Jump to content

Suleman Ghost


Singh1989
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 11/26/2020 at 10:43 AM, MisterrSingh said:

You disingenuous cowards and frauds always resort to deception in order to feel like you have the higher moral ground.

An assessment of a particular type of woman, of which there are many in today's age, is NOT an attack on all womankind. 

The distinction is lost on you clowns.

Down-vote away, it gives me strength! ?

Are u married? Or are u still at school?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

Is there a footnote or addendum for Chatropokhiyan that states, "Not All Women"? Or is it something that's considered to be assumed and not worth mentioning? 

You can play with words and claim others who highlight these issues are slandering all women, but nothing in what's been stated targets every single woman alive. You can lie and force through your agenda, but then that just reveals your spiritual posturing to be as hollow and meaningless as your arguments.

Do you know what statistical data is? It's drawing on information and data to present an inference based on various characteristics that are a broad occurrence, with the theory of probability, that doesn't take into account outlying extremes. 

It is as simple as that. And if this needs to be stated anytime a sensitive discussion occurs on this site, then you folk are in serious trouble up ahead.  

There are generalisations which are actually truth.

Here is a generalisation, men are physically stronger than women and are quite capable of overpowering one and getting his way if he so chooses to do so. Men are far more physically aggressive, that is a truth. But as men the vast majority of us will not do that.

No one will ever dispute that.

Women in general because they are less physically imposing understand this very well, so they have to deploy other things at their disposal, like cunning. To get what they need they will utilise the methods of manipulation. That is a fact. It is not that every woman will, but every woman could.

This is part of the base nature of women. This is not any hatred, this is just an objective reality.

Now if a man was to impose physically his will on any female, if caught doing so, will be in a physical altercation with other men as it is natural for men to protect those who are weaker.

However, how many women will defend a man (other than his mother or sister) if he is being psychologically or emotionally tortured by a highly cunning manipulative woman.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Koi said:

Sant Isher Singh Ji Maharaj verify this in one of their recorded kathas (available online), as do Sant Waryam Singh Ji Ratwara Sahib Wale in 2 of their kathas (also available online, the mention Suleman by name). I can't remember what the links are to their katha, as it's been many years since I heard them. They are available on gurmatveechar.com.

All true.

I think one of the reasons that people question the recording is because the ghost speaks Urdu though it claims to come from Persia, but people don't realize that ghosts have the ability to do pretty much anything! they can lie and deceive us too, and do some pretty evil things and ruin peoples lives. I think they lack that human compassion. 

Just because it is speaking Urdu does not mean its fake, ghosts/spirits can be very powerful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Khalsa2012 said:

I didnt actually mean it in insulting way. 

 

Btw dont have what?

 

 

Do you actual think its a good idea to ask your wife if she has been or thinking about cheating?  If you do, than you are very naive.  

The current generation has proven one thing.  Their basic desires are the forces driving them further away from institutions like religion.  Women have made it a righteous action to put their bodies on display by wearing skin tight clothes and/or clothes that cover very little.  The percentage of women who are from the age of 16 to 45 who don't dress in this manner or behave like self entitled twats is maybe 10%.  Then there are the ones who try to fit in but they also are a small minority,  maybe 5%.  Instagram even has the bibi with a dastar on her head but she is wearing revealing clothing or skin tight clothes to show case her body to men.  

Sikhi camps have been experiment centers.  These camps have revealed how women have degraded themselves to objects because they put themselves on display for men. Human instincts like sexual appeal was hidden by older generations.  Not for the current generations coming up.  They completely put it on display in the open and flaunt it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Akalifauj said:

Do you actual think its a good idea to ask your wife if she has been or thinking about cheating?  If you do, than you are very naive.  

The current generation has proven one thing.  Their basic desires are the forces driving them further away from institutions like religion.  Women have made it a righteous action to put their bodies on display by wearing skin tight clothes and/or clothes that cover very little.  The percentage of women who are from the age of 16 to 45 who don't dress in this manner or behave like self entitled twats is maybe 10%.  Then there are the ones who try to fit in but they also are a small minority,  maybe 5%.  Instagram even has the bibi with a dastar on her head but she is wearing revealing clothing or skin tight clothes to show case her body to men.  

Sikhi camps have been experiment centers.  These camps have revealed how women have degraded themselves to objects because they put themselves on display for men. Human instincts like sexual appeal was hidden by older generations.  Not for the current generations coming up.  They completely put it on display in the open and flaunt it.  

What u on about?? Why u quoting this to me??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use