media brainwashing

[Guest guest]

10.  that having/ belonging to a "community" is evil and wrong and that people should 'rebel' against their community and destroy it so as to mix into the hodgepodge that the media controls and so approves of.  that you should hate your values, and you are "brave" to marry someone outside your community.   does it not occur to the sheep that run to do the bidding of the media in this respect, that to belong to a community and have a culture and values etc is actually a nice, civil thing.   and how is being mindlessly reckless and defiant something to be exited about and admire?

11.  that 'mixed race marriage' are elevated, and 'special'.  more like two people with low self esteem and desperate for attention.  would your partner still be interested in you (and vice versa) if you were from the same race/community/religion?  or are you/they just some 'trophy' to make you feel 'special'?  and please explain why modern society puts a higher value or pure-breed dogs as opposed to mixed dogs which are called 'mongrels' and given lesser value (even despised?).  so basically modern society has higher standards for dogs then humans...

12.  that watching pornography is 'normal' and 'acceptable'.  ok, maybe many a teenage boy (or girl) has curiosity about sex (that doesn't make it ok for them to watch it though), but aside from that what purpose does this serve?  some more points 1) the sex depicted is often exaggerated but also shown in a manner that is aggressive and demeaning to women 2) theres a statistic that 90% of female porn actors are previous victims of sexual abuse (hence the industry is exploiting women with psychological issues  and low self esteem for its 'entertainment'.). 3) would you like to see your own family members acting porn?  so isn't a little hypocritical to watch others engaging in it?  4)  there also seems to be a high suicide rate among porn actors, (https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/porn-industry-reeling-after-five-deaths-in-only-three-months/news-story/e779587b387f0ad2b3ae71ec45f0c631).  so by all means, enjoy this 'entertainment' then other people get so depressed making that they commit suicide...and you can observe for yourself what effect watching pornography has on your mind, your energy and your way of life.

14.  that a woman that has premarital sex is 'liberated' and 'independent'.  'liberated' from what exactly?  giving up your body for people who don't care about you to use, and getting off on the fact?  more like enslaved into base desires of someone else.   and what are your choice of partners?  muslims and blacks?  not exactly known for their great views on female emancipation.  not so much 'liberated' then as taken advantage of.  didn't 'media moghul' Harvey Weinstein admit that he was bitter that he couldn't get female attention before he had money and influence?  thats the kind of person who you are becoming mental slaves to.  i wouldn't call that 'independant'.  also, didn't the poster-woman for 'liberation' Madonna tell that she was raped at gun point before she came famous.  do you not think that consequently effected her views on her body and sex in a negative way?

15.  the concept of 'alpha male'.  this sounds like something from a David Attenborough documentary on moneys- "now the alpha male pisses on the tree".  why do you people then run after and admire this concept?  are you a monkey or a human being? and what exactly is an alpha male?  someone callous and insensitive with some kind of faux-confidence?  thats what impresses you?  wouldn't it be better to admire someone with virtues, or a good heart, or mental strength, or someone who really is indifferent to others opinions due to their 'gian' (wisdom).  why would you want to look up to some <banned word filter activated> who merely 'acts' tough?

[MisterrSingh]

On 7/6/2019 at 12:14 AM, Guest guest said:

12.  that watching pornography is 'normal' and 'acceptable'.  ok, maybe many a teenage boy (or girl) has curiosity about sex (that doesn't make it ok for them to watch it though), but aside from that what purpose does this serve?  some more points 1) the sex depicted is often exaggerated but also shown in a manner that is aggressive and demeaning to women 2) theres a statistic that 90% of female porn actors are previous victims of sexual abuse (hence the industry is exploiting women with psychological issues  and low self esteem for its 'entertainment'.). 3) would you like to see your own family members acting porn?  so isn't a little hypocritical to watch others engaging in it?  4)  there also seems to be a high suicide rate among porn actors, (https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/porn-industry-reeling-after-five-deaths-in-only-three-months/news-story/e779587b387f0ad2b3ae71ec45f0c631).  so by all means, enjoy this 'entertainment' then other people get so depressed making that they commit suicide...and you can observe for yourself what effect watching pornography has on your mind, your energy and your way of life.

Porn is a direct attack on the moral fabric of a society. The damage inflicted on the individual is so great, because it affects our perception of these matters on a psychological basis which then leads to a host of sexual dysfunctions when exposed to this nonsense on a long-term basis, i.e. only being capable of climax when solo; voyeuristic self-pleasure at the sight of what is essentially other people enjoying intercourse, etc. 

Also, it's worth noting that certain genres of pornography are deliberately  pushed by the makers of these productions in particular decades / eras in order to "program" society into accepting the degeneracy people see in these films, and accordingly encourage the recreation and normalisation of those activities in our everyday lives. With every successive generation the limits of what occurs in these films are pushed that little bit further until the mind can only boggle at the soul destroying rubbish people will seek in the future because of what existing outrageous forms of porn society has desensitized itself to in pursuit of the next big rush.

Do we know what the most popular genre of porn is at this moment? It's mother / step-mother and son interactions. That's the next taboo the degenerate social engineers of humanity want to bring into the open. 

A guess at the background of the producers of this degeneracy who are growing wealthy by pushing this gandh onto the world?  

[dallysingh101]

On 7/6/2019 at 12:14 AM, Guest guest said:

15.  the concept of 'alpha male'.  this sounds like something from a David Attenborough documentary on moneys- "now the alpha male pisses on the tree".  why do you people then run after and admire this concept?  are you a monkey or a human being? and what exactly is an alpha male?  someone callous and insensitive with some kind of faux-confidence?  thats what impresses you?  wouldn't it be better to admire someone with virtues, or a good heart, or mental strength, or someone who really is indifferent to others opinions due to their 'gian' (wisdom).  why would you want to look up to some <banned word filter activated> who merely 'acts' tough?

Yeah, but genuinely strong, confident guys (not those putting on a act) are going to attract women like no one's business.  There are evolutionary reasons for this. Most females (not all) openly say this is something they find majorly attractive in blokes. That isn't to confuse this type of male with someone who is excessively overbearing, and a control freak - which can easily be done. I think most women want strong men that know how to challenge them over a pushover. Sure some women do prefer someone who doesn't challenge them at all, but many do.  

I think, in the current uncertain times, even more so than ever. That phase we had of homosexual driven media representations of 'metrosexuals' being some preferred model of 'masculinity' was only going to last so long. 

[jkvlondon]

4 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

Porn is a direct attack on the moral fabric of a society. The damage inflicted on the individual is so great, because it affects our perception of these matters on a psychological basis which then leads to a host of sexual dysfunctions when exposed to this nonsense on a long-term basis, i.e. only being capable of climax when solo; voyeuristic self-pleasure at the sight of what is essentially other people enjoying intercourse, etc. 

Also, it's worth noting that certain genres of pornography are deliberately  pushed by the makers of these productions in particular decades / eras in order to "program" society into accepting the degeneracy people see in these films, and accordingly encourage the recreation and normalisation of those activities in our everyday lives. With every successive generation the limits of what occurs in these films are pushed that little bit further until the mind can only boggle at the soul destroying rubbish people will seek in the future because of what existing outrageous forms of porn society has desensitized itself to in pursuit of the next big rush.

Do we know what the most popular genre of porn is at this moment? It's mother / step-mother and son interactions. That's the next taboo the degenerate social engineers of humanity want to bring into the open. 

A guess at the background of the producers of this degeneracy who are growing wealthy by pushing this gandh onto the world?  

Some people will get triggered but the porn industry is owned and run under jewish production and direction. They are hypocrites of the highest order with a wish to destroy all other cultures and countries so their zionistic fantasy of world control and domination comes about. Does Israel recognise the multi genders, homosexuality, fornication or access to porn for their people? Not really.

[Guest guest]

On 7/2/2019 at 11:14 PM, dallysingh101 said:

I truly believe that this one is actually a strategy to improve/widen the gene pool of the white population and avert inbreeding. If you look at the swing from colonial times to now, we've had a complete u-turn (by the English) about the notion that breeding within a community somehow preserves some genetic superiority, to the idea that some diversity in genes improves a society and protects against the negative effects of inbreeding. Those black people's genes have passed a fiery test when goray enslaved them (through genocide, starvation, and physical abuse etc.) that meant that only the seriously strong genes survived. And remember a lot of those genes were already widely seeded by white men (on the sly) on slave ships and plantations - I think they are trying to incorporate them back into their society? It's probably easier to assimilate them in too, compared to us brownies and our 'zany, archaic and exotic beliefs/religion/culture'? lol 

this argument implies that you admire blacks and their genes?

the native white populations of England are already pretty diverse (celts, romans, vikings etc).  they don't marry their siblings or cousins (so no inbreeding).  a certain percentage of whites also have genetic immunity to the HIV virus (not known amongst non-whites).  non-whites have higher rates of heart disease, diabetes, and vit d deifiencey.  so your 'scientific' argument about blacks having robust genes is nonesense.  also if this was about genetic diveristy, you would think the scientific establishment would be promoting it, not the media.

also why don't they show as many white male- black female couples?  and if whites want to admire blacks, that is their choice, but why force it on other groups?

[Guest guest]

50 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

Yeah, but genuinely strong, confident guys (not those putting on a act) are going to attract women like no one's business.  There are evolutionary reasons for this. Most females (not all) openly say this is something they find majorly attractive in blokes. That isn't to confuse this type of male with someone who is excessively overbearing, and a control freak - which can easily be done. I think most women want strong men that know how to challenge them over a pushover. Sure some women do prefer someone who doesn't challenge them at all, but many do.  

I think, in the current uncertain times, even more so than ever. That phase we had of homosexual driven media representations of 'metrosexuals' being some preferred model of 'masculinity' was only going to last so long. 

 

a genuinely confident person does not base their confidence on the reactions of others (including how many 'women' they attract).  

if your confidence is about how many women you can attract, its not real confidence, just a 'rouse' to attract women.  a woman (or admirer of such a person) would have to be pretty stupid to fall for that.  basically, they lack confidence yourself so are impressed by the appearance it in others.

a lot of women are stupid, insecure and sheepish.   if this is what you attract with your 'confidence' whats the value in it?

e.g. you can see all those 'pick up' artists that teach to put women down etc to get them attracted to you.

(btw not to sound sexist.  women probably see traits in a lot of men that are stupid and that other women exploit).

if you want to think independently you need to leave numbers game behind.

[MisterrSingh]

6 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

Some people will get triggered but the porn industry is owned and run under jewish production and direction. They are hypocrites of the highest order with a wish to destroy all other cultures and countries so their zionistic fantasy of world control and domination comes about. Does Israel recognise the multi genders, homosexuality, fornication or access to porn for their people? Not really.

Nothing to see here. Just another coincidence. You're hateful for noticing and drawing conclusions.

[MisterrSingh]

The mainstreaming of incest. It doesn't happen via one avenue (porn) because relying on a single source to promote these ideas isn't enough for it to filter down into the mass consciousness so that eventually something that was once considered beyond the pail creeps into normalcy by humanising the participants. So they use a mainstream source that reaches a wide enough audience that porn never will.

Someone remind me of the most popular TV show of the past 10 years that featured a central brother and sister duo who'd been in a sexual relationship since they were youngsters. Oh yes, Game of Thrones.

[jkvlondon]

13 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

The mainstreaming of incest. It doesn't happen via one avenue (porn) because relying on a single source to promote these ideas isn't enough for it to filter down into the mass consciousness so that eventually something that was once considered beyond the pail creeps into normalcy by humanising the participants. So they use a mainstream source that reaches a wide enough audience that porn never will.

Someone remind me of the most popular TV show of the past 10 years that featured a central brother and sister duo who'd been in a sexual relationship since they were youngsters. Oh yes, Game of Thrones.

Publishing houses also predominately of same management have been doing a roaring trade in such storylines since before Virginia Andrews 'Flowers in the Attic' . Child abuse and incest case victims are coerced into writing books as 'catharsis' its all BS , schaudenfreude and getting sick thrills from others pain.prime example is the 'child called it' series , which some say has raked in millions for the author and publishing house

[Redoptics]

17 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

Publishing houses also predominately of same management have been doing a roaring trade in such storylines since before Virginia Andrews 'Flowers in the Attic' . Child abuse and incest case victims are coerced into writing books as 'catharsis' its all BS , schaudenfreude and getting sick thrills from others pain.prime example is the 'child called it' series , which some say has raked in millions for the author and publishing house

Just watch any music video,  they are littered symbolism,  lady in red, virgin sacrifices,  blood sacrifices,  illuminati etc etc.