Jump to content

Jimmy Saville, Jeffrey Epstein, Madeline McCann & Elite Chomo Rings


Recommended Posts

If only Icke hadn't come to prominence with the Son of God / lizard people schtick. That's tainted him. All the relatively recent socio-cultural and political "predictions" he made 15 or 20 years ago are bearing fruit. I'm certain he had some form of immense spiritual awakening back in the day, and his mind and senses processed it as him being a part of the Divine, but the way he phrased it made it seem like he was nuts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

If only Icke hadn't come to prominence with the Son of God / lizard people schtick. That's tainted him. All the relatively recent socio-cultural and political "predictions" he made 15 or 20 years ago are bearing fruit. I'm certain he had some form of immense spiritual awakening back in the day, and his mind and senses processed it as him being a part of the Divine, but the way he phrased it made it seem like he was nuts. 

Funny I was thinking something similar too. Maybe his 'lizard people' conception comes from interpreting his experiences from a western mindset, whereas culturally we might conceptualise such 'lizards' as daints or asuras, i.e. in mythological terms, his own cultural doesn't have that scope so he's manifested that force/energy as 'lizard people'???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

Funny I was thinking something similar too. Maybe his 'lizard people' conception comes from interpreting his experiences from a western mindset, whereas culturally we might conceptualise such 'lizards' as daints or asuras, i.e. in mythological terms, his own cultural doesn't have that scope so he's manifested that force/energy as 'lizard people'???

That's what it seems to me. Spot-on.

I'm guessing he found himself on the astral plane - and he saw what we'd term as abnormal - things that are only seen on that plane of existence. As you say, he had no frame of reference beyond his western mindset at the time, and he ran with 'lizard people'. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

That's what it seems to me. Spot-on.

I'm guessing he found himself on the astral plane - and he saw what we'd term as abnormal - things that are only seen on that plane of existence. As you say, he had no frame of reference beyond his western mindset at the time, and he ran with 'lizard people'. 

I think the triggering factors for his 'revelations' are a lot less mysterious. I think he was privy to certain rumours, or open secrets due to his career in the media. He probably picked up more and more snippets of information until he realised he was actually seeing the surface of something much bigger and started looking into that. 

His outlandishness in the early days might be down to the shock of the shear evil and extent of what he was uncovering. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dallysingh101 said:

I think the triggering factors for his 'revelations' are a lot less mysterious. I think he was privy to certain rumours, or open secrets due to his career in the media. He probably picked up more and more snippets of information until he realised he was actually seeing the surface of something much bigger and started looking into that. 

His outlandishness in the early days might be down to the shock of the shear evil and extent of what he was uncovering. 

Saville being a paedo abuser was well known in the BBC.

The reason Saville got away with it for so long is because he threatened to take down / expose all the other paedos in the establishment and the BBC.

This is one of the things that I do not get.

Some people say karma gets you in your lifetime.

How did Saville not suffer for his sins in his life.

Could be because of all the charity work offset all the despicable things he did.

Maybe he is getting what he deserves in the afterlife. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Saville being a paedo abuser was well known in the BBC.

The reason Saville got away with it for so long is because he threatened to take down / expose all the other paedos in the establishment and the BBC.

This is one of the things that I do not get.

Some people say karma gets you in your lifetime.

How did Saville not suffer for his sins in his life.

Could be because of all the charity work offset all the despicable things he did.

Maybe he is getting what he deserves in the afterlife. 

 

Well, whichever way it works I don't think Karma works like that. Too many people have gotten away with too much for that. I don't think charity and doing the horrendous stuff he did cancels each other out like that. And the 'charity' itself just seems like strategies to access more prey and obfuscate his personality. 

I don't think Saville threatened to out anyone. I think it was just a quietly accepted norm in higher british society of the time. Tolerated. These things were considered minor or non-issues. Come on, when you're out there in the real world 'open-secrets' aren't exactly uncommon. I think people knew about him, and a lot more. 

Thatchers known to have knowledge of certain paedos and still gave them prominent government positions. The high ranked political paedos Ronnie Kray 'associated' with were never charged. One successfully suing a newspaper for defamation. 

See the below about open secrets. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

This is one of the things that I do not get.

Some people say karma gets you in your lifetime.

How did Saville not suffer for his sins in his life.

Could be because of all the charity work offset all the despicable things he did.

Maybe he is getting what he deserves in the afterlife. 

 

This is something I've been researching for the past few months as there's so much in this area that intrigues me yet doesn't add up IMO. My preliminary findings (based on teachings from various schools and philosophies from as far back as before aniquity that recognise karma and the metaphysical laws) so far seem to be pointing to a few... uncomfortably dodgy facts. I hope it's just a case of a misunderstanding on my part or it's another part of the dark veil of evil that covers this earth to demoralise those who believe in God.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So was M15 purposefully suppressing information too? 

Peter-Morrison.jpg?w968

 

Margaret Thatcher personally supported one of her MP’s who had an alleged “penchant for small boys”, MI5 files disclosed to a public inquiry reveal.

An MI5 lawyer told the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) it was “a matter of regret” that the service considered only the national security implications of allegations of possible child abuse by Peter Morrison, Conservative MP for Chester, and did not pass information to the police.

 

The lawyer said MI5’s review of its files uncovered no evidence to indicate the existence of a Westminster paedophile network and nothing to suggest any attempt to cover up a child abuse ring in parliament.

 
 

But the witness, who gave evidence anonymously, admitted that memos and a letter from 1986 had discussed claims that Morrison had a “penchant for small boys”, and there was nothing to indicate MI5 passed the information in its possession to police.

 

The inquiry heard that two 1986 memos were written by Eliza Manningham-Buller, who went on to be the director general of MI5 between 2002 and 2007. 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/inquiry-child-sexual-abuse-peter-morrison-paedophile-tory-mp-thatcher-mi5-westminster-police-a8818151.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The British intelligence services were founded by a select Oxbridge elite who practiced a brand of Occultism that derived its teachings from a brand of black magic that specialised in child sex abuse and child sacrifice. It's no longer a great unfathomable mystery to me regarding what exactly these British sickos are doing behind closed doors. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use