Jump to content
Guest Jigsaw_Puzzled_Singh

Gurhant Gnostic and Dallysingh100 - The Esquisite Love between Man and Man

Recommended Posts

Guest Jigsaw_Puzzled_Singh

So......Gurjant Gnostic is off quality control and is now posting on the main page of this forum again,  For some strange reason, with unconfortable homoerotic undertones,  he seems to be using half of his messages to praise Dallysingh100 to the heavens. Dallysingh100 if you all remember is the man on this forum who admits himself that he has his hair-cut and is not a Singh but somehow thinks he is qualified to lecture everybody else here on the qualities of a 'warrior'. Dallysingh100 if you all remember is the man that is so obsessed with caste hate (not hatred of caste but actual hatred of a caste) that well over 50% of his messages contain hatred and venom for what he calls 'pendus' which is his way of distinguishing those Sikhs from rural backgrounds as opposed to his family's urban background. Dallysingh100 is, if you remember, the man that habitually threatens violence on other forum members and only stopped once a funny cartoon articulating who he really was started to circulate.  GurjantGnostic, if you remember, is the white pale skinned man here playing at being a Sikh but, being a white man, possesses that inherent white trait of thinking he has the moral and intellectual high ground over you brown people - enough to lecture you on what you the brown people should be thinking.

This then, begs two questions:

1) What was Dallysingh100's involvement in bringing GurjantGnostic back on posting priviledges that GurjantGnostic feels he just can't stop thanking and praising Dallysingh100 enough on numerous messages ?

2) What is it that connects / unites 2 hair-cut fakes ?

 

image.png.7ee5966fffe5d37a2b2a5d85414f956e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

I think the pagh wale could learn a thing or two from us simple mone. Just because you got a pagh and beard does not suddenly mean you know it all. Iv come across alot of pagh wale these days that act arrogant when they dont know jack .

I never respect anyone for wearing a turban as I have come across so many fools in turbans that I now know to judge someone on their inner personality and not their outward appearance. 

Not saying all pagh wale are like this. Many take advantage of the pagh as it is repected. But behave very badly. They then cover it up with a turban to make everyone think their all high and mighty with morals ect. 

I've given so many pagh wale a good thapar over the years for tarnishing the paghs identity. Dont let me do the same to you jagsaw if I find your also tarnishing the pagh identity. 

Edited by Big_Tera
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jigsaw_Puzzled_Singh
5 minutes ago, Big_Tera said:

I think the pagh wale could learn a thing or two from us simple mone. Just because you got a pagh and beard does not suddenly mean you know it all. Iv come across alot of pagh wale these days that act arrogant when they dont know jack .

I never respect anyone for wearing a turban as I have come across so many fools in turbans that I now know to judge someone on their inner personality and not their outward appearance. 

Not saying all pagh wale are like this. Many take advantage of the pagh as it is repected. But behave very badly. They then cover it up with a turban to make everyone think their all high and mighty with morals ect. 

I've given so many pagh wale a good thapar over the years for tarnishing the paghs identity. Dont let me do the same to you jagsaw if I find your also tarnishing the pagh identity. 

There is nothing Big Tera - ABSOLUTELY NOTHING - that makes a pagh walla a better human being than a mona. Absolutely nothing. I am merely pointing out absurdities. Here's a list of some absurd things:

  • It would be absurd for me, as a dastar wearer, to go on the internet and lecture moneh people on hair-styling tips and styles.
  • It would be absurd for a man with a muslim name but eats bacon and ham, drinks alcohol, never prays and never goes to the mosque....to go onto a muslim forum on the internet and give muslims lessons on the quaran.
  • It would be - and indeed is - absurd for a man that does not possess the minutest strength of character and moral fortitude needed to keep his kes to go on the internet and constantly lecture other Sikhs about Sikhism and criticise them for being 'weak' and 'un-warrior' like (Dallysingh100)

Now, I like you Big Tera. You are what you are (which is a bit of an unintellectual prat) but you're very honest and open about it. Dallysingh100, on the other hand, is a con man. He can't live a certain way in real life and so he has invented an alter ego for the cyber world. On this forum, on which there have been many fakes over the years, he is the king of the fakes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jigsaw_Puzzled_Singh
Just now, Dsinghdp said:

Dallysingh101 has a lot of knowledge on Sikhi.

Brother, compared to you, even Big Tera "has a lot of knowledge on sikhi" so lets keep things in perspective. Dallysingh100 is clearly not an uneducated fool. He knows how to structure a sentence intelligently and uses that basic literacy skill to manipulate the majority of people on this forum (i.e those who possess small and gullible minds).  That's what con-men do and he does it well. It's up to you to wise up a little intellectually and actually analyse his messages. In reality he actually knows nothing and has never had anything new to add. His messages are nothing more than thinly veiled attacks on all Sikhs from a rural background and his standard modus operandi is to visciously attack with profanities and threats of violence anyone that dares challenge a single thing he says. Because, you see, that con-man nature of his can only take him so far. When it comes to the crunch, the fake alter-ego he has created for the cyber world should be considered a machine and is not able to compute the human reaction of politely disagreeing with other people and accepting the points of views of others as valid. For you to start realising your own intellectual potential Dsinghdp, when you read Dallysingh100's messages about being a great 'Singh Warrior' you need to picture in your mind the reality that the message is actually being written by a man that looks exactly like Mr Patel from Wembley or Mr Ramnachand from Bangalore. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Dsinghdp said:

Dallysingh101 has a lot of knowledge on Sikhi.

Brother I'm just trying to explore this beautiful/powerful thing I've inherited. I don't think I'm any sort of expert. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Khalsa Raj

Dally is indeed obsessed with Pendus and Jatts, either he suffers a serious inferiority complex or is secretly envious. Either way he has a mental struggle accepting that the key figures and successes in most of Sikh History were down to the very Pendus he loves to mention and give airtime to on majority of his posts. He is indeed obsessed.

Next he thinks he is REAL tough and incessantly harps on about training. I mean are you small in that department, what are you missing in life, for sure you're lacking in various departments.

It's ok to be a mona and have knowledge that surpasses even Amritdharis, but unless you've given yourself to the Guru, you're simply a hypocrite, still deluded by Maya yet preaching Sikhi.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about you Jagsaw, how do you explain your shocking volte face? Singing one sad sycophantic song for years and years and then abruptly singing the opposite tune and going on like you never espoused the completely opposite opinion only a short while ago? Is that the kind of backbone you've got?

Mental mate. 

Stop forgetting to take the meds. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest GuestSingh

bruv dally is cool.

as mentioned above he does have a lot of knowledge on sikhi but also panjabi culture which is always relevant here. he shares it n has contributed a lot to this forum as have u. dnt always agree his posts or urs either but this place wudnt be as informative wivout em.

as for white boy, try not to let him get to u.

all but one person ignored his recent posts so tht shud tell u somethin.

but 100% agree wiv u on his thinkin, intentions n clear hypocrisy.

n thts y hes still on qc.

Edited by GuestSingh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gurjant is white??? 

That explains alot. 😌

Edited by Big_Tera

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Big_Tera said:

Dont let me do the same to you jagsaw if I find your also tarnishing the pagh identity

A Punjabi remake of the Matt Damon espionage trilogy: The Pagh Identity; The Pagh Supremacy, and The Pagh Ultimatum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/23/2019 at 4:57 AM, Guest Jigsaw_Puzzled_Singh said:

So......Gurjant Gnostic is off quality control and is now posting on the main page of this forum again,  For some strange reason, with unconfortable homoerotic undertones,  he seems to be using half of his messages to praise Dallysingh100 to the heavens. Dallysingh100 if you all remember is the man on this forum who admits himself that he has his hair-cut and is not a Singh but somehow thinks he is qualified to lecture everybody else here on the qualities of a 'warrior'. Dallysingh100 if you all remember is the man that is so obsessed with caste hate (not hatred of caste but actual hatred of a caste) that well over 50% of his messages contain hatred and venom for what he calls 'pendus' which is his way of distinguishing those Sikhs from rural backgrounds as opposed to his family's urban background. Dallysingh100 is, if you remember, the man that habitually threatens violence on other forum members and only stopped once a funny cartoon articulating who he really was started to circulate.  GurjantGnostic, if you remember, is the white pale skinned man here playing at being a Sikh but, being a white man, possesses that inherent white trait of thinking he has the moral and intellectual high ground over you brown people - enough to lecture you on what you the brown people should be thinking.

This then, begs two questions:

1) What was Dallysingh100's involvement in bringing GurjantGnostic back on posting priviledges that GurjantGnostic feels he just can't stop thanking and praising Dallysingh100 enough on numerous messages ?

2) What is it that connects / unites 2 hair-cut fakes ?

 

image.png.7ee5966fffe5d37a2b2a5d85414f956e.png

Yeah I don't know whatever beef y'all got but this isn't a reality show, so who cares.

And if you ever take a threat from somebody on the internet serious, maybe the internet isn't cut out for you.

Lol especially if they're from the UK.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/23/2019 at 1:57 AM, Guest Jigsaw_Puzzled_Singh said:

So......Gurjant Gnostic is off quality control and is now posting on the main page of this forum again,  For some strange reason, with unconfortable homoerotic undertones,  he seems to be using half of his messages to praise Dallysingh100 to the heavens. Dallysingh100 if you all remember is the man on this forum who admits himself that he has his hair-cut and is not a Singh but somehow thinks he is qualified to lecture everybody else here on the qualities of a 'warrior'. Dallysingh100 if you all remember is the man that is so obsessed with caste hate (not hatred of caste but actual hatred of a caste) that well over 50% of his messages contain hatred and venom for what he calls 'pendus' which is his way of distinguishing those Sikhs from rural backgrounds as opposed to his family's urban background. Dallysingh100 is, if you remember, the man that habitually threatens violence on other forum members and only stopped once a funny cartoon articulating who he really was started to circulate.  GurjantGnostic, if you remember, is the white pale skinned man here playing at being a Sikh but, being a white man, possesses that inherent white trait of thinking he has the moral and intellectual high ground over you brown people - enough to lecture you on what you the brown people should be thinking.

Are u sure you are "woke"? Isnt judging someone based on their skin color- the liberals bogeyman- "racist"? 

And you cant have it both ways, that he is a white person so shouldnt be telling us what to do as sikhs. But if he is trying to be a sikh, and calling out people for their negative views on other races, that he thinks he is better than us. 

You have honed ur skills at insulting and degrading ppl to the level of a sass in indian dramas. Make sure u use it for good. And in western society, arguments especially intellectual ones should be made without resorting to fallacies such as ad hominem attacks etc. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol, I'm not white I'm Irish. Apparently off qc, yay didn't know,

Jagsaw bro, you never came to visit when you were in cali. I miss you bro. 

Big hug @Big_Tera

Love @ all

Lol @ these guys, hah

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The US are only the in Syria region because they had their arms twisted to get rid of ISIS. The reason? Because Russia was there doing that job. Russia was good buddies with Asad's regime and they are allied with Iran. USA are not on good terms with Iranian regime and wants to get rid of them. Asad is Druze (they are a Shia sect) and this minority rules Syria which has a Sunni majority as well as your regular Shias and Christians. There is no way that the US wants Iran to have influence in the region. Lebanon has a very large Shia  population,  that is where Hezbollah come from and they have traditionally allied with Syria regime and Iran (Shia boys united). Hezbollah rule South Lebanon and have given Israel loads of grief in the past. Saudi cannot stand Iran and they don't like Syria. They want to play a part in dismantling Iran's influence. ISIS has had a lot of their insurgents from Saudi, they want to get rid of Asad. Iran in turn supports the Houti rebels (Shias in Yemen) and Shia majority areas in Saudi which is coincidently where Saudi's oil fields are based. Iraq which is now run by Shia's in the south and Kurds in the north. Saddam Hussain was Sunni and the Iraqi Sunni are no longer in power.  That is where a lot of ISIS support comes from as well as Saudi and as well as Turkey who also hate Syria. They think Israel is complicit in this as they all have common interests.  So you have Syrian regime + Iran + Hezbollah + Yemeni Houthis + Iraqi Shias + Russia vs Saudi+ Israel + Turkey. Turkey has been growing it's Islamic ness in the last few decades and with Erdogan are flexing their muscles, they want to be Ottomans again. The Ottoman Empire controlled large parts of the Middle East and controlled Mecca and Medina, Islam's holy sites. Iraq is controlled in the north by the Kurds. Kurds are not Arabs, they are an Iranian speaking people. It is a de-facto Kurdish republic. The pisses off the Turks because they do not want their Kurds in Turkey to get any ideas. Also there is a lot of oil in the Kurdish controlled Iraq. With instability in Syria and the Asad regime not being in total control, it means that there is a vacuum in power. It stands to reason that the Kurds in Syria will fight back against ISIS and it stands to reason that the Kurds in Iraq will support them. So you end up with two Kurdish controlled regions. One in Iraq and one in Syria. The Turks are s****** themselves. What happens if these two regions become one breakaway country? They have oil too. The Kurds in Turkey will want to breakaway. (The govt in Turkey don't like calling the Kurds Kurds, they want to call them Mountain Turks.) The only thing they don't have is the pipelines to export it. That is why Turkey was interested,  they can control that area and build oil pipelines to the Mediterranean so they can export the oil. Erdogan's family is complicit in the traffiking of the oil supplies. Turkey's Turk population is experiencing a serious decline, the Kurds have a higher birth rate therefore the Turks are scared that the Kurds may become a majority.  What I have explained so far is far too simple and it goes beyond even that.
    • Here is some history about the Ottomans. They were a turkic people like the Mughals.  Like the Mughals who bred with Rajput women, the Ottomans did the same with the locally conquered women: https://www.thoughtco.com/ottoman-sultans-were-not-very-turkish-195760
    • Thread from an Albanian friend of mine (Albania is a formerly part of the Ottoman Empire in the Balkans) so he has far better understanding than I ever will.
      There are aspects that can be related to our people and the history of partition (but this guy does not like Greeks or Turks very much), but I suspect if you ask a Greek he may have different point of view:


       Okay thread.

      Topic:

      TURKEY HAS "LEGAL RIGHT" TO ETHNIC CLEANSE THE KURDS.

      Not a joke.

      1/

       During the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire, ethnic groups were spread out across the empire.

      Once ethnic states started to appear with the creation of Greece by Germans in 1827, a chain reaction ensued across Ottoman Rumelia (aka Land of Romans), the mess started.

      2/
       Long story short, Bulgaria, Serbia, Romania, Montenegro, Albania, Turkey etc were created over the course of 100 years from the Roman Revolution in 1822, now known as the Greek Revolution.

      3/ During these 100 years, from 1822 to 1923, (literally 101 years), was to find a way to pinpoint all borders in order to avoid ethnic conflicts, within each new ethnic state multiple ethnicities resided, which itself had multiple religions, which was normal for the ottomans.

      4/
       There were Orthodox Greeks and Muslim Greeks, orthodox bulgarians and muslim bulgarians, orthodox serbs and muslim serbs, orthodox albanians and muslim albanians, orthodox turks and muslim turks.

      And all were spread UNEVENLY across the collapsing empire.

      5/
       In the meantime what we now call Western Europe, was going through an ethnic consolidation as well, as German elite was trying to create Unified Germany, which they achieved in 1871, excluding the Austrians, who refused to be Germans.

      6/ Long story short, by late 1870s onward, Ottoman elite was getting together with the western elite, aka Big Powers, to solve the mess.

      It started with Congress of Berlin in 1878, then Treaty of London in 1913, it ended with Lausanne Treaty in 1923.

      7/ During these years, Balkan Wars occurred and the weakest links were sacrificed to achieve some kind of managed peace in the Balkans.

      It started with Otto von Bismarck, the first Chancellor of the unified Germany declaring:

      "The Albanian nation does NOT exist".

      8/
       So, the only way to find any solution was to assert that X nation does NOT exist at all or does not exist in X area, there was no other way.

      9/
       So, that is what they did.

      What is now called Greece, it used to be a mixture of Greeks, Albanians, Bulgarians, Vlachs (Romanians) and Turks.

      Baaaaam, nobody else exists, only Greeks. Decision made.

      10/
       The only reason that Albanians now exist, is because at last moment a Hungarian prince raised the issue with the Austro-Hungarian emperor, that if Albanians do not exist, then Serbia/Russia would have access to the Adriatic.

      The Emperor freaked out. Albanians exist he said.

      11/
       Long story short, after 101 years, all comes down to the Lausanne Treaty in 1923 between Greece and Turkey.

      12/
       In the Lausanne Treaty, it was codified the practice of deciding whether a nation exists or not.

      Venizellos and Mustafa Kemal, one orthodox greek and the other muslim greek (Ataturk spoke greek fluently), simply decided that any orthodox was Greek and any muslim was Turk.

      13/
       So, within Greece, per Lausanne Treaty now codified as international treaty supported by big powers, all orthodox were forced to be hellenized, all albanians, bulgarians, vlachs and turks.

      14/
       Per the treaty as well, codified as international law, anybody inside Turkey, whether turks, greek, albanian, bulgarian, or ....KURDISH, simply did not exist, there were only Turks in Turkey.

      15/
       Hence per the treaty, anybody had to be Turkified, like in Greece anybody had to be hellenized.

      The problem here, and I understood this by reading Taleb saying "scale matters", the problem is that it takes long time to Hellenize and Turkify large populations.

      16/
       Based on past practice now codified in international law, Greece and Turkey intensified now openly what they say "population exchange", which was LEGAL MUTUAL ETHNIC CLEANSING, now codified in international law.

      17/ Greece, per the law, ethnic cleansed all muslims from Greece, except for the ones in Thrace, which was part of the treaty.
        Turkey per the law ethnic cleansed all orthodox from Turkey, except the ones in Constantinople, which was part of the treaty, they moved to Greece. 18/ These ethnic cleansing did not happen instantly, it took decades to be completed, literally decades. In 1945, Greece ethnic cleansed "muslims" from Chameria per the Lausanne Treaty, they were all Albanians. 19/ Yugoslavia, made a deal with Turkey in the 1960s to have about 400k "muslims" moved to Turkey. The offer from Ankara was 1 horse for 3 muslims (no joke, as they were all Albanians). The serbs replied: take them all for free, as long as all albanians leave. 20/ The tricky part of this one is that Turkey wanted these 400k Albanians to displace the Kurds in East Turkey. Of course Albanians refused, they settle in West Turkey. So, the plan to ethnic cleanse the Kurds by use of Albanians, failed. 21/ In 1999 Abdullah Ocalan, Kurdish fighter against Turkey was arrested in Kenya after the Greek government delivered him into the hands of the Turkish gov, fully complying with the Lausanne Treaty. 22/ So, as you see, it is Turkey's right legally, per lausanne treaty, to ethnic cleanse the Kurds. 23/ The only difference here is USA. USA does NOT recognize international treaties which come against its interest, it is in the US constitution. Hence, USA disregarded the Treaty of London of 1913 giving Kosovo to Yugoslavia, simply invaded KS away from Serbia. 24/ USA is disregarding Lausanne Treaty as well now, by organizing the Kurds together against Turkey. It takes time, but they will do it, as Turkey is now basically an enemy. 
      Give it 20-25 years, just like with Kosovo. 25/ END  
       
    • Erdogan in June 2015:

      “I’m addressing the whole world. Whatever the cost it might be, we will never allow a state established in Northern Syria”

      Why does he not want a Kurdish state in Northern Syria? I know why, does anybody know why?
    • What caste pride do I have? Only Juts have caste pride? Let's get back to the question of Kurds. Instead of looking at the situation from the filter of only British colonialism and caste, what do you actually understand about the whole situation of the Kurds in it's entirety? Do you understand the history of the Kurds, their relationship with the Ottoman Empire, their role in exterminating the Armenians from Eastern Anatolia (1915 genocide) the carving up of former Ottoman lands (sandjuks) in the picot sykes agreement. The effect of the Lausanne Treaty between Greece and Turkey. The role of the Young Turks and Ataturk. The relationships of the Kurds in the 4 countries I have mentioned with Shias/Sunni Arabs/Turks in those respective countries. The relationships and groups within those Kurdish groups, the demographic changes in Turkey. The effect of Erdogan and his family's relationship with the intention of supporting ISIS so that the gas/oil pipelines can be transmitted through Turkey. That is just the tip of the iceberg. There are whole geopolitical implications here that involve Iran, Iraq, Eastern Med, Russia, parts of the caucuses, even parts of the Balkans are impacted. It is very complex and far more nuanced. Compared to that, subcontinental politics is a picnic. You'd be really shocked to see the level of hatred between these people. A real eye opener. You might make some synergies with struggles of our panth with the Kurds but that is an over-simplification.  If you want to do rajniti, you have to understand everything in it's entirety and not what suits us.      
×

Important Information

Terms of Use