Jump to content

opinion on alex jones?


Recommended Posts

He admits he's an entertainer. It's tamasha with extremely rare nuggets of truth interspersed amongst the nonsense. I listened to him over a decade ago for a month or so, and I clocked his act. You won't get anywhere with beliefs in inter-dimensional lizards and shape-shifting demons. How's that going to convince your average person -- who isn't even ready to admit that democracy and partisan politics is a sham -- that there's something rotten with the world? What can the average person do about such things? All it does is engender a feeling of helplessness. Start with the so-called boring stuff: politics, sociology, contemporary history, etc. Read the work of guys like Noam Chomsky and Jon Pilger, and try to absorb what they're imparting about the System in a way that can be discussed and analysed. But always question, question, question, and keep to the forefront of your mind whether there are any issues that correlate to the teachings of Gurbani, because that's something I always do. The Occult is a subject that fascinates me, but you can't seriously attempt to make sense of the world by grounding your entire worldview in such wildly unreliable and unprovable matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MisterrSingh said:

He admits he's an entertainer. It's tamasha with extremely rare nuggets of truth interspersed amongst the nonsense. I listened to him over a decade ago for a month or so, and I clocked his act. You won't get anywhere with beliefs in inter-dimensional lizards and shape-shifting demons. How's that going to convince your average person -- who isn't even ready to admit that democracy and partisan politics is a sham -- that there's something rotten with the world? What can the average person do about such things? All it does is engender a feeling of helplessness. Start with the so-called boring stuff: politics, sociology, contemporary history, etc. Read the work of guys like Noam Chomsky and Jon Pilger, and try to absorb what they're imparting about the System in a way that can be discussed and analysed. But always question, question, question, and keep to the forefront of your mind whether there are any issues that correlate to the teachings of Gurbani, because that's something I always do. The Occult is a subject that fascinates me, but you can't seriously attempt to make sense of the world by grounding your entire worldview in such wildly unreliable and unprovable matters.

I like listening to Jordan Peterson lectures on his channel and Ben Shaprio and at school for world history we study the most important things in the 20th century like the world wars,Stalin,Hitler,Mao,Castro etc,though it feels so watered down.They really don't like getting into the interesting stuff  that gives insight into the the secrets of the inner circles these people had (although,there's a lot of base info required beforehand which they teach).For instance, Hitler had a book in his personal library tracking the location and size of the jewish population of cities across Canada and which media was in their favor.The full article:https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadas-archive-buys-1944-book-that-hints-at-nazi-plans-for-north-america      

That's not to mention all the unknown info the nazis hid or burned in the nazi book burnings or how hitler planned to drop helicopter cash all over britain to break their economy. Anyways,I was thinking of reading Geroge Orwell's work 1984 over summer,i'll start looking into Noam Chomsky and Jon Pilger in the meantime. I agree that Alex Jones has tidbits of truth here or there like with the dangers of a.i in the future,or the government trying to make half human/animal hybrids,or experimenting with electromagnetic waves and their effect on cognitive function,but like you mentioned,he's an entertainer;exaggeration and acting is key to selling his brand. 

What I like to think about is who's really running the world in the background.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i like watching ben shaprio vids too  iv subscribed to his channel lol     milo yiannopoulos is a jew as well, hes gay but has good vids too  hes funny 

even atheists like richard dawkins is interesting to listen too    hes actually agnostic 

you dont have to agree with someone to find them interesting to listen to lol   ben shaprios jewish idea of god is just very distant and far,  didn't like it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/13/2019 at 8:33 PM, puzzled said:

i like watching ben shaprio vids too  iv subscribed to his channel lol     milo yiannopoulos is a jew as well, hes gay but has good vids too  hes funny 

Aim higher than Shapiro and Yiannopoulous. Their respective schtick is about sowing discord and entrenchment; it's not about discovering the truth and devising solutions. These clowns are media whores. Shapiro is so lol. The issues he rallies against are 99% rooted in the socio-cultural policies pushed over decades by the intellectuals and elites of his race, yet he never ever mentions their role in the issues of today. A total charlatan who banks on the ignorance of his audience. It's like blaming a gunshot wound for blood loss that eventually leads to death but refusing to call out the guy who pulled the trigger. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

Aim higher than Shapiro and Yiannopoulous. Their respective schtick is about sowing discord and entrenchment; it's not about discovering the truth and devising solutions. These clowns are media whores. Shapiro is so lol. The issues he rallies against are 99% rooted in the socio-cultural policies pushed over decades by the intellectuals and elites of his race, yet he never ever mentions their role in the issues of today. A total charlatan who banks on the ignorance of his audience. It's like blaming a gunshot wound for blood loss that eventually leads to death but refusing to call out the guy who pulled the trigger. 

Talking about the stuff he speaks against including things like trannys, feminism  liberalism etc    weren't these the things that got Hitler to speak against the jews in the first place. Places like Berlin were ran by Jews. Berlin was like the s3x capital of Europe. The Jews opened and owned all the bars, clubs, brothels, casinos, strip clubs, flappers etc. Yet they made sure their own women were proper Jewish women in dress code and morals. Hitler saw how all of this was corrupting the youth of his country, while the children of the people who owned all these places were cultured. He wanted to bring Christians values and traditions back into his country.

He was a psycho  there is no doubt lol  but he saw the mess that his country was in and how morally corrupt it was becoming and it was mainly because of the jews and the stuff they were promoting, the very stuff that people like Ben Shapiro speaks up against. 

The way he carried out this operation was obviously a bloody mess lol 

Though many of the textbook holocaust photos are actually fake 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, puzzled said:

Hitler saw how all of this was corrupting the youth of his country, while the children of the people who owned all these places were cultured. He wanted to bring Christians values and traditions back into his country.

Bhai Sahib, I disagree with you, not trying to be rude.

Hitler was a naastak. He even went in church and said some foul words to the cross. He maipulated the church and tried to twist it (mainly protestanism as the Catholics weren't going to get rid of their faith). And there was quite a lot of opposition from the church anyway like Martin Niemoller and many others.

Hitler also believed that Jews were the least evolved and that they were the reason for evil in Germany e.g. unemployment. They actually weren't and it was just a stupid and manmukhi thing that Hitler did. He made it seem like there was a problem and then made a common enemy for the people so that's they would be hostile towards them and praise Hitler for somehow saving them from a problem that never really existed. Unemployment existed but not because of the Jews.

This is similar to Indira Gandhi in 1984 making a problem and dissolving government because she wanted to stay in power and because she knew that the Khalsa and Sikhi were prosperous and destined to rule (seeing from how the Singhs were fierce and were solid in our principles), she made us look a common enemy so India could give her praise for solving a fake problem to maintain her own power.

Secondly your point about the youth. Hitler was indoctrinating his youth (e.g. with Hitler youth and other groups etc.) training them for war and, teaching them that the aryans were the best and not actually helping at all to get rid of corruption. That is the opposite from clearing the rubbish in society.

Thirdly it wasn't the Jews fault for the corruption in traditional values. It was due to the relaxed attitude of the weimar republic that allowed for all of this.

2 hours ago, puzzled said:

Though many of the textbook holocaust photos are actually fake 

I don't think they are because why would someone have to lie about that. 

Sorry if I said something rude to you Bhai Sahib,

ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕਾ ਖਾਲਸਾ ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕੀ ਫ਼ਤਹਿ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/13/2019 at 3:33 PM, puzzled said:

i like watching ben shaprio vids too  iv subscribed to his channel lol     milo yiannopoulos is a jew as well, hes gay but has good vids too  hes funny 

even atheists like richard dawkins is interesting to listen too    hes actually agnostic 

you dont have to agree with someone to find them interesting to listen to lol   ben shaprios jewish idea of god is just very distant and far,  didn't like it 

I only watch Shapiro to find what masala is happening in politics, otherwise there are better intellectuals to watch.

Milo is a dead meme, he is a provocateur and has no substance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use