Jump to content

Kashmir - who does it belong to?


Big_Tera
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, GuestSingh said:

look my post was based on history. real life events, geopolitics n cold-truths. u can c the aforementioned oppression online for urself.

n my support is for gd sikhs bk home in panjab. so neither side here have my support given their history aganst sikhs. both have been n still r against sikhs. so whose side r u on? wats ur reason for pickin hindus over muslims?

as a hindu bahman, we expect u to favour these ppl. maybe even try to defend em, play dwn their atrocities n deflect any negative attention away from it. tht explains y ur post sounds exactly like wat a pro hindu nationalist wud say commenting on something like khalistan. uve either learnt well or ur one of em urself?

we knw wat happens to minorities on muslim land. its the same as minorities livin on hindu land. violence, oppression n murder in different ways. 

seein as both countries like to either rip their land apart or join it together by force, the earlier post tht suggested j&k be partitioned wiv each country claiming their majority populations region sounds like the solution.

'india' hasnt got much face to save anyway given their past. if the hindu elite couldnt defend themselves then they begged to their masters for benefits/jobs. like a little puppy on a leash for a treat. embarrassing.

This forum and countless forums are littered with Hindu RSS Agents.  They are infiltrating multiple Sikh platforms whether they be online or in the physical world.  Call them out challenge their lies with factual information.  If you encounter one in the real world, give them ‘Chittar Parade’ that will make their future generations chant ‘Khalistan Zindabad’ into the 22nd century.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Big_Tera said:

The army treats Kashmiris with respect. Yes they may be minor incidents of infringement here and there. But they only retaliate when they are attacked with stones and have to defend themselves.  Have you forgotton about palawama already? 

You sound like a wannabe muslim even though your nothing but an infidel to them. With your support for the suleh. 

If pakistan takes kashmir what will happen to non muslims there? You think they will be treated good?

Wake up and stop being a sulah a$$ licker. 

Did he say Pakistan should get Kashmir?  I missed it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chatanga1 said:

The conflict started in 1948 and has continued up to today. There has been three outright wars but continuing skirmishes in between. Then in 1984 there has been outright rebellion.

How can taking away the last pillar of support the Kashmeris had bring about  everlasting peace?

 

 

 

Because India's record of extrajudicial killings and rapes will be exposed to the world. At the moment they maintain it being an "internal matter" so they don't have to be exposed.

 

Also there is the very strong possibility that india will be deemed to denying the Kashmeris their right to self-determination which is upheld in the Basic Charter of Human Rights as enshrined in the UN.

 

I didn't read anything else after this line in your post. Next you will say that Aurangzeb treated Guru Tegh Bahahadur Ji with respect and Wazir Khan treated Sahibzadas with respect.

I can't believe that Sikhs have thinking like this at this time when the ease of information is at our fingertips.

 

 

 

I don't know why, but whenever you open your mouth it seems like you haven't engaged your brain. I mean, like, ALL the time. What is wrong with you?

These are not Sikhs lands. SIkhs took them in  battle and conquest like they took Peshawar and Khyber. Do you seriously count Peshawar and Khyber as greater Sikh lands?

Why are you spreading misonformation on this board?

OK my point is the area of the world these hinduvta busybodies want to claim as their birthright when

They never were born there

They did zero to defend these lands at anypoint in history

the only reason Ladakh and other areas which were acquired by Maharaja Ranjit Singh 's armies ended up as being part of India is through trechary and brownnosing of Dogrey , and Ladakh forms rhe majority of the land encircled by the state line, of course no mention of their land by name  and forget about protection of buddhists rights as those are being diminished and controlled by the army day by day much as in himachal.(Seen with own eyes on recent visit).

Anybody claiming army respecting sikhs nd muslims in these regions have not been paying attention to the news coming out of there. The army stationed there are raping females maiming boys, men and children with shot injuries, disappearences and encounters abound , they are living through their genocide years.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AGAIN!  Again you show your ignorance! It's like you do no reading, no research but have to have an opinion on everything. 

General Zorawar Singh who captured Ladakh for the Sikh kingdom was a hindu. The force that captured it was Dogra. 

It was even rumoured that the Sikh governor of Kashmir unhappy at Zorawars conquests tried to set him up in a trap in Ladakh hut Zorawar was too astute. 

Can you please stop just adding false information on this board?

I hope you are not like this with your family. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, chatanga1 said:

AGAIN!  Again you show your ignorance! It's like you do no reading, no research but have to have an opinion on everything. 

General Zorawar Singh who captured Ladakh for the Sikh kingdom was a hindu. The force that captured it was Dogra. 

It was even rumoured that the Sikh governor of Kashmir unhappy at Zorawars conquests tried to set him up in a trap in Ladakh hut Zorawar was too astute. 

Can you please stop just adding false information on this board?

I hope you are not like this with your family. 

That occured after angrez smart alec, under raja Gulab singh dogra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/9/2019 at 4:13 AM, chatanga1 said:

The conflict started in 1948 and has continued up to today. There has been three outright wars but continuing skirmishes in between. Then in 1984 there has been outright rebellion.

How can taking away the last pillar of support the Kashmeris had bring about  everlasting peace?

 

 

 

Because India's record of extrajudicial killings and rapes will be exposed to the world. At the moment they maintain it being an "internal matter" so they don't have to be exposed.

 

Also there is the very strong possibility that india will be deemed to denying the Kashmeris their right to self-determination which is upheld in the Basic Charter of Human Rights as enshrined in the UN.

 

I didn't read anything else after this line in your post. Next you will say that Aurangzeb treated Guru Tegh Bahahadur Ji with respect and Wazir Khan treated Sahibzadas with respect.

I can't believe that Sikhs have thinking like this at this time when the ease of information is at our fingertips.

 

 

 

I don't know why, but whenever you open your mouth it seems like you haven't engaged your brain. I mean, like, ALL the time. What is wrong with you?

These are not Sikhs lands. SIkhs took them in  battle and conquest like they took Peshawar and Khyber. Do you seriously count Peshawar and Khyber as greater Sikh lands?

Why are you spreading misonformation on this board?

Pakistan has been waging a proxy war against India in Kashmir as it has no chance of victory by waging a conventional war.

Even during the Kargil conflict Pakistan lied about freedom fighters having entered Indian side of LOC. Later on Pakistan had to publicly admit it is a terrorist state when it was proven that it was their army which had infiltrated the borders.

The humiliating defeat Pakistan suffered is something they can never forget.

Our bravehearts gave the ultimate sacrifice to win this war and all previous wars against Pakistan.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is India can easily win any war with pakistan. 

But they cant defend against suicide bombs and terrorists. 

Pakistan have a atrocious record of supporting terrorist. 

Look at the Taj bombings in mumbai. 

India should all unite against this scum people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use