Jump to content

SikhSangat.com not fit for purpose?


mahandulai
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, BhForce said:

See, the problem is that he is being dishonest in his approach. 

I asked him whether he takes the same approach in relation to every other author that is presented in his school or college classes. He says yes.

Sorry, but I cannot but see that as a lie. The teacher starts out to teach Shakespeare, or whatever, and he (instead of reading from the play), starts talking about "What proof is there that Shakespeare even existed?" or "These are Shakespeare's actual words"? 

Or the teacher starts talking about WWII, and he says "What proof is there that Churchill or Hitler even existed?"

Oh, I would love to hear him say "There's no proof that Hitler killed 6 million Jews." Go ahead @mahandulai. Write up an article saying that (with your actual name), send it to a newspaper, or your college professor.

So, @Jaggaa, the problem people have is not with skepticism, but with a skepticism reserved only for our Gurus and Sikhism.

idc about if things actually happened or not. nobody does. 

what we have now, is the sggs, and what we have now is 'shakespeares's plays' which are still lovely even though idk who shakespeare really was! haha!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, BhForce said:

See, the problem is that he is being dishonest in his approach. 

I asked him whether he takes the same approach in relation to every other author that is presented in his school or college classes. He says yes.

Sorry, but I cannot but see that as a lie. The teacher starts out to teach Shakespeare, or whatever, and he (instead of reading from the play), starts talking about "What proof is there that Shakespeare even existed?" or "These are Shakespeare's actual words"? 

Or the teacher starts talking about WWII, and he says "What proof is there that Churchill or Hitler even existed?"

Oh, I would love to hear him say "There's no proof that Hitler killed 6 million Jews." Go ahead @mahandulai. Write up an article saying that (with your actual name), send it to a newspaper, or your college professor.

So, @Jaggaa, the problem people have is not with skepticism, but with a skepticism reserved only for our Gurus and Sikhism.

ignore all my other replies to you,

reply to this:

youre saying, 'this skeptic questions everything.'

I am not questioning randomly, but only, when someone's whole faith is by something that occured long ago, with no real proof. Stuff like devices that work blardy blardy blah, idc about if churchill lived or not, because no-one lives their life with Churchill shrines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mahandulai said:

ignore all my other replies to you,

reply to this:

youre saying, 'this skeptic questions everything.'

I am not questioning randomly, but only, when someone's whole faith is by something that occured long ago, with no real proof. Stuff like devices that work blardy blardy blah, idc about if churchill lived or not, because no-one lives their life with Churchill shrines.

context

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, mahandulai said:

idc about if things actually happened or not. nobody does. 

what we have now, is the sggs, and what we have now is 'shakespeares's plays' which are still lovely even though idk who shakespeare really was! haha!

You don't care that 6 million humans were killed because they belonged to a certain religion?  How can a person have no compassion.  Guru Nanak dev ji stood up to babur to stop the slaughter of poeple.  You know what does not exist, you.  You have slandered Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji.  Sukhmani sahib is very clear on what will happen to you now.  You will never find rest in your mind.  From door to door you will be looking for help but no help will be granted too you.  Many like you have come and pass on crying out for help.  Vaheguru will take many forms to save his saints and in that same form he will claw open the slanders torso.  This is a open forum where many can read your slanderous post toward the perfect saint.  If even one Gursikhs is hurt by your post, Vaheguru will not hesitate to send the demons of his to serve the punishment.  This is the reality you have messed with.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The title given by you to this thread is absolutely out of sense.

Better you sholud have put:

Is my trolling and nonsense allowed in Sikh sangat.com?

Then see all the anwers you get.

To start with, here goes the first reply.

GET LOSSSSSTTTTT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/24/2018 at 1:55 PM, PranaamShaheedaNu said:

I am at a disbelief that someone who has Kesh and ties a Dastar is questioning the very purpose of the identity that he is keeping - its Ludacris.

It's also a good warning not to compel your children to keep their kesh in all instances. Or you actually get more guys like this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use