got there and stopped them.  things get really serious there  yh thaiya chachiya are the worse   they want to hog everything for their own kids,  they ruin the whole joint dynamic of the family.  my thia and chacha fell out and built a wall between their houses, their wives then used to get their kids to argue as well.    lol no joke but one day while my thaye was out, my chachi came around and destroyed my thayis chulla with a sledge hammer!  my thayi then rang us and was crying on the phone and said that she had to ask the neighbors for roti!   like what the hell were we supposed to do all the way from the uk!!!     these women are so venomous towards each other    
    • Yes I am aware of Shareeka.  I guess there is nothing wrong in some healthy competition and being inspired to improve yourself.  Personally speaking,  I have no problem with my Thaiyas kids or Chachas kids doing better than me. May they be prosperous in their endeavours.  When I look at the culprits of this kind of thing, it is usually some female in the background like a jealous thaiee or chachi.  If there is one thing I have learnt in life is that in general be a bit less trustful in your non-blood female relatives.
    • do you know about shareeka? people compete more with their shareeks than with anyone one else, it is so deep routed and obsessive!  people will put themselves in debt just to compete with their shreeka!   it plays such a huge part in society there and is so deep routed, i really cant get my head around it!  i understand it,  but the obsession that they have i really dont understand that! it part of the fabric of society.  but this competing with your shareeks isnt a new thing it goes decades back probably over a 100 years back 
    • I agreed with this fox guy when he appeared on question time cos not everything these crazy far left feminists or muslim activists say is classed as "white male privilege". but now he has shown his true White male privilege and far right white racist views when he complained about a sikh soldier being featured in the new movie 1917 as "forced diversity" in the movie industry. Had he had a brain or some intelligence he would have realised 83,000+ turbanned sikh soldiers died fighting shoulder to shoulder with allied forces in both world wars defending the UK in foreign lands they had no personal conflict with. It shows these white racists are  trying to go mainstream these days aided by stupid views of far left crazypot idiots causing people to become more tolerant to the alternative opposite views.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use