Jump to content

Indian Christians


Big_Tera
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, puzzled said:

Christianity has actually failed in India. Despite the British ruling India, the millions of £££ sent to India, the missionaries etc  with all this effort Christianity should have a massive % in India. Many countries that the brits took over ended up becoming Christian.  But Christianity never took of in India like it did in Many other countries. Look at Africa, many African countries even adopted English. 

I think the reason is that they havnt indianized Christianity so it never took off.

Islam spread a lot though sufism, shrine worshipping, qwaalis etc which is very indianish    

You think 28 million is not massive? 

Just a note most christians in India are located near china. they also resemble chinese people. 

They are concentrated in the states below. 

Meghlaya

mizoram

manipur. 

These people dont look Indian at all but oriental. 

to a lesser extent they reside in tamil nadu and particulary goa where Portuguese ruled. 

These are the real shameful ones. They look completley Indian and are a discrace. 

I have met a few tamil christians where I live as there is a big tamil population here. 

Silly white washed people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Big_Tera said:

You think 28 million is not massive? 

Just a note most christians in India are located near china. they also resemble chinese people. 

They are concentrated in the states below. 

Meghlaya

mizoram

manipur. 

These people dont look Indian at all but oriental. 

to a lesser extent they reside in tamil nadu and particulary goa where Portuguese ruled. 

These are the real shameful ones. They look completley Indian and are a discrace. 

I have met a few tamil christians where I live as there is a big tamil population here. 

Silly white washed people.

For Indias population it probably is like 2%  compare that to the % of Christians in other countries that the brits ruled.

Those Chinese looking Indians are of tribal origin and were converted by the missionaries. Christian missionary influence is the worst in those north eastern states and it's worked. Wonder why ... 

Maybe the tribal traditions they followed were not compatible with today's time so the Christian missionaries worked and filled the gap. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, puzzled said:

For Indias population it probably is like 2%  compare that to the % of Christians in other countries that the brits ruled.

Those Chinese looking Indians are of tribal origin and were converted by the missionaries. Christian missionary influence is the worst in those north eastern states and it's worked. Wonder why ... 

Maybe the tribal traditions they followed were not compatible with today's time so the Christian missionaries worked and filled the gap. 

Good job they were not successful. Looks like the second wave of christian missionaries will be more successful. they probably are better and do alot of chrsitian parchaar then sikhs do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Christianity has been present in India for nearly 2000 years when St Thomas arrived on the shores of Kerala.

It depends on the type of Christianity in India.

The first batch of Christians in Kerala were Syriac Christians. 

The type you find in Goa are Catholics. If you have been to Goa, only 1/3 are Christian and they are located in the south of Goa.  They seem to be very pagan like, they almost believe in Jesus like a Murti. 

The Christians in the North East seem to be more evangelical with US Christian money pumped in.

It is this particular branch that is troublesome. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use