Jump to content

Kashmir - who does it belong to?


Big_Tera
 Share

Recommended Posts

It's interesting what the Singh says at 5:33 

Either way these people are indigenous to the land and have every right to live in Kashmir.

Look at how sikhs were forced to leave everything behind in 1947 and migrate. Same thing is being done with these people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, chatanga1 said:

He didn't "decide" to. Maharaja Hari Singh was forced to, by circumstances/events out of his control. It was a case of "choosing between two evils" and he chose the lesser.

 

 

 

It's not as simple as that. Ever since the first "Pakistan" plan came out in 1928 Kashmir was to be a part of Pakistan. They always saw it as such. But 20 years later, the british gave the Princely states the option to join either india or pakistan. Maharaja Hari Singh delayed his choice in the hope that he could sit it out. But it backfired. The stupid pakistanis invaded and once he saw that his forces could not hold off the invading force he sent for help from india. Nehru only sent help once the "instrument of accession" had been signed.

 

The pakistanis were devasted by this as they had always seen it as a natural part of Pakistan with it being a overwhelming muslim majority. Reverse the dynamics and see if you can understand what they feel.

After the 1948 war over Kashmir, the UN intervened to bring an agreement between both countries. Pakistan was to withdraw its forces to 1947 borders, and India was to hold a plebiscite for the future of Kashmir. Nehru knew that India would lose Kashmir if he undertook this exercise and as such did anything he could to undermine the UN plan.

Even if there was such a plebiscite today , we all know what the outcome would be. India, as a country would be better off releasing their hold on Kashmir. Bullets and death only last for so long.

Have a read of this if you have time:

http://www.sikhawareness.com/topic/18477-five-villages-for-peace-and-prosperity/

Whether he was in a predicament or not  He chose at the end of the day fairly and squarely. It was his choice. Yes the situation may not have been easy. But we have to respect what the Maharaja wanted. After all it was his kingdom. 

If he would have chosen pakistan. Would you still be moaning and groaning? 

Ideally agreed he would have like to been independent. 

P.s 

Pakistan took more land that was rightfully theirs. Now they want more. They should be happy they got any land at all. After what their mughal ancestors did to India. 

Kashmir is and integral part of India. They should all bugger off back to the middle east where they came from. 

As that is their muslim homeland. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

For those short-sighted people  here

1. Kashmir jammu and ladakh  are all parts of the greater sikh lands so India haveno rights to claim them as an integral part of Hindia.

2. This bill was revoked without a vote which is illegal under the constitution

3. Centre will have direct control over the state , remember this is how they destroyed local poltical powerand voices

4. This also affects sikhs of those regions as we have already seen by the killing , rapes and illegal evictions by kashmiri pandits with army\police help

5. This is just a measure to set up the bloodbath and denial of citizenship of ordinary lawabiding muslims and sikhs

6.this sets an evil precedent which means we will see fascists throwing down all sorts of evil  laws at minorities to steal their livlihoods, homes and lands . They are already preparing to oust all sikhs from power positions in guruwara committee in India and abroad .

Good joke of a post. Where are the greater Sikhs land to which India can return Kashmir Jammu and Ladakh to?

Go back to school and find out that the Sikh lands were conquered way back by the pommies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, chatanga1 said:

The killing of innocent lives is mainly done by the indian army against kashmiris. False encounters. Like what they did in Panjab. By scrapping 370, it will only harden the resolve of Kashmiris to end indian rule there. When resolves harden, violence goes up.

This will not finally resolve the Kashmir issue. They have been fighting for 70 years. That HAS to tell us all something.

 

 

 

The biggest moral and military support to terrorists comes from Indian govt, supporting their forces there. Not only there but in north-east india, where the indian army carried out mass rapes to demoralise the rebels there. What does killing civilians help with? How does raping thousands of women help the indian govt and India?

 

 

 

 

They were not fighting for 70 years. They only started fighting when Pakistan started meddling in  there to revenge the making of Bangladesh.

Hope there is everlasting peace now.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

For those short-sighted people  here

1. Kashmir jammu and ladakh  are all parts of the greater sikh lands so India haveno rights to claim them as an integral part of Hindia.

2. This bill was revoked without a vote which is illegal under the constitution

3. Centre will have direct control over the state , remember this is how they destroyed local poltical powerand voices

4. This also affects sikhs of those regions as we have already seen by the killing , rapes and illegal evictions by kashmiri pandits with army\police help

5. This is just a measure to set up the bloodbath and denial of citizenship of ordinary lawabiding muslims and sikhs

6.this sets an evil precedent which means we will see fascists throwing down all sorts of evil  laws at minorities to steal their livlihoods, homes and lands . They are already preparing to oust all sikhs from power positions in guruwara committee in India and abroad .

Fantastic post!  The kind of thoughts that should automatically enter every Sikhs mind unless of course they have been infected by ‘Brahminsm’ (ie Mad Cow Disease)!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/5/2019 at 9:08 PM, JSinghnz said:

Great step taken by Modi to finally resolve the Kashmir issue by scrapping Article 370. Hope this brings peace to this area and ends the killing of so many innocent lives. Pakistan has to behave now and stop interfering and stop providing moral and military support to the terrorists.

Great step taken by Gurpatwant Singh Pannu to finally revive the Khalistan Independence issue by pushing forward the Punjab Referendum 2020 campaign. Hope this brings peace to this area and ends the killing of so many innocent Sikhs lives. India has to behave now and stop interfering and stop providing moral and military support to the Hindu terrorists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kashmir belongs to whomever the CIA and, to a certain extent, MI6 says it belongs to. Wrap your heads around the controversial idea that India and Pakistan have sold the lie of independence and autonomy to their respective populations (and the world), but are actually vassal states of whichever Western superpower claims them behind the scenes. The dog and pony show conducted in the media is for the purposes of selling the lie. The CIA will never allow India to go to war with Pakistan or vice versa. Aside from the typical brinkmanship and public war of words, nothing will come of the current situation. If anything, India will use the turmoil created by their recent decision by turning it to their advantage for political means by honing in on smaller regional issues under the cover of this larger conflict.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

Kashmir belongs to whomever the CIA and, to a certain extent, MI6 says it belongs to. Wrap your heads around the controversial idea that India and Pakistan have sold the lie of independence and autonomy to their respective populations (and the world), but are actually vassal states of whichever Western superpower claims them behind the scenes. The dog and pony show conducted in the media is for the purposes of selling the lie. The CIA will never allow India to go to war with Pakistan or vice versa. Aside from the typical brinkmanship and public war of words, nothing will come of the current situation. If anything, India will use the turmoil created by their recent decision by turning it to their advantage for political means by honing in on smaller regional issues under the cover of this larger conflict.

Shushma Swarj is dead, apparently she had a heart attack. i think a lot of politicians get murdered/killed off but in media they say its an "heart attack"    you really cant believe anything the media says, most the time the media presents what they want us to believe. most popular media houses are under the governments anyway.  BBC still says Diana "died" in an accident lol

we really dont know whats going on, thats the whole point of it, where not supposed to know, so they use media to mislead us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use