Jump to content

How 1% population exploits 99% population


shastarSingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

marxism is responsible for deaths of 100 of millions on this planet it is just a system to set up the world for elites to rule over . Ever read the history of the russian and chinese revolutions ?

you can see the more equal than some in both countries, all systems capitalism, marxism  and comunism are utterly flawed and destructive . Anarchism of Guru Sahiban is the true solution where we take only what is needed , after we have earnt it and sharing our resources with others so all are cared for, answering to no master class or false authority . The environment and animals are protected and cared for and peace and diplomacy is the main approach not imperialistic empire building.

athenian democracy relied on slavery to generating income so also not what we want .

Thanks for the reply. I'm here to learn.

From what little I have read about Marxism I found it good. To say that marxism was responsible for  killing of millions in Soviet union  is equivalent to saying christianity was responsible for killing of jews during world wars. There is difference between Marxism and communism of Stalin and Maoism of China.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

marxism is responsible for deaths of 100 of millions on this planet it is just a system to set up the world for elites to rule over . Ever read the history of the russian and chinese revolutions ?

you can see the more equal than some in both countries, all systems capitalism, marxism  and comunism are utterly flawed and destructive . Anarchism of Guru Sahiban is the true solution where we take only what is needed , after we have earnt it and sharing our resources with others so all are cared for, answering to no master class or false authority . The environment and animals are protected and cared for and peace and diplomacy is the main approach not imperialistic empire building.

athenian democracy relied on slavery to generating income so also not what we want .

Jkvlondon

plz watch the below video. Marxism is different from the 20th century communism in Russia and China. Karl Marx was only concerned about the work place and was not too concerned about the politics of who owns the workplace (govt. Or private people ). He wanted democracy in the work place where every worker has a say in the decision making and not just few people at the top.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/5/2019 at 9:09 AM, Not2Cool2Argue said:

What about social democracy like that practiced in Scandinavian countries (Norway, Sweden) etc 

Communism failed because government got too powerful and misused it's power.

In social democracy rich business men will become very powerful and there is always a risk that they will misuse their power to halt the social welfare programs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

simply put any time you put a small group in charge of the resources of the majority there will be corruption . Guru ji's system of local singhs and Kaurs tending to local needs and organising and cooperating with other neighouring jathey worked well to support the Singhs during hard times as well as more prosperous times .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jkvlondon said:

simply put any time you put a small group in charge of the resources of the majority there will be corruption . Guru ji's system of local singhs and Kaurs tending to local needs and organising and cooperating with other neighouring jathey worked well to support the Singhs during hard times as well as more prosperous times .

No doubt Guru jee is perfect and His system will be perfect too. But I need some help in understanding Guru jee's system.

During Guru jee's time there were some rich Sikhs like Makhan Shah lubana and todar mall. Does it mean system will be capitalistic? 

Plz explain Guru jee's system in simple words.

Thanks 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/5/2019 at 6:26 AM, shastarSingh said:

Thanks for the reply. I'm here to learn.

From what little I have read about Marxism I found it good. To say that marxism was responsible for  killing of millions in Soviet union  is equivalent to saying christianity was responsible for killing of jews during world wars. There is difference between Marxism and communism of Stalin and Maoism of China.

Christianity has killed more people than anything else as far as I can tell. I'm sure Yahawshai is super stoked on that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Christianity has killed more people than anything else as far as I can tell. I'm sure Yahawshai is super stoked on that. 

U r right. I am not trying to protect christianity. All I am saying is that christianity was not responsible for the killing of jews by Nazi Christians.

Same way Marxism was not responsible for what Stalin did. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use