Jump to content
Guest Guest_Singh

Our sisters that wear keski but cut facial hair/wax

Recommended Posts

Guest Guest_Singh

As a male, I realize that this might be insensitive but let me preface by saying that a male cannot understand what it is like to be a female in today's society so if an Amritdhari bibi is cutting her facial hair/wax, it doesn't bother me. It's the bibi's decision.

However, what does bother me is if that same bibi is wearing a keski. I don't understand the logic here?

Either:

1) cut your facial hair/wax and don't cover your hair on top of it; OR
2) don't do the above and wear a keski.

Sorry if I have offended anyone. Thanks. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

What about the the men who keep their hair and wear paghs but trim their beards ... 

So if they can do it and it's accepted then I guess women can too ... 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, puzzled said:

What about the the men who keep their hair and wear paghs but trim their beards ... 

So if they can do it and it's accepted then I guess women can too ... 

not if theyre amritdhari and the same goes for men - neither one of em should be harming a single hair on their body if theyve amritchak and given their head to guruji...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No idea about now, but a good few years ago, it was in vogue for women to get laser treatment before taking amrit ie they did it specifically so they didn’t have to worry about facial hair once they’d taken amrit. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, puzzled said:

What about the the men who keep their hair and wear paghs but trim their beards ... 

So if they can do it and it's accepted then I guess women can too ... 

Not quite.

Keski wearing women are Amritdhari women. Comparing them with an Amritdhari men is more of a proper comparison. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Guest_Singh
3 hours ago, puzzled said:

What about the the men who keep their hair and wear paghs but trim their beards ... 

So if they can do it and it's accepted then I guess women can too ... 

I understand the premise but I don't know of a single amritdhari man who trims his beard.

If there are men out there like that, then yes same logic applies. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Guest_Singh
3 hours ago, Wicked Warrior said:

No idea about now, but a good few years ago, it was in vogue for women to get laser treatment before taking amrit ie they did it specifically so they didn’t have to worry about facial hair once they’d taken amrit. 

I was not aware of this. I suppose this is a good compromise but I still find it really strange.

Again as a male, I'll never understand the perspective of a female. It is definitely tougher to be a female in today's modern society versus a male.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest paapiman
7 hours ago, GuestSingh said:

not if theyre amritdhari and the same goes for men - neither one of em should be harming a single hair on their body if theyve amritchak and given their head to guruji...

They are not harming the hair - they are actually murdering it.

Kes kattal deserves the death sentence as it is literally murder.

Anyone who cuts their hair is a Hindu in my opinion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, puzzled said:

What about the the men who keep their hair and wear paghs but trim their beards ... 

So if they can do it and it's accepted then I guess women can too ... 

Accepted by whom ? 

Who has the authority ? Who can judge ? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, GuestSingh said:

not if theyre amritdhari and the same goes for men - neither one of em should be harming a single hair on their body if theyve amritchak and given their head to guruji...

ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕਾ ਖਾਲਸਾ ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕੀ ਫ਼ਤਹਿ

Exactly, It is a Bajjar Kurhet to cut, trim, dye your hair and means you become a patit and have to go Pesh in front of the Panj Pyare and be blessed with Amrit again.

ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕਾ ਖਾਲਸਾ ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕੀ ਫ਼ਤਹਿ

Edited by RajKaregaKhalsa1
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Guest paapiman said:

Anyone who cuts their hair is a Hindu in my opinion

Why Hindu ? Why not other religion?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/21/2019 at 1:08 AM, Amit12 said:

Accepted by whom ? 

Who has the authority ? Who can judge ? 

By the Khalsa panth. Guru Sahib gave the Guruship to the ongoing institution of the Panj Piyare. They carry on the tradition of maintaining Khalsa rehit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/21/2019 at 1:56 AM, RajKaregaKhalsa1 said:

ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕਾ ਖਾਲਸਾ ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕੀ ਫ਼ਤਹਿ

Exactly, It is a Bajjar Kurhet to cut, trim, dye your hair and means you become a patit and have to go Pesh in front of the Panj Pyare and be blessed with Amrit again.

ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕਾ ਖਾਲਸਾ ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕੀ ਫ਼ਤਹਿ

Right. Calling a hair cutter "amritdhari" is wrong.

They are not "amritdhari", they are "patit".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/20/2019 at 6:18 PM, Guest Guest_Singh said:

I was not aware of this. I suppose this is a good compromise but I still find it really strange.

This is not a "compromise". It's just another way of a person rebelling against God and trying to fool him, which isn't possible.

Anyways, the answer to your question is that anybody can do whatever they want, including cutting hair.

But if you present yourself as an amritdhari and you violate the rehit, include the very basic rehit of not cutting your hair, you are a fake and a fraud.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest paapiman
15 hours ago, Sikhi4Ever said:

Why Hindu ? Why not other religion?

Maujooda Mukhi Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale said that kes kattal makes Hindu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • milk is needed for making Prasad - I could write a whole lot on why veganism is demented -another time.
    • why would anyone contemplate something so enslaving? THoughts are tangible things every bit as real as any object - meditate instead upon the liberation of moslem-occupied Aryavarta - Dharmic religions and Dharmic life cannot exist in presence of mohamadans. RamRajya-Khalsa Raj - this is the Future for the World. Xtianity is dying. islam is demented  - only Dharmic philosophy (this includes Vedanta/Sikhi/teachings of Gautam Buddh make sense.  All the sacrifices of the Early Gursikhs and the ones who valiantly fought the colonial bastards would have been for naught had all of Panjab been moslem occupied. Think, do ardas on how all of Panjab  (indeed all the af-pak lands) are to be reunified under the Dharmic banner of Sikhi, Vedanta, yoga etc. Sanatan community is working on this thru Ghar Wapsi - they have led delusional Sikhs who became xtian back to the Dharmic fold and back to Sikhi - xtianity ruins charmic village life. We are born divine - we have spark of Paramatman within us - the idea that people are born sinners creates a vicious sin-repent-guilt cycle difficult to escape. Life in halal torture lands is hell for vegetaryans/vaishnu peoples.  Guru ka Langar is pure vegetarian.  anglo jew hijacked veg movement with veganism - Milk and Milk products are healthful - we need proper dharmic dairy facilities.  The idea that any mass of land is thought to belong to anyone on basis of ethnicity/colour/creed  is stupid - the idea that any state is black or white or brown or moslem or xtian or jew is nonsensical. One Uniform Civil Code of Law (rooted in Dharmic truths) must apply without any favouritism shown to anyone. Polygamy is dysgenic and enslaving, particularly the Islamic type. Demographic warfare in hopes of establishing international caliphate must be uprooted.
    • Racial supremacists (of all stripes/colours) are ALIGNED politically with Moslem Global Caliphate aspirants. Especially the so-called 'white' supremacists/nationalists and highest echelons of Islamic theopolitical elites. Their aim is the creation of an Islamic imperium in the entire old-world landmass (eurabia where post-xtian whites become dhimmis - second-class citizens in their ancestral lands) and this will coincide with the anglostates (the five sisters - NZAUSUSACANUK) being 100 percent anglowhite. Latin/S. America to be ruled by white origin Hispanics who will continue to lord it over the indigenous browns of South America. India BhartVarsh Aryavarta moslems see as 'unfinished business' and will be part of the moslem caliphate where brownz in our ancestral lands will become slaves (again) - Guru Nanak started the work of kicking lowlyarabitch language out of Greater Historical India - these moslems desire to lord it over Bharat di Janata again - their eyes are on all of Kashmir and regaining all of Panjab, especially Fatehgarh region of Sirhand (head of India - sir is head and hand or hind is India). Now, why Brown people referred to as 'easter worshippers' instead of 'christians' - well 'Christian' has  or used to have connotations with pious godly people whereas these Lankans are just converts - only slaves convert after all - there is a racial pecking order in desert creeds with albino  uk white at top, then arab white, central Asian white etc.  Myself I keep distance from converted hindu xtians or white xtians because they admit they are born sinners - I prefer good sangat not that of born sinners. Islam and the racialists wish to reenslave everyone. More slaves alive than ever before in history. This is mostly de facto slavery -w ith the racialists and islam teaming up, we'll be de jure slaves. What we have on our side is Ultimate Truth. Desert creeds are hollow - created by and for born sinners and slaves. Dharmic religions offer spiritual and material liberation and complete freedom. Dharmic ethics is sublime - desert creeds only have lists of what not to do. THese desert creed adherents are descendants of old time Raksh mlecch populations who were kicked out of INdia for failing to adhere to Vedic standards of morality. Sikhi is the pinnacle of Aryadharmic Thought.  
    • It would be terrible. How would we have fared in a military ruled state? Pakistans always have military coups where dictators rule for 10+ years. Plus we would fear suicide bombers. I think pakistan was listed as the country with most suicide bombings in public places. Also taliban stopped women from attending schools in the frontier areas.  And we would live in a place where paan would be spit in the streets. 
×

Important Information

Terms of Use