Jump to content

Dealing with an angry wife


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

I can see the logic behind it (basically, the state has its sword of Damocles hanging precariously over the head of the male members of the family in order to threaten them into good behaviour and compliance), but legislation that holds so much potential for abuse is amazingly short sighted. I suppose certain types of societies require a radical approach to induce their populations into behaving themselves. Another victory for the feminists, lmao. 

The compliance of good behaviour  is in the wrong place.

The majority of the abuse for daughter -in-laws will be instigated by her mother-in-laws and sister-in-laws.

A lot of these issues are women-on-women .

A cruel daughter-in-law can cause problems for the male members of her-in laws.

This means that women can get away with anything and it is the men's responsibility. 

Potential scenario would be if a mother-in-law causes problem for her daughter-in-law then the men have to clamp down on her misbehavior because he will be financially liable.

He will have to assert his authority which again would be seen as abuse. 

Is it any wonder men won't do anything and just want a quiet life.

There will be consequences. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ranjeet01 said:

The compliance of good behaviour  is in the wrong place.

The majority of the abuse for daughter -in-laws will be instigated by her mother-in-laws and sister-in-laws.

A lot of these issues are women-on-women .

A cruel daughter-in-law can cause problems for the male members of her-in laws.

This means that women can get away with anything and it is the men's responsibility. 

Potential scenario would be if a mother-in-law causes problem for her daughter-in-law then the men have to clamp down on her misbehavior because he will be financially liable.

He will have to assert his authority which again would be seen as abuse. 

Is it any wonder men won't do anything and just want a quiet life.

There will be consequences. 

The sexual assault and rape clampdown was dead-on the correct thing to do on the part of Indian lawmakers. This proposed legislation seems like a logistical nightmare. It's unworkable to the point where it seems like a move to virtue signal to the West about India's emerging progressive social conscience, and to appease a growing section of Indian society that's in tune with Western leftist values as it pertains to gender politics. I'm not sure how such a policy will fly with what I assume is Modi's traditionally minded and conservative support base. I guess even in modern Indian politics the pretence of Left and Right wings is a pantomime for the masses, and the only genuine path that ensures prosperity, lol, is one of progressive globalism. The authoritarian, patriotic rhetoric most of Indian society seems to have swallowed since Modi became leader is a slick marketing and psychological trick. Fascinating times ahead for Bharat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

The sexual assault and rape clampdown was dead-on the correct thing to do on the part of Indian lawmakers. This proposed legislation seems like a logistical nightmare. It's unworkable to the point where it seems like a move to virtue signal to the West about India's emerging progressive social conscience, and to appease a growing section of Indian society that's in tune with Western leftist values as it pertains to gender politics. I'm not sure how such a policy will fly with what I assume is Modi's traditionally minded and conservative support base. I guess even in modern Indian politics the pretence of Left and Right wings is a pantomime for the masses, and the only genuine path that ensures prosperity, lol, is one of progressive globalism. The authoritarian, patriotic rhetoric most of Indian society seems to have swallowed since Modi became leader is a slick marketing and psychological trick. Fascinating times ahead for Bharat.

This particular legislation (it seems)has been designed to break down extended families into nuclear families. 

I think that is the goal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use