Jump to content

How should Sikhism deal with the upcoming potential of lab grown meat?


Guest Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Guest

Would it be fine to eat this meat as it does not involve killing an animal?

Would it not be fine as to grow this meat there was once a requirement for animal cells?

Would this be an issue that the Akal Takht would have to deal with?

Would love to hear your thoughts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Guest Guest said:

Would this be an issue that the Akal Takht would have to deal with?

The Akal Takhat, in one sense, does not ban meat, only halal meat.

You can argue against this, but for the sake of Panthic unity, this is generally considered the case.

This does not mean you should eat meat, however. All the organizations that favor bhagti (sant babas, Taksal, AKJ, etc.) favor refraining from meat.

So, if you were eating meat before, this is no different.

If you weren't, then you'd probably want to desist.

The reason is simply that vegetarians in the Sikh/Indian context view meat as Taamsik (creates negativity). It's not merely that meat is obtained by killing a jeev. It's also taamsik.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Prabh108 said:

.

Those who eat the remains of a violent death - slabs of animals-  are coarse, mean creatures and are, in the words of Schopenhauer 'living graveyards'.

 

 

 

But that is the point. Meat grown in the lab is not from a violent death. 

 

But personally, the composition of meat is very high protein and fat. So i think that has an affect on the body

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest GuestSingh
On 4/28/2019 at 8:21 AM, Not2Cool2Argue said:

But personally, the composition of meat is very high protein and fat. So i think that has an affect on the body

according to ayurveda, its tamasic which causes ignorance and laziness in our mind and body

also eating any living form thats lower than human may have bad karam so that can only affect our spirituality negatively

Link to comment
Share on other sites

।ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕਾ ਖਾਲਸਾ।।ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕੀ ਫ਼ਤਹਿ।

ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁਮਹਲਾ੧॥

Siree Raag, First Mehla:

ਲਬੁਕੁਤਾਕੂੜੁਚੂਹੜਾਠਗਿਖਾਧਾਮੁਰਦਾਰੁ॥

Greed is a dog; falsehood is a filthy street-sweeper. Cheating is eating a rotting carcass.

ਪਰਨਿੰਦਾਪਰਮਲੁਮੁਖਸੁਧੀਅਗਨਿਕ੍ਰੋਧੁਚੰਡਾਲੁ॥

Slandering others is putting the filth of others into your own mouth. The fire of anger is the outcaste who burns dead bodies at the crematorium.

ਰਸਕਸਆਪੁਸਲਾਹਣਾਏਕਰਮਮੇਰੇਕਰਤਾਰ॥੧॥

I am caught in these tastes and flavors, and in self-conceited praise. These are my actions, O my Creator! ||1||

ਬਾਬਾਬੋਲੀਐਪਤਿਹੋਇ॥

O Baba, speak only that which will bring you honor.

ਊਤਮਸੇਦਰਿਊਤਮਕਹੀਅਹਿਨੀਚਕਰਮਬਹਿਰੋਇ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ॥

They alone are good, who are judged good at the Lord's Door. Those with bad karma can only sit and weep. ||1||Pause||

ਰਸੁਸੁਇਨਾਰਸੁਰੁਪਾਕਾਮਣਿਰਸੁਪਰਮਲਕੀਵਾਸੁ॥

The pleasures of gold and silver, the pleasures of women, the pleasure of the fragrance of sandalwood,

ਰਸੁਘੋੜੇਰਸੁਸੇਜਾਮੰਦਰਰਸੁਮੀਠਾਰਸੁਮਾਸੁ॥

the pleasure of horses, the pleasure of a soft bed in a palace, the pleasure of sweet treats and the pleasure of hearty meals

ਏਤੇਰਸਸਰੀਰਕੇਕੈਘਟਿਨਾਮਨਿਵਾਸੁ॥੨॥

-these pleasures of the human body are so numerous; how can the Naam, the Name of the Lord, find its dwelling in the heart? ||2||

ਜਿਤੁਬੋਲਿਐਪਤਿਪਾਈਐਸੋਬੋਲਿਆਪਰਵਾਣੁ॥

Those words are acceptable, which, when spoken, bring honor.

ਫਿਕਾਬੋਲਿਵਿਗੁਚਣਾਸੁਣਿਮੂਰਖਮਨਅਜਾਣ॥

Harsh words bring only grief. Listen, O foolish and ignorant mind!

ਜੋਤਿਸੁਭਾਵਹਿਸੇਭਲੇਹੋਰਿਕਿਕਹਣਵਖਾਣ॥੩॥

Those who are pleasing to Him are good. What else is there to be said? ||3||

ਤਿਨਮਤਿਤਿਨਪਤਿਤਿਨਧਨੁਪਲੈਜਿਨਹਿਰਦੈਰਹਿਆਸਮਾਇ॥

Wisdom, honor and wealth are in the laps of those whose hearts remain permeated with the Lord.

ਤਿਨਕਾਕਿਆਸਾਲਾਹਣਾਅਵਰਸੁਆਲਿਉਕਾਇ॥

What praise can be offered to them? What other adornments can be bestowed upon them?

ਨਾਨਕਨਦਰੀਬਾਹਰੇਰਾਚਹਿਦਾਨਿਨਨਾਇ॥੪॥੪॥

O Nanak, those who lack the Lord's Glance of Grace cherish neither charity nor the Lord's Name. ||4||4||

Maharaaj has said where will the Naam sit. The only reason one choses to meat is for the taste. And even if the grew it in a lab, it's still going to take so many resources. How many more people are going to have to be exploited and feel hungry for some artificial meat?

Also, these heavy foods aren't digested as quickly as Daal etc. So how are Sikhs going to be able to wake up at Amrit Vela. We can't be eating meat for the taste of the tongue.

Siane Gurmukh Pyare will have more to say.

And by the way, Daal is tasty too.

।ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕਾ ਖਾਲਸਾ।।ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕੀ ਫ਼ਤਹਿ।

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use