Jump to content

Will the British govt apologise for the Jallianwala Bagh massacre 100years after the event?


JSinghnz
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, JSinghnz said:

An apology now will for something done 100 years ago will not make the pommies liable to pay anything to anyone. Canada has the moral strength to apologise and hence is a much stronger nation than England. 

It took Canada nearly 100 years to apologise and even then it was a fairly Liberal Prime Minister ans party, every country has their own demons, it's just that in this case England has more than most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, puzzled said:

I think one of the British prime ministers apologized during their visit to India, think it was David Cameron.

He got a lot of flack from goreh on social media, they were saying why did he appologize for something their ancestors did 

No British PM has apologised for the massacre yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest GuestSingh

this year also being the 550th gurpurab of guru nanak dev ji, 320th of the khalsa and 35th of 1984..we should think about trying to do something positive for ourselves to help the panth...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/18/2019 at 10:49 PM, JSinghnz said:

No British PM has apologised for the massacre yet. 

Yes, correct. Cameron sort-of commiserated with Sikhs, and admitted what happened was shameful, but stopped short of an apology. I think they call it "lawyer speak" where instead of outright stating, "I'm sorry for what we did" they phrase it as, "I'm sorry you feel such pain" thereby the onus is thrown onto the aggrieved party, lol. It's very devious but it's done to avoid any unnecessary legal entanglements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use