Jump to content

How do you answer the claim that Sikhism plagiarized from Hinduism ..


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think the thuggees probably did a lot of human sacrifice but way way before the British got there, India was a weird place with really weird rituals! And practices,  It still is I guess lol     but by the time the British were there the thuggees were probably just thieves 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't eat meat, so this fat sullah at work told me that he's got a video of sikhs wearing "blue turbans" cutting a goats head off.  I knew exactly what he was gnna show me a video of, lucky he couldn't find it on his phone and kept looking through it.  There were other people there of other faiths and I just thought to myself if this guy pulls out a video of sikhs doing a public execution on a goat then how the hell am I supposed to explain it!   Luckily while he was tryna find it on his phone someone started another convo. 

How you supposed to explain a public execution of a goat in the context of your faith and belief? Iv answered every other question that's been thrwn at me but I don't think I would know how to explain that one if someone brings it up again ... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean my Christian friend told me that Jews used to sacrifice goats for god in the temple but then Jesus came and told people that there is no need for that and that God don't need a animal sacrifice, just like he told people that there no longer is need for male circumcision. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, puzzled said:

I don't eat meat, so this fat sullah at work told me that he's got a video of sikhs wearing "blue turbans" cutting a goats head off.  I knew exactly what he was gnna show me a video of, lucky he couldn't find it on his phone and kept looking through it.

Explain it by saying that they are a sect of Sikhs who practice beheadings so they can come after the jihadis. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

 

How do you answer if a hindu brother asked you "but you copied from hindu religion" 

The answer is that the ultimate source of gian (knowledge/wisdom) is God. People (prophets, avatars, rishis, etc.) obtain some level of gian. That's "Hinduism", or the Abrahamic religions.

That wasn't perfect, though. The Vedas are not perfect.

Guru Granth Sahib ji is perfect, however. The source was the same source (God), but Guru Sahib had a direct line to God because they were God.

Your Hindu friend doesn't have to accept this, but that's what we believe.

This also answers the question of similarities between "Hinduism" and Sikhism. The fact is, they got some things right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use