Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
singhunit

Ringleader Dhaliwal

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Punjabiwolves said:

Its common for Sikh,Hindu, and Jains to share a surname with Muslim, like Shah,Patel, Gill, Choudhary etc. as for Jatts they can come across as very lively larger the life personalities, they do love a good time that's for sure. I do get on very well with Jatts. this Amere guy more likely relates more to his up north Pakistani ghetto gang then Sikh  Jatts 

Yeah this guy was 'living it up'. 

I tell you, boys from spoilt families often turn out to be self absorbed and without conscience. I can't believe this c***. He can't have been unaware of the grooming against Sikh girls by paks, and he goes down this path?? What the heck???

I wonder if the 'asian' girl they abused was an apnee too? 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, S4NGH said:

Amere is not his real name. The address he's given is of a rental property and not of his residence. He is married with children. His dad was a womaniser. His mum and sisters are nothing alike. It's well known that "amere" was a dealer; he worked on a factory floor and drove big cars etc etc flaunting his cash. He was a mona up until he got caught out fiddling with kids. He donned the singh image in an attempt to show reform etc. And now he'll become a Muslim in jail to protect his a$$ quite literally.

"converted to sikh religion". Lord. Why do people read the dailyfail? especially apne lok.

Just to be clear. Was he always a Sikh but took Amrit?

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

Yeah this guy was 'living it up'. 

I tell you, boys from spoilt families often turn out to be self absorbed and without conscience. I can't believe this c***. He can't have been unaware of the grooming against Sikh girls by paks, and he goes down this path?? What the heck???

I wonder if the 'asian' girl they abused was an apnee too? 

 I don't think this guy cared much about Sikh despite his image. if he did he would not carry out such actions. this grooming issue has been talked about in Gudwara as seen in Sikh channel where Sikh girls have been groomed by Muslims gangs. Muslims grooming gangs have been made aware of this and now trying to use scum guys like Amere to do their dirty work portraying a Sikh image.  it is really worrying 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

Come on. We should all know by now. Hordes of Juts of Panjab converted to Islam but the majority of these hide their surnames with an Islamic one but a small number still retain their gotra. I met quite a few growing up in East London. 

Anyway, I wonder what made this guy keep his kesh given his proclivities? Maybe it was a way of deflecting?

To right. these juts and jaats or jats or whatever you want to call them are all the same. bunch of tats. 

I personaly feel the guy is trying to hide his true identity. ie with a  big dhari and turban. So when he gets out he will shave it off and be anonymous. 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Punjabiwolves said:

 I don't think this guy cared much about Sikh despite his image. if he did he would not carry out such actions. this grooming issue has been talked about in Gudwara as seen in Sikh channel where Sikh girls have been groomed by Muslims gangs. Muslims grooming gangs have been made aware of this and now trying to use scum guys like Amere to do their dirty work portraying a Sikh image.  it is really worrying 

You can't blame them for his actions bro. He was a willing participant. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DailyMail said:

Just to be clear. Was he always a Sikh but took Amrit?

always a "sikh" but adopted the singh identity when police investigations begun 5+ years back. dastar, kes, kirpan. Whether he actually took amrit, I don't know.

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

8 minutes ago, Big_Tera said:

To right. these juts and jaats or jats or whatever you want to call them are all the same. bunch of tats. 

 

yeah because millions of jatts are "all the same"   how stupid       stop making it into a caste issue.   

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, puzzled said:

 

yeah because millions of jatts are "all the same"   how stupid       stop making it into a caste issue.   

Whatever mate. 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Big_Tera said:

Stop defending the guy because he is a tat. 

umm   when did i defend him?   all i said was whats the need to make it into a caste issue by saying things like jatts are "all the same"      

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Something's definitely fishy. Either he's an ex sullah or an ex mona using his Sikh image to either

 

a) Divert from the fact that he's a sullah and not make Islam look bad 

 

or

 

b) He's a mona (who no one in huddersfield knows of in the Sangat) and quietly kept kesh so extended family and the lot don't recognize him and makes his crimes seem less worse.

 

BBC has plastered his picture all over. They love to kiss up to the Islamophobia brigade, but in this case they love to plaster the pic of him in a kesri dastar.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hammertime007 said:

Was he groomed to be a groomer by Pakistani community to make us bahdnarme? 

Come on! A man has to take responsibility for his own actions. It's not like he was a sixteen year old or something. He must have had a dark heart to start with - to do all this gundh. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • healthy competition is fine but when you stop talking and get really violent over the joint khoo in the fields and the wall between the houses then that is a serious problem.  its jealousy and greed.   2 men from my mum shreek were about to start a fight with hammers and other farming tools in the fields  luckily my mums brother got there and stopped them.  things get really serious there  yh thaiya chachiya are the worse   they want to hog everything for their own kids,  they ruin the whole joint dynamic of the family.  my thia and chacha fell out and built a wall between their houses, their wives then used to get their kids to argue as well.    lol no joke but one day while my thaye was out, my chachi came around and destroyed my thayis chulla with a sledge hammer!  my thayi then rang us and was crying on the phone and said that she had to ask the neighbors for roti!   like what the hell were we supposed to do all the way from the uk!!!     these women are so venomous towards each other    
    • Yes I am aware of Shareeka.  I guess there is nothing wrong in some healthy competition and being inspired to improve yourself.  Personally speaking,  I have no problem with my Thaiyas kids or Chachas kids doing better than me. May they be prosperous in their endeavours.  When I look at the culprits of this kind of thing, it is usually some female in the background like a jealous thaiee or chachi.  If there is one thing I have learnt in life is that in general be a bit less trustful in your non-blood female relatives.
    • do you know about shareeka? people compete more with their shareeks than with anyone one else, it is so deep routed and obsessive!  people will put themselves in debt just to compete with their shreeka!   it plays such a huge part in society there and is so deep routed, i really cant get my head around it!  i understand it,  but the obsession that they have i really dont understand that! it part of the fabric of society.  but this competing with your shareeks isnt a new thing it goes decades back probably over a 100 years back 
    • I agreed with this fox guy when he appeared on question time cos not everything these crazy far left feminists or muslim activists say is classed as "white male privilege". but now he has shown his true White male privilege and far right white racist views when he complained about a sikh soldier being featured in the new movie 1917 as "forced diversity" in the movie industry. Had he had a brain or some intelligence he would have realised 83,000+ turbanned sikh soldiers died fighting shoulder to shoulder with allied forces in both world wars defending the UK in foreign lands they had no personal conflict with. It shows these white racists are  trying to go mainstream these days aided by stupid views of far left crazypot idiots causing people to become more tolerant to the alternative opposite views.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use