Jump to content

Would you let your kids take part in a "gay pride" event at school?


Recommended Posts

Some Christian mother is left furious after her son had to take part in some "gay pride parade" event held at their primary school. Would you let your child take part in a gay pride event at his primary school?

I would NEVER let my kids take part in anything like that. These schools are now telling our kids what lifestyles are acceptable and what are not. Kids no longer are able to decide for themselves what they agree with and what they don't. There is no such thing as debate. They are being fed with all that feminists, leftists  liberal crap which is being forced down our kids. What if a kid doesn't agree with it? what if a kid stands up and says he/she doesn't agree with gays?  is that allowed or will his/her parents be contacted and told off?   

main question is, the gay pride is about sexuality, why the hell are primary school kids being paraded around celebrating it?

The educations system has been taken over by liberal, feminist, left wing agenda and kids are now being told what they should accept, they are being brainwashed into agreeing with all this stuff and the ultra liberal media don't help either.   

Young people are losing the ability to decide for themselves and are being told whats right and whats wrong 

So would you let your kid be paraded around in some gay pride event held by their primary school? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, puzzled said:

Some Christian mother is left furious after her son had to take part in some "gay pride parade" event held at their primary school. Would you let your child take part in a gay pride event at their primary school?

I would NEVER let my kids take part in anything like that. These schools are now telling our kids what lifestyles are acceptable and what are not. Kids no longer are able to decide for themselves what they agree with and what they don't. There is no such thing as debate. They are being fed with all that feminists, leftists  liberal crap which is being forced down our kids. What if a kid doesn't agree with it? what if a kid stands up and says he/she doesn't agree with gays?  is that allowed or will his/her parents be contacted and told off?   

main question is, the gay pride is about sexuality, why the hell are primary school kids being paraded around celebrating it?

The educations system has been taken over by liberal, feminist, left wing agenda and kids are now being told what they should accept, they are being brainwashed into agreeing with all this stuff and the ultra liberal media don't help either.   

Young people are losing the ability to decide for themselves and are being told whats right and whats wrong 

So would you let your kid be paraded around in some gay pride event held by their primary school? 

No never lol

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, GuestKaur2 said:

No never lol

good, this whole schooling system is a fraud. kids are not encouraged to think for themselves or give their own opinions but are told what they should agree with, no debate, nothing. no wonder young people these days are like a bunch of lost sheep 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know this christian man whose son was told off by the teacher for not agreeing with the LGBT community. I'm not against the LGBT community but when kids are being brainwashed and told what they should agree with, that i am totally against. No diversity in thought or opinion is allowed.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, puzzled said:

good, this whole schooling system is a fraud. kids are not encouraged to think for themselves or give their own opinions but are told what they should agree with, no debate, nothing. no wonder young people these days are like a bunch of lost sheep 

In school we are taught about tolerance and a load of bs like that, yeh if others want to do that in their spare time they can carry on but I don't pay attention. I got better things to do tbh lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO

My reason is because I do not see why my child has do something for an interest group he or she is not a part of, under force.  If they were gay that's one thing, but people from my culture aren't encouraged to be like it is in the west so I doubt that would be the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, namespace said:

NO

My reason is because I do not see why my child has do something for an interest group he or she is not a part of, under force.  If they were gay that's one thing, but people from my culture aren't encouraged to be like it is in the west so I doubt that would be the case.

Children don't need to be taught about that right now, children are more innocent why have they got to go polluting their minds?

Link to post
Share on other sites

look,

1. why are school's dwindling resources being spent on this drivel instead of on things our kids could benefit from like school library books, colouring pencils/paints even paper?

2. Essentially our kids at that age group are asexual because they are just learning to be in the world , you can be sympathetic to differences without taking out a parade

3. the theme of the term was 'proud of being me '  I would have picked being of colour, different faith/culture first before sexuality because the others are being experienced right then whereas being gay is strictly theory.

4. Our children are being exposed to the trans and gay narrative via storybooks too now , so know what the 'teachers' are reading or discussing with them .

5. Last year in Brighton they were quizzing three years old as to what they identified as before enrolling them . my guess answers ranged from dinosaur to choo choo train ...of course parents were upset .

6. Schools are not meant to destroy young minds by filling them with filth, the world will do that aplenty ; they are meant to stick to teaching reading writing and maths , being a good person through sharing and caring .

7. every year there are more and more charity days for BBC sponsored events like children in need , and jeans for genes , you and I know that the money never gets to the right places but the schools are doing a number on the tykes heads by saying if you don't join in shame on you ....

8. Lastly, if the school's cannot safeguard my child from assault then frankly I am not about to subject my child to government sponsored  indoctrination.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest fateh.info

Vahigurujikakhalsavahigurujikifateh!

the disgraceful language and ideas being posted by so called Sikhs on this thread is abominable. 

1.) point out where in Siri Guru Granth Sahib ji it says only men and women can be married

2.) to say you’re not against gay’s (there are more sexualities than just gay... read Siri Guru Dasam Granth) and then say we love them. Your children and the children of the panth need to learn gay pride because the hate, ignorance and vile attitudes their parents before them hold. 

3.) everything I’m this world happens within the gurus hukam. Guru Arjan Dev ji maharaaj had interactions with openely gay Sufi’s. if there was so much hate, then the guru would have protested lgbtq sexualities. 

4.) you attitudes are a direct result of christianiszed colonial beliefs... fix yourselves.

5.) homosexual marriage was outlawed in 2006 by akaal takhat, as this has never been an issue in the past. However... do you really follow the joke institution SGPC who are sitting on a stolen Gaddi of the Buddah Dal (rightful heirs to the throne). 

I invite you to read and learn about grubani properly on www.fateh.info, decolonize your minds! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I suppose Bhagat Ravidas Ji's heart-wrenching lamentations about caste discrimination (which later became part of Gurbani) were just a figment of his imagination?
    • What do you propose we view them as when they become the enemy again ONLY because they were nursed back to health by our side? If we keep healing them and they return to reduce our numbers thanks to our demented efforts to please God knows who, what then? It's cloud cuckoo-land. Who fights a war to WIN with such a horribly confused philosophy hanging over their heads?   Too late for this now. My cynical self suspects this to be revisionisim to save face or rectify centuries of damaging parchaar that has had the opposite affect of what was intended. NOT ONE giani or kathavachak has EVER contextualised Bhai Kanaiya's escapades on the battlefield by discussing his martial prowess. The sakhi has always been employed as a tool to illustrate compassion and fairness. If we suddenly start hearing about how Bhai Sahib cut off Mughal limbs and heads one moment, and then provided water to dying Mughals a few minutes later, we'll become an even bigger laughing stock than we already are.
    • https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9831797/Bradford-child-abuse-report-reveals-victim-raped-forced-Islamic-marriage.html?ito=amp_twitter_share-top Social worker 'attended wedding of terrified girl, 15, to her abuser': Carers turned a blind eye when teenage grooming victim was forced into Islamic marriage, damning report reveals Independent review on child sexual exploitation was published on Tuesday The review was commissioned in the wake of the sentencing of nine men in 2019 It found social workers in Bradford had turned a blind eye to grooming victim  By JAMES TOZER FOR DAILY MAIL PUBLISHED: 19:47, 27 July 2021 | UPDATED: 01:39, 28 July 2021                       e-mail     8kshares 1.2k View comments   Social workers in Bradford turned a blind eye when a 15-year-old grooming victim took part in an Islamic marriage to one of her abusers, a damning report revealed yesterday. Despite the teenager not coming from a Muslim background, professionals meant to protect her then allowed the parents of her 'husband' to foster her after she became pregnant, it revealed. One of her social workers allegedly even attended the wedding ceremony. The terrified girl – referred to as 'Anna' – was left in a state of 'domestic slavery', too scared to leave the controlling relationship for fear she would be the victim of an honour killing, she told the report's authors. Details emerged yesterday in an independent report into the treatment of five abuse victims in the West Yorkshire city over the past two decades, which found that 'children suffered abuse no child should have to experience'.  Alarmingly, it concluded that some youngsters in Bradford 'remain unprotected' from sex exploitation.   +2   Social workers in Bradford turned a blind eye when a 15-year-old grooming victim took part in an Islamic marriage to one of her abusers, the damning report revealed yesterday (stock image) The report – described by the body which commissioned it as making 'difficult and, at times, distressing reading' – began two years ago after nine men of Pakistani heritage were jailed for more than 57 years over the sexual exploitation of girls who had been in Bradford Council's care. Anna was placed in residential care as a teenager in 2002 but went missing more than 70 times, according to the report. She disclosed details of sexual abuse – including rapes – to a confidential support service for girls involved in prostitution, but nothing was passed on to police or social workers. RELATED ARTICLES Previous 1 Next Lumberjack, 24, doing his 'dream job' was crushed to death...Britain's biggest travel insurance provider stops offering... SHARE THIS ARTICLE Share The following year, aged 15, she told the project worker she had converted to Islam and married her older Asian 'boyfriend' in a Sharia law ceremony. The report said it appeared there had been 'collusion' with this by her social worker 'who allegedly attended the ceremony and assessed that her marriage was likely to reduce the risks incurred when Anna was missing'. Staggeringly, despite becoming pregnant, after a review Anna was formally placed with her abuser's parents as a foster child, with the family even paid a fostering allowance.   +2   The report began two years ago after nine men were jailed for more than 57 years over the sexual exploitation of girls who had been in Bradford Council's care. Pictured: Basharat Khaliq, Saeed Akhtar, Naveed Akhtar, Parvaze Ahmed, Zeeshan Ali, Fahim Iqbal, Izar Hussain, Mohammed Usman and Kieran Harris who were all jailed at Bradford Crown Court in 2019 Anna told the report's author: 'At 14 years old I was engaged to be married, taking on the role of an Islamic wife fulfilling the needs of my husband and the extended family somewhat like a maid. 'We had no similarities in race, religion or culture and I continued to be subject to domestic violence and was subject to a coercive, controlling sexual relationship with a known perpetrator. I was frightened to leave, in fear of an honour-based killing.' The report concluded: 'It is hard to understand how this decision can have been made and it resulted in Anna being entirely reliant on her abuser and his family.' Instead of protecting her from harm, the placement left her 'at greater risk and made her entirely dependent on them', it added. While there, she was subjected to 'domestic slavery' and 'sexually abused and exploited by dozens of adult males', it went on. The Bradford Partnership – which includes Bradford Council children's services and Bradford Police – has since apologised to young abuse victims who had been failed. It said a large number of defendants have been found guilty and given substantial prison sentences. The joint statement said: 'We believe that practice across all agencies is improving... but there is much more to do.'  
    • I don't think narcissism is on their increase per se  I think that narcissism was always there in people and all that has happened is the narcissism is now out in the open. It has been amplified.  Similar to how people who become rich become arrogant and obnoxious. Money did not change them, it just exposed them to show they really are.  We had social controls in society that shunned narcissist aspects so that it got buried. With social controls now being untangled it is no longer taboo and with social media (instagram and tiktok ) it has upscaled attention seeking and the narcissism. But with a overload of narcissism and attention seeking in society, I think what could happen is: 1. We could see narcissist insensitivity in that we will see people less bothered with the attention seeking 2. A backlash and swing in the pendulum 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use