Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Premi5

Lord Indarjit Singh

Recommended Posts

Today programme presenter has expressed his regret over Sikh peer’s decision to quit Thought For The Day over 'thought police' row. 

Lord Singh announced he was quitting Thought for the Day after 35 years to protest the BBC trying to prevent him from broadcasting an item commemorating an executed Sikh Guru for fear that it “might offend Muslims".

The script, which was broadcast last November, did not criticise Islam and did not recieve any complaints for discussing the Sikh guru, who had spoken out about Hindus being forced to convert to Islam under the 17th century Mughal emperors of India.

Speaking on the Today programme on BBC Radio 4 yesterday morning, presenter Justin Webb called the news of Indarjit Singh’s departure “rather sad”. 

Indarjit Singh has accused the BBC of “prejudice and intolerance”.  

"It was like saying to a christian that he or she should not talk about Easter for fear of giving offence to the Jews," he told the Times. 

Lord Singh made an official complaint about the incident, saying it was not the first time he had been prevented from discussing subjects important to Sikhs. 

James Purnell, the corporation's director of radio, ordered a review, which rejected the complaint. 

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/10/04/today-presenter-expresses-regret-sikh-peers-decision-quit-thought/]

 

Good for him to speak out!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Says it all.

If SIkhs mention the truth about their history, establishment honkies get upset. 

And these are the id10ts so many Sikhs fought for in the past......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the west is using muslims as pawns    im not sure what the agenda is but whatever it is muslims are falling for it    Sikhs arent the only ones that have been told to keep quite   christians, atheists etc  all have        Its interesting because the media is making the muslims villains and victims at the same time      jews are another community which you cant offend   

 

look at this 

Image result for hillary obama easter worshippers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, puzzled said:

I think the west is using muslims as pawns    im not sure what the agenda is but whatever it is muslims are falling for it    Sikhs arent the only ones that have been told to keep quite   christians, atheists etc  all have        Its interesting because the media is making the muslims villains and victims at the same time      jews are another community which you cant offend   

 

look at this 

Image result for hillary obama easter worshippers

The goal is to destroy Christianity in the west.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

The goal is to destroy Christianity in the west.

 

And goray here in the UK want to destroy Sikhi too, and put an anglicised hor5eshyte version in its place, one that subtly and deviously encourages sycophancy from our lot towards them.  They've been at it for a long while now. 

Christianity is dead in england, and has been for a long while. The focus is on us now, especially since apnay have objected to the culture of just quietly condoning pedophilia and grooming, as is a norm in english culture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

And goray here in the UK want to destroy Sikhi too, and put an anglicised hor5eshyte version in its place, one that subtly and deviously encourages sycophancy from our lot towards them.  They've been at it for a long while now. 

Christianity is dead in england, and has been for a long while. The focus is on us now, especially since apnay have objected to the culture of just quietly condoning pedophilia and grooming, as is a norm in english culture.

Which goreh would they be?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Ranjeet01 said:

Which goreh would they be?

The establishment ones. 

These guys telling Lard Indarjit to shut up about Sikh history is just one part of the attack. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think their tryna destroy religion in the west   different religions are being destroyed differently   Christianity with liberalism and Islam with extremism     i dont think sikhi or sikhs are seen as a threat though tbh   or hindus      

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, puzzled said:

I think their tryna destroy religion in the west   different religions are being destroyed differently   Christianity with liberalism and Islam with extremism     i dont think sikhi or sikhs are seen as a threat though tbh   or hindus      

Sikhs are definitely seen as a threat in the UK. Maybe not the inactive, puppoo, office boy types - but other active ones are. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

The goal is to destroy Christianity in the west.

its happening   but why do you think they tryna do that?   i think their tryna destroy islam as well but with a different approach    i think their destroying islam with extremism,  radical islam and extremism is gnna be the beginning of the end of islam   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

The establishment ones. 

These guys telling Lard Indarjit to shut up about Sikh history is just one part of the attack. 

It seems that Christianity as a political tool has served it's purpose. 

The long game with Islam I don't quite understand. 

The BBC seems to have a particular agenda. It seems to be very "progressive", very pro-gay and pro-feminist and anti-male.  If anything they are quite authoritarian in their approach pushing for this agenda rather than being "liberal" as they claim to be.

I find this quite contradictory to the pro-Islamic tint they have.

However, there does seem to be a hierarchy of preference that the likes of the BBC have. Islam and muslims in general are ranked far higher than we Sikhs are.

However their "progressive" agenda is higher than their liking for muslims and Islam.

Even though they prefer muslims over Sikhs, they love gays and feminists more. Though they will not go directly against islam, they think that they can infiltrate their "progressivism" into muslims.

If you notice the protests with the muslim school in Birmingham against the teaching of lgbt stuff, the BBC and the likes of other "progressive " publications like the Guardian supported their "progressive" values over their love of muslims.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

Sikhs are definitely seen as a threat in the UK. Maybe not the inactive, puppoo, office boy types - but other active ones are. 

maybe when some sikhs are loud and vocal about things like grooming    because the authorities knew about white girls being groomed for a long time but they ignored it and kept quite   the government obviously knew  but they didnt want to do anything about it.     but in general  i really dont think they see sikhs as a threat.   a lot of sikhs (not all)  like you said now have become gorrafied office boys      

becoming westernized and gorrafied is the quickest way to destroy indian religions i think   iv seen it a lot in hindu families and some sikh    first ones to dump sikhi would be the gorrafied ones   

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, puzzled said:

maybe when some sikhs are loud and vocal about things like grooming    because the authorities knew about white girls being groomed for a long time but they ignored it and kept quite   the government obviously knew  but they didnt want to do anything about it.     but in general  i really dont think they see sikhs as a threat.   a lot of sikhs (not all)  like you said now have become gorrafied office boys       

I think they are scared that the active ones will wake up some of the docile ones. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, puzzled said:

its happening   but why do you think they tryna do that?   i think their tryna destroy islam as well but with a different approach    i think their destroying islam with extremism,  radical islam and extremism is gnna be the beginning of the end of islam   

If they wanted to destroy Islam, why bring them into Europe in the first place?

They should have emancipated the women in the Islamic countries to bring the birth rates down so their populations go down.

I think there is one community that has problems with both the Religion of Love and the Religion of Peace that has an interest in getting them to wipe each other.

I wonder who that can be?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What you folk need to understand about the intentions and desired affect behind the broader, "There is no Hindu, there is no Muslim" narrative pushed by certain contemporary ideologues is that by embracing and pushing this belief, it also endorses -- by omission -- the idea that there is also no Sikh. It is a sentiment of erasure; our erasure. The original sentiment espoused by Guru Sahib was a unifying idea  steeped in an admirable sense of spirituality whereby they wanted to promote the idea that our differences are superficial, and ultimately we are more than the labels that we cling to. This was  during a period where Hindus and Muslims were numbered in the millions. For someone to come along at the time and propose a so-called third way in the midst of social and religious strife, was a radical act, because at the time the adherents to that third way numbered a handful of individuals with no real presence. Some might argue, therefore, that Guru Sahib never planned for us to become the very thing they were rallying against, which I don't believe is true, because it would mean subsequent Guru Sahibs were spinning the wheels of rebellion and organisation without an end goal in mind, which I believe is false. Now that we've grown beyond that relatively short number YET are still nowhere near the billions of the other two factions, for us to promote and celebrate this "One Religion" idea in the modern world -- especially after everything we've seen and experienced in the subsequent centuries -- is damaging to our survival as a distinct group. You can either choose to belong to the human race and pretend as if differences and divisions don't exist, or you exist with some form of preference and affection for the unique cultural and religious heritage of your ancestors. Celebrating the distinctness of others while simultaneously undermining your own uniqueness and doctrine is what traitors do. And a group comprised of traitors -- whether they be well-meaning yet misguided or of the calculating variety -- is a group that is destined for destruction.
    • Guest Zee Kay
      Bad deeds have bad results or bad people meet bad end. 
    • Why I am not allowed to talk about black folk? I hope you are not trying to censor me. You do come from a country where the 1st amendment is all important.  Nothing I said was hate speech.  You seem to have a tyrannical authoritarian streak in you.
    • Because the color of the Akali bana given by Guru Gobind Singh ji is blue. When the SGPC came and removed the Shromani Akali Panth Budhha Dal from the Akal Takhat, it called itself "Akali Dal", and retained elements of the Akali maryada in order to call themselves "Akalis".
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use