Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Guest 500rma

Has “Amritdhari” only been reduced to a tag?

Recommended Posts

Guest 500rma

I recently met two singhs who were accused of doing beadbi of Amrit by indulging in eating meat and drinking alcohol. A friend of mine who is their roommate informed me that they take off their gatray and do all kinds of nonsense.

which made me wonder if being an Amritdhari has only been reduced to an additional tag to being a Sikh. There are also many underlying mental health issues among the kesadhari and amritdhari community alike. 

I have met many amritdharis in my life and I have yet to meet a single person who I thought had an amazing personality and really practiced what he preached. It’s mostly really arrogant folks who are like “your hands are juthay” which is somehow always the case. They have become bhamans who they hate so much. My uncle is the same as well. His tablet was filled with adult content when I borrowed it one time and he LITERALLY HAS MAHARAJ AT HOME! It really makes me reconsider taking Amrit cause I’m still looking for someone that would inspire and someone that I can actually follow. These are really poor examples of amritdharis

I have seen monays be more into sikhi than so many kesadharis. Shouldn’t it be the other way. Monay think that they are following sikhi by going to gurdwaray every Sunday and doing Seva and listening to bani. Kesadharis think they are following sikhi by keeping the kesh. Tying their beards up with so much glue is the lowest thing among this community. Then they end up developing rashes and trimming their beards. I think that there should be a clear line drawn among amritdharis and others.

for instance, it should be made mandatory that amritdharis should be wearing kirpans on the outside or conform to only wearing dummallay. The non amritdharis can wear regular pagga. 

This needs to be addressed cause clearly the definition of who’s a Sikh and who’s not a Sikh isn’t clear.

waheguru ji ka Khalsa waheguru ji ki fateh!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Gurfateh

I also think only amritdharis should tie a dumalla, I’ve seen keshdharis wear a massive dumalla and then swear eat <banned word filter activated>/khulla maas etc. 

Ive met amritdharis who haven’t even done their santhiya and have been listening to bani for over a year not bothering to learn. I feel like if someone wants to take Amrit, they should practice their amritvela for six months, complete santhiya so they can read Gurbani shudd and understand it.

i have been the example of amritdharis u have portrayed: 

I have personally been this person, I took Amrit at 12, the first in my family (no ones even keshdhari) I didn’t practice amritvela or learn Gurbani, 1 year later I knew how to read Gurbani a little however I completely stopped waking up at amritvela. This alone completely messed up my rehat, I was just wearing my kakkars and tying a dumalla, I then stopped tying that and started to tie a keski. Then I stopped wearing my kakkars. 

Years later when I was 15 I started to learn santhiya, upon completing santhiya I started waking up at amritvela and then practicing for 2 1/2 years later at the age of 18 I went pesh and now with maharajas kirpa I am chardikala. The biggest step in continuing my amritvela was once I had learnt my santhiya as I knew I could get up and read with concentration instead of just getting up to listen. 

Amritdharis should practice like I did before they take Amrit and then decide if it’s for them. 

Not just read bani but also practice shastarvidiya, what’s the point of wearing a shaster if you can’t wield it. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It goes both ways. If you hear the Islamic narrative they also prob up Islamic invaders and rulers as benign. You should hear what they say about an invader like Muhammad Bin Qaasim who is hailed as a hero and who just came to save a few Muslim women while the defender Raja Dahir is portrayed as an evil scheming, degenerate pervert. But historic Muslim sources like the Chachnama convey a different story and testify how the invading Muslim Arabs had taken thousands of Hindu Sindhi women back with them.    Or look at how they view Aurangzeb. They shamelessly justify his hate  and war crimes against the Hindus and Sikhs. Many even call him a Wali of Allah or a great saint much like how the Buddhists view King Ashok. He is universally respected by Sunni Muslims. He is basically the main reason why most Punjabi and Mirpuri Rajputs and Jatts are Muslims in Pakistan today.   The Hindu and Muslim grand narratives are very different. The Sikh grand narrative can best be read at the starting of Bhangu's Panth Prakash. Bhangu very elaborately explains the condition of India before Guru Nanak Dev ji took avtar and then what followed and how Sikhs got raaj by Vaheguru
    • see doing stuff like that is just stupid! but then again you cnt expect anything else from india.  marathas were deafed by afghans    but eventually without a doubt they took over india and made it into a hindu state again      iv heard that captain amrinder wanted to remove sikh ithiaas from punjab txt books? 
    • i really liked this movie    the last scene gave me goosbumps!        i wanna watch ajay devgans tanhaji next   
    • thanks I'll look into that 
    • showing the muslims in bad light is part of the hindutva motive though isnt it   so thats why the movies are so unbalanced. these movies are basically used politically and they are having a big impact in india.  but they are gd movies!  iv seen padmavaat  i really liked it   amazing production!    i wouldnt mind if they make a movie about sikh warriors like hari singh nalwa    currently bollywood is really gd with historical epics     
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use