Jump to content

Do you agree and support Ranjit Dhahderanwala Prachar?


S1ngh
 Share

Do you agree and support Ranjit Dhahderanwala Prachar?  

59 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you agree and support Ranjit Dhahderanwala Prachar?

    • Yes
      20
    • No
      30
    • I don't know him
      9


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, HardeepCov said:

After you answer my questions and 'slowly' read my post again.

Ok.

3 hours ago, HardeepCov said:

How do you know it will never succeed?

 

I base it on the western civilisation that has rejected Christianity and God ever since it start living according to scientific discovery.

 

3 hours ago, HardeepCov said:

 Is it better to believe in fairy tales?

What fairy tales? Like Baba Deep Singh fighting with his head cut off?

Tell me what particular fairy tales you have in mind.

 

3 hours ago, HardeepCov said:

When children ask why we do something or why such and such is happening do you think its better to give them an answer which makes logical sense or better to say something like lok idha kehde aa? Sianhe idha kehde aa? Babaji idha kehnda aa? That's not good enough especially for older more independent thinking kids. Or do you want our children to be like sheep and just follow the crowd?

 

Well this ties in with the question I put to you. Prove to me using science and logic that "god" exists so I can pray to him/her/it.

I'm one of these older, more independent thinking children. I don't want to be a sheep and follow the crowd. So please prove to me using science and logic that "god" exists so I can pray to him/her/it.

Also who would you count as "lok,siane,babaji" ?

I think that Bhai Gurdas Ji, Bhai Mani Singh ji etc don't fall into the above category.

 

3 hours ago, HardeepCov said:

Also science has been changing since the development of the Quantum theory. Many quantum physicists say there were atheists but now believe in a higher power and believe the universe is made by design.

"many" ? So you shouldnt have a problem in proving that "god" exists and I should pray to him/her/it.

 

3 hours ago, HardeepCov said:

Science is a great tool but I don't think it has all the answers. Some of these we need to find within ourselves.

Let's leave aside "I don't think it has all the answers" for the moment. Lets get somewhere on the most basic question. Let science prove that "god" exists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jaggaa said:

now exploring more mainstream Sikhi

Please elaborate on what this "mainstream Sikhi" is.

Ranjit Dhandri, or anybody for that matter, is under no obligation to follow or believe the opposite of whatever kind of Sikhi you think he preaches but that doesn't mean that you do complete khandan mandan of Traditional/Sampardaic Sikhi. This is not the Sikh way of doing veechaar/prachaar.

His extreme 180 on his viewpoints, deliberately provocative and controversial speeches/videos etc, baseless challenges, and as I said shameless khandan mandan makes many suspicious of his motives which come off as underhanded and deceitful. I'm not trying to insult him but the farce he calls prachaar/katha is just him ignorantly running off at the mouth.

If he was a figure in a different arena, he would have unconditionally lost all credibilty.

I mean Jeez the guy doesn't even know what Merry Christmas means lol instead confidently giving his own whacky, erroneous (but hilarious) arth...that should be an indication of this guy's avastha and level of gyaan. Ehna hankaar?

 

Gurbar Akaal!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Jaggaa said:

People are against Bhai Ranjit Singh because of him calling out a lot of the story/sakhian spread throughout our history.

People are also against ghaghri because he has called Bhai Gurdas Ji a liar. He has also committed the folly of trying to redefine what "god" is which against the Mool Mantar. He has also told people that "god " wants them to sleep-in, in the mornings because that is the way "god" has designed them, to recharge their batteries instead of waking up for nitnem.

I'm sure you have heard ghaghri say that births and deaths are only in the mind. What nonsense is that?

 

This has nothing to do with sakhian. You are trying to portray this as the only reason that people are against ghaghri.

 

45 minutes ago, Jaggaa said:

I see people using certain stories to gain exclusivity and influence under the banner of Guru Sahib.

So do I. I see a person in flambouyant outfits which I would expect to see in Brazilian gay/lesbian parades gaining influence only because of SGGS in his diwans and a load of brain-dead cult followers.

 

45 minutes ago, Jaggaa said:

Just because a particular Sakhi was written/spoken by a well known "Gursikh" in say the 1800's doesn't automatically make it authentic because what's there to say he didn't just do what the same people are doing today?

 

So the Guru could make mistakes according to you? Bhai Gurdas Ji vaaram contain a lot of sakhis. Guru Sahib also selected Bhai Gurdas Ji to scribe SGGS. Could Guru Sahib have done this without knowing that Bhao Gurdas has written in his vaars?

 

45 minutes ago, Jaggaa said:

Bhai Sahib is entitled to his own interpretation to Guru Sahib, at no point is he going against Gurbani.

Saying there is no reincarnation. No 84 lakh joon is going against Guru Sahib.

 

45 minutes ago, Jaggaa said:

I'd say he comes from a very priveleged background having initially been among a sadhu/dera background and now exploring more mainstream Sikhi -

"mainstream" ? Mainstream Sikhi has never rejected reincarnation.

 

45 minutes ago, Jaggaa said:

people who are outright disregarding him because he's challenged something they were taught from a young age. That's what I don't agree with.

Thats because you are wrong. People, like me, outrightly oppose him because of his anti-gurmat teachings.

I oppose him because he is a big supporter of darshan rogis group in USA. They support him and he supports them. the same rogi who changed the khande di pahul vidhi.

Such a heinous crime by darshan rogi yet not ONE word from ghaghri about it whilst every Sikh who has faith in his Guru has spoken against rogi.

 

46 minutes ago, Jaggaa said:

I mean there's nothing wrong with having strong opinions but I can't engage in a conversation with someone who is simply blurting out some sort of emotional me vs you type of speech. I'm not interested because it seems like a waste of time as not only is it counter-productive it doesn't belong in a discussion from where one can learn from.

 

Tough. I might not be the person who you are refering to, but I will respond to any type of applause from anyone for ghaghri.

I myself don't understand why you would stand in support of someone who has said the anti-gurmat things ghaghri has said. its like you have no faith in Gurbani.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use