Jump to content

Sikh woman calls out sikhphobia, muslim grooming gangs and anti-asian racist british media


genie
 Share

Recommended Posts

I believe I saw this same journalist do a story on blue star. The text in this is informative are the interviews.
When it comes to anti-"asian" sentiments I must say people will not like Sikhs if they continue to go after very young girls when they are adult men OR murder in drug wars OR act like the idiots in music videos. It also spells bad news to Sikhi if we are ethnocentric. Remember Sant Christ's message is very revered and it spans all races of people. If we continue to be kalistani hardliners other desi people and westerners alike will be wary of the presence of Sikhs.

On another note I wanted to make a topic about blue star now that I remember. I'm a bit fearful to. I am curious if the those who invaded were atheists or did they have bindi and ask chandi or ram for anything before they violated Amri. Should I make such a topic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should have included in my statement that the innocent majority are always ignored. If even 5% of a population is seen as detestable it will stain everyone in that population. Some examples would be: people hated the Germans even though Nazis were in small proportion, this is true of the Japanese and Russians also. Even in modern days enmity between Balak peoples. Still too remember how there was huge fear from westerners believing every Muslim was a suicide bomber yet few were/are?

Here are those articles about going after young girls aka grooming: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6238765/Child-groomer-abducted-girls-aged-11-13-jailed-two-years.html
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/578079/Schoolgirl-raped-by-60-members-of-Asian-sex-gang-by-the-age-of-16-in-quaint-UK-town

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, namespace said:

I should have included in my statement that the innocent majority are always ignored. If even 5% of a population is seen as detestable it will stain everyone in that population. Some examples would be: people hated the Germans even though Nazis were in small proportion, this is true of the Japanese and Russians also. Even in modern days enmity between Balak peoples. Still too remember how there was huge fear from westerners believing every Muslim was a suicide bomber yet few were/are?

Here are those articles about going after young girls aka grooming: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6238765/Child-groomer-abducted-girls-aged-11-13-jailed-two-years.html
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/578079/Schoolgirl-raped-by-60-members-of-Asian-sex-gang-by-the-age-of-16-in-quaint-UK-town

Oh, man, more stupidity: Nazis were doing what they were doing because of any ideology. So are jihadis. They're just following Sharia law, which tells them to kill infidels.

The handful of perverts who are Sikhs who target girls are not doing so because of Sikh ideology.

The huge numbers of Muslims who are doing the same is because of ideology: that they are waging war on non-Islamic societies, and therefore it is allowed to take non-Muslim females as war booty.

Please understand the difference!

The articles you cite: Daily Mail article is about someone named Charanjit Singh who targeted girls. Filth who do stuff like that should get the maximum punishment possible.

The second article: There are 60 members of a gang, probably 59 Muslim (going by the names in the article), and yet of 3 men pictured, one is a Sikh! The one bad Sikh is 1.66% of the gang members, but by picturing him, it makes it look like Sikhs were 33% of the gang. Stupid media.

The problem is not that Sikhs are targeting girls on an organized basis. The problem is merely that there are some bad apples, and those few individuals are being headlined by a media that doesn't bother to do the same for Muslims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use