Where were the white males?

[Premi5]

In all these places up north, where predominantly white working class girls were groomed - where were the stereotypical proud northern white working class brothers/fathers/uncles (yes I am aware that maybe they are from families where the father is absent) ?

[puzzled]

A lot of whites are accepting of their women dating ethnic men   but they probably were not aware of it leading to grooming.

 

[MisterrSingh]

2 hours ago, Premi5 said:

In all these places up north, where predominantly white working class girls were groomed - where were the stereotypical proud northern white working class brothers/fathers/uncles (yes I am aware that maybe they are from families where the father is absent) ?

The answer to that would require an essay, lol. It all feeds into the gradual yet purposeful post-war social and political policies engendered by the establishment that have hit the working classes the hardest. IMO there's definite parallels between the demoralisation of the white working classes in places like England, and the way India has gone about dealing with its rural Sikh populations. You don't need to physically harm anyone in order to destroy their spirit. A certain Sikh yodha mentioned something about the death of a conscience. Of course, there's enough plausible deniability in both cases for those who haven't succumbed to those problem to poo-poo the possibility of such issues being a reality.

[Guest]

2 hours ago, puzzled said:

A lot of whites are accepting of their women dating ethnic men   but they probably were not aware of it leading to grooming.

 

males tend to see women as "honour" . So they wouldn't usually tolerate their sisters/daughters marrying outside the community or religion or race. 

Unless in case of rajput hindus who deliberately married their daughters to mughals just to form a stronger relationship with the mughals which in turn gave a considerable degree of insurance that the rajput kingdom and hindus in general would be safer in an islamic india .

LOL

This also explains why "saala" (wife's brother) is considered a slur in india. Basically the wife's brother is the "loser" who let you screw his sister. 

[puzzled]

23 minutes ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

males tend to see women as "honour" . So they wouldn't usually tolerate their sisters/daughters marrying outside the community or religion or race. 

Unless in case of rajput hindus who deliberately married their daughters to mughals just to form a stronger relationship with the mughals which in turn gave a considerable degree of insurance that the rajput kingdom and hindus in general would be safer in an islamic india .

LOL

This also explains why "saala" (wife's brother) is considered a slur in india. Basically the wife's brother is the "loser" who let you screw his sister. 

many whites don't actually mind when their women marry ethnic men, In some multicultural areas half the white women are with black men. Whites don't really have this concept of family honour lol      seeing a white woman with a ethnic man is actually common in many multicultural towns and cities. 

Rajput case ij interesting, once heroic warriors, they even defeated the early islamic arab invasions like in the battle of rajasthan, and then they became so weak that they started getting their daughters married off to the invaders!  I think their ego was the cause of their slow and embarrassing downfall,   perhaps Sikhs can learn from this ....

[Premi5]

4 hours ago, puzzled said:

many whites don't actually mind when their women marry ethnic men, In some multicultural areas half the white women are with black men. Whites don't really have this concept of family honour lol     

I don't think this is really true. 

Most goray if they're honest (at least excluding 'millennials' generation onwards) do not want their family members marrying out of the same demographic unless the husband/partner is thought to be a reasonable match.

Certainly, I don't think they would put up with their female relatives being abused.

[dallysingh101]

10 hours ago, Premi5 said:

In all these places up north, where predominantly white working class girls were groomed - where were the stereotypical proud northern white working class brothers/fathers/uncles (yes I am aware that maybe they are from families where the father is absent) ?

They were probably too scared of paks because they've been battered by them previously.  Same in London. 

[dallysingh101]

Just now, dallysingh101 said:

They were probably too scared of paks because they've been battered by them previously.  Same in London. 

#in parts of London. 

They'd probably react differently if the culprits were apnay. Gora tend to think Indians are pajamay compared to paks who run big criminal gangs.

[dallysingh101]

Also, the police and political reaction (which was essentially collusion with the pedos) probably put them on a back foot too. 

[imhosingh]

12 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

Also, the police and political reaction (which was essentially collusion with the pedos) probably put them on a back foot too. 

If you look at all the stories and backgrounds , the police and social services 'marked' those who try to raise concerns or interrupt the pedos. The pedos as they were mainly family related or clan related also used their vote blocks (councillors and local politicians many of whom were also involved ) to get the authorities to target any whistleblowers or disruptors. Basically it was and still is a sick situation . Watch the Sikh youth UK vids on how the police would arrest those trying to stop the pedos and not the culprits