Jump to content

Message for the Christian Girl on the main thread


Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Christiangirl52 said:

The Jews chose. They hated Christ and wanted the Romans to kill him. 

 

If you ask a Jew about Jesus they consider him to be just a Jew who was mainly revolting against Roman rule.

What p***** them off  I believe was that he went on a rampage in the temple due to their money lending activities. 

Question is from an outsiders point of view it seems like a jewish issue. 

Why would the Roman bother about what is happening between Jews unless of course it impacts their rule. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest AjeetSinghPunjabi
40 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

If you ask a Jew about Jesus they consider him to be just a Jew who was mainly revolting against Roman rule.

What p***** them off  I believe was that he went on a rampage in the temple due to their money lending activities. 

Question is from an outsiders point of view it seems like a jewish issue. 

Why would the Roman bother about what is happening between Jews unless of course it impacts their rule. 

and muslims consider him a prophet , and his mother mary to be the most pious woman . Muslims also believe hes still alive in heaven and will return back on judgement day.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

and muslims consider him a prophet , and his mother mary to be the most pious woman . Muslims also believe hes still alive in heaven and will return back on judgement day.

 

I am beginning to think the origins of Islam is actually some heretical Christian sect not based in Arabia but further up north in the Levant. 

Which is why they they consider that Jesus is a prophet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest AjeetSinghPunjabi
Just now, Ranjeet01 said:

I am beginning to think the origins of Islam is actually some heretical Christian sect not based in Arabia but further up north in the Levant. 

Which is why they they consider that Jesus is a prophet. 

No !! (This is a long post based on my knowledge but interesting story) 

Islam is cousin sibling of Judeo-Christian religion. I am using the word "judeo - christian" because both judaism and christianity are the same lineage  . Jesus is an indirect descendant of Abraham/Ibrahim by his son Isaac whom he had through his first (respected) rich wife "Sarah/saayra" . Jews (Israelites) are descendants of Isaac (Ishaq).   Arabs (muslims) are descendants of Abraham by his elder son Ishmael (Ismail) whom he begot through his maid wife "Hagar" (Hajraa) 

ALL of these are biblical and therefore quranic figures. The story goes like Abraham wanted a son , but was not having any . So his first wife Sarah gave her maid Hagar to Abraham for marriage so he may beget a son. Hagar bore Ishmael (later on to become father of arabs and the lineage of muhammad) . BUT , here comes the twist , those both developed 'sautan' feelings soon. Sarah couldn't tolerate that this maid servant bore first son for her husband Abraham. And therefore Sarah said to Abraham to leave this 'sautan' and her son 'Ishmael' far away in the desert and Abraham did , telling the hagar and ishmael that this is god's will . So he left them in desert of mecca. !

Sarah meanwhile haves a son of her own . Names him Isaac (Ishaq) who would later go on to become the father of Israelities / jews. 

When Abraham asks god , what do you have in store for both of my sons ? God says "I will make Isaac a very prospering nation" and this promise of God is true because jews / israel is world leader in technology , etc. And Abraham asked "What about my son Ishmael?" God says "I will make him father over many nations. He will multiply many times" . And its true today because Muhammad was born in a lineage of Ishmael and muslims have many countries for them today. 

NOW , these 2 brothers are fighting on a global stage. Old sibling rivalry gone crazzyyy !

(Even maskeen ji makes a reference to this in one of his katha about 1984 op bluestar, referring to how jews and muslims are infact bros but at each other's throats and thereby silently implying , same is the case with Hindus and Sikhs too nowadays, because our gurus are anyways descendants of Raam via lav kush , its in dasam granth btw) . 

 

Now to answer your question , is Islam the sect of christianity . Nope . Muhammad was the promised 1,25,000-th prophet god had to send to the world . It was all a part of god's grand plan. So muslims are in a way right in saying "he is the seal of all prophets" because he was the "last prophet" , but not the last guru !! 

When god reveals quran to muhammad, there's obviously a recap of all the previous prophets in the region and hence the name of those biblical figures repeat up in the quran as a confirmation and a tribute to those noble souls. Its just like how "dhur ki baani" SGGS remembers Prahlaad , dhroo , and other indian historical figures. That doesn't mean we're a sect of hindu right ?

SAME happens in dasam granth when Guru Gobind Singh ji is revealed to by God that previous "avatars" all did karaamat to prove themselves brahm . God likes recapping u can say ! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

No !! (This is a long post based on my knowledge but interesting story) 

Islam is cousin sibling of Judeo-Christian religion. I am using the word "judeo - christian" because both judaism and christianity are the same lineage  . Jesus is an indirect descendant of Abraham/Ibrahim by his son Isaac whom he had through his first (respected) rich wife "Sarah/saayra" . Jews (Israelites) are descendants of Isaac (Ishaq).   Arabs (muslims) are descendants of Abraham by his elder son Ishmael (Ismail) whom he begot through his maid wife "Hagar" (Hajraa) 

ALL of these are biblical and therefore quranic figures. The story goes like Abraham wanted a son , but was not having any . So his first wife Sarah gave her maid Hagar to Abraham for marriage so he may beget a son. Hagar bore Ishmael (later on to become father of arabs and the lineage of muhammad) . BUT , here comes the twist , those both developed 'sautan' feelings soon. Sarah couldn't tolerate that this maid servant bore first son for her husband Abraham. And therefore Sarah said to Abraham to leave this 'sautan' and her son 'Ishmael' far away in the desert and Abraham did , telling the hagar and ishmael that this is god's will . So he left them in desert of mecca. !

Sarah meanwhile haves a son of her own . Names him Isaac (Ishaq) who would later go on to become the father of Israelities / jews. 

When Abraham asks god , what do you have in store for both of my sons ? God says "I will make Isaac a very prospering nation" and this promise of God is true because jews / israel is world leader in technology , etc. And Abraham asked "What about my son Ishmael?" God says "I will make him father over many nations. He will multiply many times" . And its true today because Muhammad was born in a lineage of Ishmael and muslims have many countries for them today. 

NOW , these 2 brothers are fighting on a global stage. Old sibling rivalry gone crazzyyy !

(Even maskeen ji makes a reference to this in one of his katha about 1984 op bluestar, referring to how jews and muslims are infact bros but at each other's throats and thereby silently implying , same is the case with Hindus and Sikhs too nowadays, because our gurus are anyways descendants of Raam via lav kush , its in dasam granth btw) . 

 

Now to answer your question , is Islam the sect of christianity . Nope . Muhammad was the promised 1,25,000-th prophet god had to send to the world . It was all a part of god's grand plan. So muslims are in a way right in saying "he is the seal of all prophets" because he was the "last prophet" , but not the last guru !! 

When god reveals quran to muhammad, there's obviously a recap of all the previous prophets in the region and hence the name of those biblical figures repeat up in the quran as a confirmation and a tribute to those noble souls. Its just like how "dhur ki baani" SGGS remembers Prahlaad , dhroo , and other indian historical figures. That doesn't mean we're a sect of hindu right ?

SAME happens in dasam granth when Guru Gobind Singh ji is revealed to by God that previous "avatars" all did karaamat to prove themselves brahm . God likes recapping u can say ! 

I don't know.

I am beginning to suspect something different. 

You should read up on Tom Holland on the origins of Islam. It asks more questions than it can answer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh
Quote

You have misunderstood that quote of Luke. It actually means when a person becomes a follower of Christ, they face enmity,  even hatred from  others. Even their own family. Just like Jesus faced cruel hatred before the Jews crucified Him. Luke is saying that being a Christian is no easy matter.

:) You've gone away...done a google search...and come back with a word for word copy of what a Christian website says. Nice one.  Just out of interest through......how does what you said above even one bit explain or relate to what Jesus said about him being here not to bring peace but to use the sword against people ?

Quote

It is a sad foolish thing to pick parts of the Bible that suit your argument without any understanding. I am sorry to see you do this. I would never attack your religion in this way. 

It is you, the Christian, who has chosen to come here (a Sikh forum) in order to peddle your religion. Have you ever ever once in your life seen or heard of a Sikh that has gone onto a Christian forum just to try and get those Christians to lose faith in their religion ?  If a Sikh ever sunk as low as that do you really believe the Christians on the Chtristian forum will welcome his attempts to convert them ?  What are you even doing here ?  And, more to the point, didn't you make a goodbye thread a couple of weeks ago ?  

Quote

By the way, re a previous set of quotes, the Old Testament is not Christian.

I started 3 messages directed at you clarifying at the onset that the passages in the old testament are relevant because passages in the new testament state categorically that jesus instructed all Christians to revere every thing written in the old testament as the divine truth....so why exactly are you now pretending not to know?

Quote

Jews follow the Old, even Moslems accept parts of the Old. They show great respect for the prophets like Abraham, and they revere Mary mother of Jesus.

Every one and his dog knows that and that is why, in my last message to you, I told you it would have been better for you to try and peddle your religion on a Muslim or Jewish forum as they have the same belief system as you. So why are you now repeating old stuff pretending it is new ?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest AjeetSinghPunjabi
4 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

I don't know.

I am beginning to suspect something different. 

You should read up on Tom Holland on the origins of Islam. It asks more questions than it can answer. 

In case of religion , I prefer to believe in the "mystical" and what the texts say ! 

Anyways lets put the abrahamics aside for a moment, in a similar vein, I am beginning to wonder "If sodhis and bedis are descendants of lav and kush respectively, then that why is NOT Ramchandar (father of lav and kush)  referred to in venerating words in SGGS or even in Sri Dasam granth for that matter ?" 

Thats even more fishy ! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

In case of religion , I prefer to believe in the "mystical" and what the texts say ! 

Anyways lets put the abrahamics aside for a moment, in a similar vein, I am beginning to wonder "If sodhis and bedis are descendants of lav and kush respectively, then that why is NOT Ramchandar (father of lav and kush)  referred to in venerating words in SGGS or even in Sri Dasam granth for that matter ?" 

Thats even more fishy ! 

In terms of Sodhi and Bedi being Punjabi Khatri which is derived from Kshatriya and Lav and Kush (who I believe were Kshatriya ) who founded Kasur and Lahore which is Punjab.

That is far more plausible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest AjeetSinghPunjabi
2 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

In terms of Sodhi and Bedi being Punjabi Khatri which is derived from Kshatriya and Lav and Kush (who I believe were Kshatriya ) who founded Kasur and Lahore which is Punjab.

That is far more plausible. 

So our ancestry goes back to the hindu god Raam !!?? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not encourage just the one religion from the start? The conflict, destruction, and kintu-prantu competing faiths would cause surely isn't worth multiple attempts at creating a path to God. A Creator, in his infinite wisdom and omniscience, would realise the Jews, Christians, and Musleh would be at each other's throats for millennia. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use