Jump to content

Kashmir - who does it belong to?


Big_Tera
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Big_Tera said:

If Hari Singh the princely ruler decided he wanted his kingdom to be part of India. 

Why should Pakistan claim it? As it was ceded to India in a proper and just way. 

 

Great step taken by Modi to finally resolve the Kashmir issue by scrapping Article 370. Hope this brings peace to this area and ends the killing of so many innocent lives. Pakistan has to behave now and stop interfering and stop providing moral and military support to the terrorists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, JSinghnz said:

Great step taken by Modi to finally resolve the Kashmir issue by scrapping Article 370. Hope this brings peace to this area and ends the killing of so many innocent lives. Pakistan has to behave now and stop interfering and stop providing moral and military support to the terrorists.

Its funny and highly ironic that some foolish apne support the terrorists. While Sikhs and Hindus are suffering due to the insurgency. 

Agreed on the article 370. This will hopefully allow more non muslims to move to Kashmir and buy up land ect.

As presently no one from outside kashmir can move there and buy property. Hope The kashmiri pandits can move back to their rightful home and land.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Big_Tera said:

If Hari Singh the princely ruler decided he wanted his kingdom to be part of India.

He didn't "decide" to. Maharaja Hari Singh was forced to, by circumstances/events out of his control. It was a case of "choosing between two evils" and he chose the lesser.

 

 

21 hours ago, Big_Tera said:

Why should Pakistan claim it? As it was ceded to India in a proper and just way.

 

It's not as simple as that. Ever since the first "Pakistan" plan came out in 1928 Kashmir was to be a part of Pakistan. They always saw it as such. But 20 years later, the british gave the Princely states the option to join either india or pakistan. Maharaja Hari Singh delayed his choice in the hope that he could sit it out. But it backfired. The stupid pakistanis invaded and once he saw that his forces could not hold off the invading force he sent for help from india. Nehru only sent help once the "instrument of accession" had been signed.

 

The pakistanis were devasted by this as they had always seen it as a natural part of Pakistan with it being a overwhelming muslim majority. Reverse the dynamics and see if you can understand what they feel.

After the 1948 war over Kashmir, the UN intervened to bring an agreement between both countries. Pakistan was to withdraw its forces to 1947 borders, and India was to hold a plebiscite for the future of Kashmir. Nehru knew that India would lose Kashmir if he undertook this exercise and as such did anything he could to undermine the UN plan.

Even if there was such a plebiscite today , we all know what the outcome would be. India, as a country would be better off releasing their hold on Kashmir. Bullets and death only last for so long.

Have a read of this if you have time:

http://www.sikhawareness.com/topic/18477-five-villages-for-peace-and-prosperity/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, JSinghnz said:

Great step taken by Modi to finally resolve the Kashmir issue by scrapping Article 370. Hope this brings peace to this area and ends the killing of so many innocent lives.

The killing of innocent lives is mainly done by the indian army against kashmiris. False encounters. Like what they did in Panjab. By scrapping 370, it will only harden the resolve of Kashmiris to end indian rule there. When resolves harden, violence goes up.

This will not finally resolve the Kashmir issue. They have been fighting for 70 years. That HAS to tell us all something.

 

 

14 hours ago, JSinghnz said:

Pakistan has to behave now and stop interfering and stop providing moral and military support to the terrorists.

 

The biggest moral and military support to terrorists comes from Indian govt, supporting their forces there. Not only there but in north-east india, where the indian army carried out mass rapes to demoralise the rebels there. What does killing civilians help with? How does raping thousands of women help the indian govt and India?

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a bad move by India and it will only cause more trouble. Extra army officers have been deployed in Kashmir with a complete block on communication for Kashmir so the outside world has no idea what happening in Kashmir. Does not sound right at all. With Modi in charge India is turning into another North Korea 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From an Indian perspective,  it is a master stroke.

Their goal is to keep india intact.

By removing article 370, they can turn the state into a non-Muslim majority. 

Also note that Indian controlled Kashmir is three parts (Ladakh- mostly buddhist), Jammu - mostly Hindu and the Kashmir valley.

I think the Jammu and Ladakh people's are probably fed up of those valley folk hogging up all the benefits and political power and might be grateful for this.

If there is going to be insurgency (which is propped up by Pakistan) , it will be a short term hit for long term gain.

It's not as if Pakistan Occupied Kashmir hasn't been swamped with non locals eg in Gilgit and Baltistan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kashmir is a liability for India. Kashmir valley itself is a small part of the entire j&k state. Almost all the Kashmiri Muslims are concentrated there.  India would be better off separating Jammu from Kashmir and give Kashmir valley to Pakistan and keep Hindu Jammu and Buddhist Ladakh for it self.

 

https://images.app.goo.gl/2bQZXGzWiZnhe7E18

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those short-sighted people  here

1. Kashmir jammu and ladakh  are all parts of the greater sikh lands so India haveno rights to claim them as an integral part of Hindia.

2. This bill was revoked without a vote which is illegal under the constitution

3. Centre will have direct control over the state , remember this is how they destroyed local poltical powerand voices

4. This also affects sikhs of those regions as we have already seen by the killing , rapes and illegal evictions by kashmiri pandits with army\police help

5. This is just a measure to set up the bloodbath and denial of citizenship of ordinary lawabiding muslims and sikhs

6.this sets an evil precedent which means we will see fascists throwing down all sorts of evil  laws at minorities to steal their livlihoods, homes and lands . They are already preparing to oust all sikhs from power positions in guruwara committee in India and abroad .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What percentage of people from that region are sikhs?  I think around 2% probably? 

A lot of the sikhs and Hindus living in jammu are actual ethnic kashmiris from the valley.  People from jammu are not actual kashmiris. people from jammu are mainly dogras I think 

Most sikhs from that region are kashmiris from the valley but now live in jammu.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use