Jump to content

Were there dinosaurs in Satyug?


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

There was a cataclysmic event about 12,500 years ago around the end of the last ice age.

It is quite possible there were creatures that are now extinct that existed then.

I think creatures at that time were more similar to the animals of today   like the woolly mammoth, woolly rhino, early bigger forms of lions and deer   but nothing like the dinosaurs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/5/2019 at 6:20 PM, puzzled said:

early ape man and hanuman

Image result for ape manImage result for hanuman

I am beginning think that Hanuman was probably a form of human that previously existed.

Homo Neanderthals lived amongst Homo Sapiens and there have been numerous other humans such as Denisovians. 

There was a land bridge between South India and Sri Lanka that existed thousands of years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, puzzled said:

I think creatures at that time were more similar to the animals of today   like the woolly mammoth, woolly rhino, early bigger forms of lions and deer   but nothing like the dinosaurs. 

There were other large animals also. But these are drawings and may not have accurately depicted

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

I am beginning think that Hanuman was probably a form of human that previously existed.

Homo Neanderthals lived amongst Homo Sapiens and there have been numerous other humans such as Denisovians. 

There was a land bridge between South India and Sri Lanka that existed thousands of years ago.

Could be  but ram sita were human! That's the confusing part lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

If you look at it from the perspective that Zeus = Jupiter = Indra = Horus = Thor, etc., then it makes sense. Ram and Sita weren't Gujarati, lmao.

LOL     could be 

jesus mother was Egyptian, then she became black and then she became white

Image result for mary egyption goddess 

Image result for mary isis

Image result for mary isis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Sumerians and later Egyptians worshipped a Durga-esque deity; a female Goddess of war. There was an Akkadian personality who was named Naram-Sin. He is frequently depicted with the head of a lion, etc. Read up on ancient cultures and the deities they worshipped, and you'll begin to realise why our Guru Sahibs were so dismissive of the so-called Gods. It affirms your belief in the bachchans of our Guru Sahibs instead of creating doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use