Jump to content

Wife graduates from passive-aggressive to full blown aggressive behavior and creates chaos in family


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 6/18/2019 at 4:25 AM, Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh said:

You people really do need to stop giving serious advice and answering questions asked by ajeetsinghpunjabi in multiple threads about his 'marriage'. He ruined a poor girl's life by not telling her that he is actually a homosexual and I think it is absolutely disgraceful that most of you here are treating him as if he is a good decent person. He's not. Not because he's a homosexual but for the fact that he has ruined a poor girl's life. For that, each and every one of us should treat him as the disgusting creature he is.

I am sorry. But i dont think he ruined the girls life. She is getting a kid. She is getting taken care of. 

What more does the woman need? Romance is such a western concept.

Also its not only Ajeets fault. The girl also agreed to the marriage. 

Also, we should be celebrating that our culture in india is able to "fix" gays or at least let them be part of society. The catholic church with their conversion therapy and the mormons who brainwash the gay men to marry and have families, could only wish they had the success indians do. The gay men themselves are choosing to marry and having kids. Ofc its due to societal pressure but in this case a good cause. 

I mean what other alternative do you want for gay men? To join the priesthood and then have scandals erupt years later as the catholics did? Because there r so many gay men in the catholic church, they have their own political group called the lavendar mafia. They vote for liberal reforms destroying the traditions of the church , and have tried to hide the sexual scandal and let the offenders go free. 

Or do u want there to be a gay scene like in USA where gay men have the highest rates of HIV and promiscuity? 

Ofc we can have gay marriage so they can be monogamous and not have HIV etc. But what about our religious ceremonies? Its just not possible..

So marriage without love on both sides is perfect. In the olden days, arranged marriages were such that u were thankful if ur chosen spouse was healthy. One of my great aunts in India, is still bitter because she was married of to an infertile man. Because he had mumps as a kid which attacks the testes. Another of my great uncles family only found out after their first kid that his wife has epilepsy. They were angry that the wifes family hid it. But what was the wifes family to do? Noone would have married the girl otherwise..

My 2nd cousin married a girl from canada with bone issues. They break with any weight. So she is wheel chair bound and now their daughter also cant walk. But he was glad to marry her so he could come to the west. 

Marriage has always been a transanction in the east. And each side tries to hide the defects and get the highest price. 

There is a mentally retarded man at our gurudwara. And he is getting married to a girl from india. The girl from india is quite ok with it. She will be able to help her whole family to the west and she says she will get to lead a pious life with no kids and do seva of the guy. 

So i dont get ur guys attitude. Wat else could he have done? I guess he could have told her during the engagement talk or advertised for a lesbian...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Not2Cool2Argue said:

I am sorry. But i dont think he ruined the girls life. She is getting a kid. She is getting taken care of. 

What more does the woman need? Romance is such a western concept.

Also its not only Ajeets fault. The girl also agreed to the marriage. 

Also, we should be celebrating that our culture in india is able to "fix" gays or at least let them be part of society. The catholic church with their conversion therapy and the mormons who brainwash the gay men to marry and have families, could only wish they had the success indians do. The gay men themselves are choosing to marry and having kids. Ofc its due to societal pressure but in this case a good cause. 

I mean what other alternative do you want for gay men? To join the priesthood and then have scandals erupt years later as the catholics did? Because there r so many gay men in the catholic church, they have their own political group called the lavendar mafia. They vote for liberal reforms destroying the traditions of the church , and have tried to hide the sexual scandal and let the offenders go free. 

Or do u want there to be a gay scene like in USA where gay men have the highest rates of HIV and promiscuity? 

Ofc we can have gay marriage so they can be monogamous and not have HIV etc. But what about our religious ceremonies? Its just not possible..

So marriage without love on both sides is perfect. In the olden days, arranged marriages were such that u were thankful if ur chosen spouse was healthy. One of my great aunts in India, is still bitter because she was married of to an infertile man. Because he had mumps as a kid which attacks the testes. Another of my great uncles family only found out after their first kid that his wife has epilepsy. They were angry that the wifes family hid it. But what was the wifes family to do? Noone would have married the girl otherwise..

My 2nd cousin married a girl from canada with bone issues. They break with any weight. So she is wheel chair bound and now their daughter also cant walk. But he was glad to marry her so he could come to the west. 

Marriage has always been a transanction in the east. And each side tries to hide the defects and get the highest price. 

There is a mentally retarded man at our gurudwara. And he is getting married to a girl from india. The girl from india is quite ok with it. She will be able to help her whole family to the west and she says she will get to lead a pious life with no kids and do seva of the guy. 

So i dont get ur guys attitude. Wat else could he have done? I guess he could have told her during the engagement talk or advertised for a lesbian...

How can a foundation be built on a lie, this has nothing to do with homosexuality,  if he is gay so what. The problem stems from the girl doesn't know, I don't know where it is written you can do anand karaj based on a lie. This guy went in front of Guru Granth Sahib ji and lied.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Redoptics said:

How can a foundation be built on a lie, this has nothing to do with homosexuality,  if he is gay so what. The problem stems from the girl doesn't know, I don't know where it is written you can do anand karaj based on a lie. This guy went in front of Guru Granth Sahib ji and lied.

 

Notcool2argue hit the nail on the head.

You think like a westerner in that you think in ideals. 

The eastern way is one based in pragmatism. 

An Anand Karaj to a western Sikh is based on ideals and means something more.

Anand Karaj to an Eastern Sikh is not necessarily based on an ideal and is more means to an end.

A woman's idea of marriage is based on practicality.

It is us men who are the idealists and romantics.

Ajeet's wife is moving more rural Punjab from an impoverished background to a middle class well to do family in a cosmopolitan city is a step up for her.

Women marry up. It's called hypergamy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Redoptics said:

How can a foundation be built on a lie, this has nothing to do with homosexuality,  if he is gay so what. The problem stems from the girl doesn't know, I don't know where it is written you can do anand karaj based on a lie. This guy went in front of Guru Granth Sahib ji and lied.

 

How did he lie? No one asks u if ur gay. I  think even if a guy admitted to being gay, noone would disqualify them from marriage in india. Parents and inlaws would just expect u to suck up ur wants and fantasies and to manage ur feelings and live a virtous family life. 

Girls have been married off for millenia without taking their wants into consideration. Marriage was their life occupation, there was no out to it. Now men too are bound to it, whether gay or not. Parents demand an heir esp if only son. My cousin wants to be behungum/ celibate baba but his parents wont hear of it. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Not2Cool2Argue said:

How did he lie? No one asks u if ur gay. I  think even if a guy admitted to being gay, noone would disqualify them from marriage in india. Parents and inlaws would just expect u to suck up ur wants and fantasies and to manage ur feelings and live a virtous family life. 

Girls have been married off for millenia without taking their wants into consideration. Marriage was their life occupation, there was no out to it. Now men too are bound to it, whether gay or not. Parents demand an heir esp if only son. My cousin wants to be behungum/ celibate baba but his parents wont hear of it. 

 

Not2cool2argue lol funny name, if you do not realise that a homosexual didn't tell a heterosexual of their sexuality before marriage,  is not a lie you need your head sorting out. Plus this done infront of our Gurus presence. This world has gone insane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

The eastern way is one based in pragmatism. 

The western way was also one of pragmatism until recently relatively speaking. "Love" seems to have crept into the equation around the time society was entering the period where individualistic feelings and desires were seen to be preferable to reason and foresight. And here we are. But wait... there's more! ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Notcool2argue hit the nail on the head.

You think like a westerner in that you think in ideals. 

The eastern way is one based in pragmatism. 

An Anand Karaj to a western Sikh is based on ideals and means something more.

Anand Karaj to an Eastern Sikh is not necessarily based on an ideal and is more means to an end.

A woman's idea of marriage is based on practicality.

It is us men who are the idealists and romantics.

Ajeet's wife is moving more rural Punjab from an impoverished background to a middle class well to do family in a cosmopolitan city is a step up for her.

Women marry up. It's called hypergamy. 

Yeah let's marry all our daughters to gays. Do you even know what the laavaan mean? 

"Ajeet's wife is moving more rural Punjab from an impoverished background to a middle class well to do family in a cosmopolitan city is a step up for her."

Yeah that's not based on maya. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Redoptics said:

Yeah let's marry all our daughters to gays. Do you even know what the laavaan mean? 

"Ajeet's wife is moving more rural Punjab from an impoverished background to a middle class well to do family in a cosmopolitan city is a step up for her."

Yeah that's not based on maya. 

You just proved my point. 

I know what lavaan means. You are an honourable person.

But because you follow the maryada and approach it in the right manner does not mean others will.

It is this one thing that is the flaw of us well-meaning Sikhs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

The western way was also one of pragmatism until recently relatively speaking. "Love" seems to have crept into the equation around the time society was entering the period where individualistic feelings and desires were seen to be preferable to reason and foresight. And here we are. But wait... there's more! ?

Marriage was always a pragmatic arrangement. The notions of it being a spiritual union  came much later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Not2Cool2Argue said:

How did he lie? No one asks u if ur gay. I  think even if a guy admitted to being gay, noone would disqualify them from marriage in india. Parents and inlaws would just expect u to suck up ur wants and fantasies and to manage ur feelings and live a virtous family life. 

Girls have been married off for millenia without taking their wants into consideration. Marriage was their life occupation, there was no out to it. Now men too are bound to it, whether gay or not. Parents demand an heir esp if only son. My cousin wants to be behungum/ celibate baba but his parents wont hear of it. 

 

On point!

Redoptics is finding this hard to grasp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use