media brainwashing

[Guest guot singh]

On 7/9/2019 at 10:20 AM, MisterrSingh said:

The mainstreaming of incest. It doesn't happen via one avenue (porn) because relying on a single source to promote these ideas isn't enough for it to filter down into the mass consciousness so that eventually something that was once considered beyond the pail creeps into normalcy by humanising the participants. So they use a mainstream source that reaches a wide enough audience that porn never will.

Someone remind me of the most popular TV show of the past 10 years that featured a central brother and sister duo who'd been in a sexual relationship since they were youngsters. Oh yes, Game of Thrones.

ok

[dallysingh101]

On 7/8/2019 at 11:58 PM, Guest guest said:

this argument implies that you admire blacks and their genes?

I was trying to understand this from whites perspective. But, if you're asking, if I think about it, I do admire how black people survived what was essentially a good few centuries of genocide and slavery. Let's compare African-Americans (for instance), with the current state of the original inhabitants of what is now the US. The former are infinitely more assertive despite centuries of hell and suppression - even given all the subtle and no so subtle racism in the US. 

 

Quote

the native white populations of England are already pretty diverse (celts, romans, vikings etc).  they don't marry their siblings or cousins (so no inbreeding).  

That is quite possibly a relatively recent thing in my opinion. We know the upper classes were into inbreeding. I've been reading Dickens a bit lately too, and there a  few examples of cousins marrying therein too - and it is mentioned without any guilt like it was normal. Don't think that what you see today is indicative of past norms. 

 

Quote

a certain percentage of whites also have genetic immunity to the HIV virus (not known amongst non-whites).  non-whites have higher rates of heart disease, diabetes, and vit d deifiencey.  so your 'scientific' argument about blacks having robust genes is nonesense.  also if this was about genetic diveristy, you would think the scientific establishment would be promoting it, not the media.

It has other support too. Look at how pedigree dogs are infinitely more prone to health issues compared to mongrels for example. The white scientific community, isn't some noble group of people trying to promote fairness and equality btw, they have their own bigots - probably even more so than in the wider population. Look at how top universities in England get exposed for serious discrepancies in their retention and support for black males for example. Having known a few guys of such backgrounds who've been to these institutes, I can say that these experiences are not exaggerated - probably actually suppressed and under represented in the media.

And go out in England, see how English girls drool over light-skinned 'mixed race' guys.

Are you a white pretending not to be btw? 

Quote

also why don't they show as many white male- black female couples?  and if whites want to admire blacks, that is their choice, but why force it on other groups?

I agree. Maybe it's the individual masculinity they admire then? It's obvious that they are curiously fascinated by black males (physically) and feel threatened by them at the same time too. Maybe this is a way for them to reduce a potential threat - by breeding them out? Actually their fascination and promotion of these things are very unlikely to be down to a single simple factor - it's probably multifaceted - an element of which is subconscious. Maybe it's related to the mass covert homosexuality amongst the anglos too  - so they have a secret fascination with perceived bbcs? Who knows exactly what goes on in these people's heads? 

Why don't you try not watching white media so much if it bothers you that much? 

[dallysingh101]

On 7/9/2019 at 12:05 AM, Guest guest said:

 

a genuinely confident person does not base their confidence on the reactions of others (including how many 'women' they attract).  

if your confidence is about how many women you can attract, its not real confidence, just a 'rouse' to attract women.  a woman (or admirer of such a person) would have to be pretty stupid to fall for that.  basically, they lack confidence yourself so are impressed by the appearance it in others.

a lot of women are stupid, insecure and sheepish.   if this is what you attract with your 'confidence' whats the value in it?

e.g. you can see all those 'pick up' artists that teach to put women down etc to get them attracted to you.

(btw not to sound sexist.  women probably see traits in a lot of men that are stupid and that other women exploit).

if you want to think independently you need to leave numbers game behind.

I think you're just running around in circles and stating the obvious whilst repeatedly missing my point. I don't get what you are arguing about?

I'm not talking about anyone faking confidence like you keep rabbiting on about. I'm talking about genuinely physically confident guys. The women running around them is just a by product of them being that way. Yes, it's true that some guys faking it attract certain types of females too - but I wasn't talking about them. 

And if you think all or most women can be simply conceptualised like you've done above.......

Try reading CP and see what you learn from that. 

[KhalistanYouth]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but  didn't punjabi people come from Persia?

Anyways if you want these "black-genes" Just do some slavery work for a couple generations.

African-americans are built different from Africans.

[dallysingh101]

On 7/13/2019 at 1:00 AM, KhalistanYouth said:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but  didn't punjabi people come from Persia?

Okay, You're wrong. Panjabis are more than just immigrant Persians.

 

Quote

Anyways if you want these "black-genes" Just do some slavery work for a couple generations.

That's a stupid statement. First thing, LOTS of the Africans/African-Americans that did this didn't survive, they died. The ones we see are the descendents of the ones that didn't.

Quote

African-americans are built different from Africans.

Not all, some Africans are very similar in physique to AA, like Nigerians. But the differences we do see can be down to mixed blood and natural selection from the horrendous experience of slavery. 

[KhalistanYouth]

On 7/15/2019 at 4:50 PM, dallysingh101 said:

Okay, You're wrong. Panjabis are more than just immigrant Persians.

 

That's a stupid statement. First thing, LOTS of the Africans/African-Americans that did this didn't survive, they died. The ones we see are the descendents of the ones that didn't.

Not all, some Africans are very similar in physique to AA, like Nigerians. But the differences we do see can be down to mixed blood and natural selection from the horrendous experience of slavery. 

Lol  

The descendants obviously had better stock from their slave ancestors 

and Punjabi people are more than pesians yes

Punjab itself was influenced from many, e.g turks,persians,greeks, etc and our own culture of course.

[dallysingh101]

4 hours ago, KhalistanYouth said:

Lol  

The descendants obviously had better stock from their slave ancestors 

and Punjabi people are more than pesians yes

Punjab itself was influenced from many, e.g turks,persians,greeks, etc and our own culture of course.

So basically, you don't really know what you are talking about and have a habit of making sweeping statements that have more holes in them than swiss cheese......

 

 

[KhalistanYouth]

On 7/18/2019 at 6:40 PM, dallysingh101 said:

So basically, you don't really know what you are talking about and have a habit of making sweeping statements that have more holes in them than swiss cheese......

 

 

I'm sure that slavery did impact genes or so.

[KhalistanYouth]

On 7/18/2019 at 6:40 PM, dallysingh101 said:

So basically, you don't really know what you are talking about and have a habit of making sweeping statements that have more holes in them than swiss cheese......

 

 

And Punjabi's are more than "immigrant persians"

we're our own people that has historically been influenced by other cultures due to our rulers, don't deny history.

[dallysingh101]

13 minutes ago, KhalistanYouth said:

You do realize slavery did IMPACT their genes and everything?

Yes. But don't forget social factors that influenced how their society developed too. These things aren't small. Losing a parent in childhood (in whatever way) is proven to have major implications for the majority of people who experience it. Given what they were facing with the constant violence,  moving around and being totally unsettled due to slavery is a BIG factor too. 

Anyway, you care to try and explain why apnay in certain areas of Canada are doing the exact same thing people are castigating kalay for? I mean the drug dealing and apnay on apnay violence.