Jump to content

Shall we start s debate on Christianity?


Redoptics
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

It's good to have knowledge of other faiths, especially for rebutting challenges they throw your way in relation to your own faith. But too much of this seems like wasting time and energy that could be spent exploring your own heritage/dharam, which is more rewarding imo. 

I mean time spent doing that could be spent improving one's own Gurmukhi skills or building up your Brij Bhasha vocab (which I'm increasingly realising is more and more important for Sikhs given the knowledge in Dasam Granth and other puratan ithihaasic granths).

Totally agree , research was done in late 90s , whilst at college  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Redoptics said:

'El' is their god however now when the bible is understood correctly its 'Elohim' which means gods. It depends who talj talk too.

i dont even think god has a name in the hebrew bible. Also the hebrew bible starts of with "in the beginning" and then starts describing the creation story and god created the heavens, earth, animals, sky and oceans etc    so they believe in the creator  who created everything, which is actually what we believe.  They also believe in the beginning there was nothing and that it was god that began creation and created everything, so only god is responsible for creation 

Christians also believe this 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They also have concept of Hukkam and god testing us, when god created Adam one of the first things he said to him was he may eat any fruit but not fruit from the tree of life, adam decided to break that hukkam after being misled by his wife and ate the apple, god then punished adam and made him leave the safety of the garden and live a hard life in the wilderness. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/4/2019 at 10:25 PM, Redoptics said:

I have noticed a few poster's,  keep questioning certain points I make about Christianity,  I do not understand why people are so quick to back them. 

If you have not studied religion fair enough, but hey lets debate, I will start with this.

In my research Christianity deals with astrotheology not spirituality. 

Please do not offend and if you back up your points with facts, that would be awesome.

What even is astrotheology? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use