Jump to content

Lord Indarjit Singh


Premi5
 Share

Recommended Posts

Today programme presenter has expressed his regret over Sikh peer’s decision to quit Thought For The Day over 'thought police' row. 

Lord Singh announced he was quitting Thought for the Day after 35 years to protest the BBC trying to prevent him from broadcasting an item commemorating an executed Sikh Guru for fear that it “might offend Muslims".

The script, which was broadcast last November, did not criticise Islam and did not recieve any complaints for discussing the Sikh guru, who had spoken out about Hindus being forced to convert to Islam under the 17th century Mughal emperors of India.

Speaking on the Today programme on BBC Radio 4 yesterday morning, presenter Justin Webb called the news of Indarjit Singh’s departure “rather sad”. 

Indarjit Singh has accused the BBC of “prejudice and intolerance”.  

"It was like saying to a christian that he or she should not talk about Easter for fear of giving offence to the Jews," he told the Times. 

Lord Singh made an official complaint about the incident, saying it was not the first time he had been prevented from discussing subjects important to Sikhs. 

James Purnell, the corporation's director of radio, ordered a review, which rejected the complaint. 

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/10/04/today-presenter-expresses-regret-sikh-peers-decision-quit-thought/]

 

Good for him to speak out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the west is using muslims as pawns    im not sure what the agenda is but whatever it is muslims are falling for it    Sikhs arent the only ones that have been told to keep quite   christians, atheists etc  all have        Its interesting because the media is making the muslims villains and victims at the same time      jews are another community which you cant offend   

 

look at this 

Image result for hillary obama easter worshippers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, puzzled said:

I think the west is using muslims as pawns    im not sure what the agenda is but whatever it is muslims are falling for it    Sikhs arent the only ones that have been told to keep quite   christians, atheists etc  all have        Its interesting because the media is making the muslims villains and victims at the same time      jews are another community which you cant offend   

 

look at this 

Image result for hillary obama easter worshippers

The goal is to destroy Christianity in the west.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

The goal is to destroy Christianity in the west.

 

And goray here in the UK want to destroy Sikhi too, and put an anglicised hor5eshyte version in its place, one that subtly and deviously encourages sycophancy from our lot towards them.  They've been at it for a long while now. 

Christianity is dead in england, and has been for a long while. The focus is on us now, especially since apnay have objected to the culture of just quietly condoning pedophilia and grooming, as is a norm in english culture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

And goray here in the UK want to destroy Sikhi too, and put an anglicised hor5eshyte version in its place, one that subtly and deviously encourages sycophancy from our lot towards them.  They've been at it for a long while now. 

Christianity is dead in england, and has been for a long while. The focus is on us now, especially since apnay have objected to the culture of just quietly condoning pedophilia and grooming, as is a norm in english culture.

Which goreh would they be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, puzzled said:

I think their tryna destroy religion in the west   different religions are being destroyed differently   Christianity with liberalism and Islam with extremism     i dont think sikhi or sikhs are seen as a threat though tbh   or hindus      

Sikhs are definitely seen as a threat in the UK. Maybe not the inactive, puppoo, office boy types - but other active ones are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use