Jump to content

media brainwashing


Guest guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Here's a list of media brainwashing, in western countries, to make people aware of it and so wake up (and become immune to it),  feel free to add your own observations:

1. to view all women (even young women/girls) as sex objects.  from a young age the media tries to put the idea in males heads that any female should be sized up for sexual attractiveness

2. for all women to view themselves are sex objects.  girls are taught from a young age that what others think of them and how much attention they get is a 'measure' of their 'worth'.   any woman who does not want to put excessive attention into her gender or sexuality is seen as an antisocial freak.  e.g. you can see how business wear  sold to women is more based on 'looking pretty' than practicality.

3. that black guys are attractive/virile/masculine- i don't know if this is because the white media feels sorry for them or else white- guilt, but this is another idea that is pure media fabrication.  i find it a little odd that 3/4 adverts on English tv depict white-woman/black-male couples.  if someone is going to say that blacks have larger anatomy well then even if that was true, it would still be 1. black 2. attached to a black guy.  so are you attracted to a person or a part of their bodies?  3. that wouldn't correlate to virility anymore than being tall would mean that someone would 'enjoy' sunbathing more.  

4. that having an extra-marital affair is benign/ desirable/ prestigious /normal.  to lust after a married person shows a severe lack of sense, and likewise for a married person to cheat on their own partner implies a clear lack of ethics.  there is nothing 'sexy' about stabbing someone in the back, betraying someone's trust.  you should think about the kind of character who would cheat on their spouse, and why then wouldn't they cheat on you?  do you think you are someone so wonderful that they couldn't resist?  the truth is they probably have insecurities,  as do you for chasing a married person in the first place.

5. that being a 'virgin' is wrong/ to be looked down on or as a freak.  firstly, virgins shouldn't have to label themselves or announce themselves as such, or else ' normal well adjusted well brought up person' would be a better title.  maybe non-married non-virgins should be the ones who label themselves- as trash, antisocial, degenerate etc.  (does not apply to rape victims, people genuinely taken advantage of and people who grew up in an environment where they were genuinely too stupid to know better).  

6. that the sex depicted on tv, in films, in music is accurate.  again false.  most artists/actors  are gays /lesbians, acting out an exaggerated scene written by poor writers, in front of a film crew. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh
On ‎6‎/‎29‎/‎2019 at 12:12 AM, Guest guest said:

Here's a list of media brainwashing, in western countries, to make people aware of it and so wake up (and become immune to it),  feel free to add your own observations:

1. to view all women (even young women/girls) as sex objects.  from a young age the media tries to put the idea in males heads that any female should be sized up for sexual attractiveness

2. for all women to view themselves are sex objects.  girls are taught from a young age that what others think of them and how much attention they get is a 'measure' of their 'worth'.   any woman who does not want to put excessive attention into her gender or sexuality is seen as an antisocial freak.  e.g. you can see how business wear  sold to women is more based on 'looking pretty' than practicality.

3. that black guys are attractive/virile/masculine- i don't know if this is because the white media feels sorry for them or else white- guilt, but this is another idea that is pure media fabrication.  i find it a little odd that 3/4 adverts on English tv depict white-woman/black-male couples.  if someone is going to say that blacks have larger anatomy well then even if that was true, it would still be 1. black 2. attached to a black guy.  so are you attracted to a person or a part of their bodies?  3. that wouldn't correlate to virility anymore than being tall would mean that someone would 'enjoy' sunbathing more.  

4. that having an extra-marital affair is benign/ desirable/ prestigious /normal.  to lust after a married person shows a severe lack of sense, and likewise for a married person to cheat on their own partner implies a clear lack of ethics.  there is nothing 'sexy' about stabbing someone in the back, betraying someone's trust.  you should think about the kind of character who would cheat on their spouse, and why then wouldn't they cheat on you?  do you think you are someone so wonderful that they couldn't resist?  the truth is they probably have insecurities,  as do you for chasing a married person in the first place.

5. that being a 'virgin' is wrong/ to be looked down on or as a freak.  firstly, virgins shouldn't have to label themselves or announce themselves as such, or else ' normal well adjusted well brought up person' would be a better title.  maybe non-married non-virgins should be the ones who label themselves- as trash, antisocial, degenerate etc.  (does not apply to rape victims, people genuinely taken advantage of and people who grew up in an environment where they were genuinely too stupid to know better).  

6. that the sex depicted on tv, in films, in music is accurate.  again false.  most artists/actors  are gays /lesbians, acting out an exaggerated scene written by poor writers, in front of a film crew. 

 

 

You know....day by day....I am becoming more and more convinced that I'm wasting my time here on this forum. More and more.....with each new thread....it's like I'm in a dream and by mistake I've wandered onto the youth wing forum of the Hitler's Evangelicals Party ?

Listen brother / sister (whatever gender you are).....your racial origins lay in a land (India) where programming, advertising, posters etc are a thousand times more 'sexualised' than they are in what you call "the west". You come from a land with adverts for 'Sexologists' all over the place and religious epics full of sex stories and even ancient temples depicting sex positions. In other words, whilst I don't doubt that your motives for saying what you did stem from a good moral place you placing the blame on the 'west' shows that you don't have a very mature understanding of who the real sex objectifiers actually are.  As for the need you felt to include the issue of black men in your post ?   Well, only you can explain where that has come from

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

^thanks.  except when they went to attack the person and their culture, in which case they put a sikh. 

 

8.  that casual sex is a desirable thing.  how is performing intimate acts with someone you don't even know meant to be a desirable prospect?  this person could have the most revolting or disturbing habits for all you know.

9.  that getting drunk/smashed/whatever they call it is a desirable prospect.  where is the intelligence in losing control of your body and mind?   even more so if you are female (vulnerable to rape/abuse etc).  and you are paying money to make yourself feel ill?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/28/2019 at 4:12 PM, Guest guest said:

Here's a list of media brainwashing, in western countries, to make people aware of it and so wake up (and become immune to it),  feel free to add your own observations:

1. to view all women (even young women/girls) as sex objects.  from a young age the media tries to put the idea in males heads that any female should be sized up for sexual attractiveness

 

Every one of your points is great. 

Who are you? Get a free account and keep posting. Please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8. In advertising, but also in general entertainment such as situational comedy, the father is often portrayed as an incompetent, out of touch, absent minded, or generally dim individual dominated by the feminine energy in the household. He's a figure of derision to varying degrees whose main purpose is to symbolise a demoralised and confused male in a world that values men for nothing but what they provide for their dependents in a material sense. 

On the other hand the mother is shown to be a wise, level-headed, well-organised general who ensures the family unit is kept ticking along as she merrily runs around putting out figurative fires or preventing any from taking place. 

In recent times, advertising and certain entertainment formats depart from this template of portraying adult males in this manner only when it's implied that the man in question is homosexual. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MisterrSingh said:

8. In advertising, but also in general entertainment such as situational comedy, the father is often portrayed as an incompetent, out of touch, absent minded, or generally dim individual dominated by the feminine energy in the household.

Good point. The marketing departments of big corporations and ad agencies are dominated by women (and homosexuals in the mix). I don't if I want to say "it's only natural" that they would portray men as idiots, but that's what they are in fact doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Media Sexploitation: The Hidden Implants in the Mass Media by Richard Zakia is an excellent book to understand this subject in a meticulous, logic / rational based manner. 

Ignore voices who serve to undermine any attempt to observe and note these occurrences. They want you to continue to labour under the shroud of ignorance; makes you easier to control so you continue stumbling around in a mental stupor where very little of life makes sense, therefore making you susceptible to all and everything directed at you for the purposes of keeping you asleep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/29/2019 at 12:12 AM, Guest guest said:

3. that black guys are attractive/virile/masculine- i don't know if this is because the white media feels sorry for them or else white- guilt, but this is another idea that is pure media fabrication.  i find it a little odd that 3/4 adverts on English tv depict white-woman/black-male couples.  if someone is going to say that blacks have larger anatomy well then even if that was true, it would still be 1. black 2. attached to a black guy.  so are you attracted to a person or a part of their bodies?  3. that wouldn't correlate to virility anymore than being tall would mean that someone would 'enjoy' sunbathing more.  

I truly believe that this one is actually a strategy to improve/widen the gene pool of the white population and avert inbreeding. If you look at the swing from colonial times to now, we've had a complete u-turn (by the English) about the notion that breeding within a community somehow preserves some genetic superiority, to the idea that some diversity in genes improves a society and protects against the negative effects of inbreeding. Those black people's genes have passed a fiery test when goray enslaved them (through genocide, starvation, and physical abuse etc.) that meant that only the seriously strong genes survived. And remember a lot of those genes were already widely seeded by white men (on the sly) on slave ships and plantations - I think they are trying to incorporate them back into their society? It's probably easier to assimilate them in too, compared to us brownies and our 'zany, archaic and exotic beliefs/religion/culture'? lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest
On 7/2/2019 at 6:51 AM, BhForce said:

Every one of your points is great. 

Who are you? Get a free account and keep posting. Please.

thank you for your kind words and positive feedback.  it is very encouraging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Stop talking about caste. That is anti-sikh of u to say " a rajput sikh has double duty". No, we are all Sikh and have the same duty as one body. I only included that because people wrongly assosciate being a Tarkhan with having a starched pagh. I am actually fully Jatt (I said Rajput cos my Massirji is one so my family has them too, all of which use starch). That's actually disgraceful to say that any one caste has more martial responsibility than the others and tells me you don't know much about Sikhi at all. And the only rlly famous Rajput Sikh I know of was Milkha Singh ji, who also wore a starched turban as you can see from his pictures. (shahi paggs are king based like rajputs, dumallas are the warrior ones like the soldiers. Since rajputs are both kings and warriors, they can easily fit into either but I'm actually jatt so this don't rlly concern me tbf)
    • Is that from Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj/Sikh Rehat Maryada? Cos if not then it doesn't apply to me (I'm a Sikh of the Guru and nobody else). Bro don't be stupid 'standing up will hurt your head'? Sachi? It's position of my shoulder blades when tying. Dumalla is very entry level turban (not hard to tie) but to pooni, pinch and accurately place larrhs on a Punjabi Style pagg like mine takes a long time for most. Dumalla is not a real pagg it is a DASTAR (Warrior style). A pagg is double patti stitched turban (short for Pagrri, a common man's turban style). But Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj said "tie your turban layer by layer" but he didn't say it has to be each day i don't think. Starched turbans are tied once and then hold shape to be worn again without retying for about a few weeks to a few months depending on how much mawa you use.  YES THEY GAVE THEIR LIFE FOR A TURBAN. I WOULD TOO. I HAVE ONE, I TIE ONE AND I EVEN TAKE THE EXTRA STEP OF STARCHING IT. A STARCHED TURBAN IS NO LESS A TURBAN THAN ONE TIED EVERY DAY.   Also I've read your content you like to act like a warrior and all so how about this: in today's world, nobody has swords on the street. An attack on a Singh today is likely gonna be a racist trying to remove ur pagg.  If it gets knocked off or unwound then ur screwed. But a starch turban can be called a "warrior turban" imo cos they prolly won't fall off but if they do then you can just put it on again. Same if you witness an assault or stn outside ur house at night you can put the pagg on and run to help (like a sant sipahi) instead of going out Nanga Sirf in the night  
    • THIS QUESTION IS ABOUT UNARMED COMBAT, NOT SHASTAR VIDIYA (the science of WEAPONS). But let's pretend you didn't fail the first step of answering a question (to read it carefully): 1) Bro if that's not from Gurbani I don't wanna hear it. I ONLY accept hukam from the 10 Gurus of Sikhism and Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj. Not Bhindranwale, not anyone else and defo not 'Rattan Singh Bagghu' who lived in the 1700s wayy after Guru attained Joti Jot at Nanded (he's a historian). 2) Shastar Vidhaya actually means 'the science of weapons', but today ppl view it as literally the form of Nihang combat we see today. 'Preserve shastar vidiya' could just mean preserving the martial culture (which we do).
    • I know a Rajput Uncle who is a councillor and he wears the regular panjabi pagh. I wouldn't know he is a rajput because coul easily fit into any panjabi sikh or jatt background. But I can tell from his surname.  However when I look at proper Rajputs they were warriors and kings with those kind of paghs, similar to wearing dumallas or shahi turbans, some looked like Nihang Singhs! And Rajput background sikhs were involved in shastarvidiya training with Guru Hargobind and Guru Gobind Singh, as well as becoming their sikhs.    A rajput background sikh has double responsibilities to maintain turban and also training shastar. I think a Nihang Singh type look is more suitable for a sikh from Rajput background than any patiala shahi or average panjabi pagh
    • "Preserve Shastar Vidiya any way you can."(Rattan Singh Bhangu, Siri Guru Panth Parkash, ed. Dr Balwant Singh Dhillon, 36)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use