Jump to content

Jatts were not pioneer of sikhs in BC rajputs were


Guest Harjeet
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, ipledgeblue said:

yes, but even being unmarried in late 20s makes for vikaari people, nevermind 30s. 30s some people go really downhill

Definitely. At the most, get your bachelor's degree. And get married. 

If, for whatever reason, you want to get a postgrad degree, get it after being married. Plenty of people do. 

Not being able to find a partner is no excuse. Start a few years before graduation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BhForce said:

Definitely. At the most, get your bachelor's degree. And get married. 

If, for whatever reason, you want to get a postgrad degree, get it after being married. Plenty of people do. 

Not being able to find a partner is no excuse. Start a few years before graduation.

 

to be honest, our community should start looking for potential partners for their children, when the children are studying undergrad.

Although, to be honest, many children will already have started doing something which is anti-grihast before they even reach uni. It would be more optimal if the community started looking in the teens for a potential early 20s marriage. 

In the villages, I hear the youngsters were married off early but they couldn't meet their partner until they reached their late teens, where the wife was brought over to her husband's house as a muklawa. So it was like finding a potential partner early except the marriage ritual/ceremony such as laavan / Anand Karaj was already done beforehand! And when you're in your teens or early 20s you can grow with you partner, instead of becoming fussy with demands which is what happens when you grow too old looking for a partner!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/29/2019 at 5:46 AM, LifeIsBeautiful said:

Honestly, not sure what your event talking about, rajputs are a minoeity, I'm talking less than 5 percent in BC if we want to get caste based. Honestly I think mayo Singh was ramghariyaa anyways so not sure what your talking about. I worked with his grandson in Victoria.

 

 

His last name was minhas that's a rajput last name not a ramghariah 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Harditsingh said:

His last name was minhas that's a rajput last name not a ramghariah 

Honestly if I didn't know, I don't think anyone in my generation gives a <banned word filter activated> either. Your probably in your 20s, so I'll let you in a little secret. Life is such a short ride, people don't really care what caste mayo was, he did something.

 

Dissing jatts or anyone and saying their this that, won't help you succeed either. Not sure why the admins allow a post to diss jatts so easily. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most people who call themselves Rajputs are Jatts. Jatt is a kaum. Jatts can be Rajputs only if their parents or grand parents were rulers of some land. Again it was a temporary title. But some people like to feed their ego and carried/carrying on with such titles even generations after generations.

And regarding Sikh, it means learner/seeker the word is derived from Sanskrith language.

Moreover, nobody is a born Sikh. One becomes a Sikh by following the teachings of a Guru. So there could be different type of Sikhs in this world since they could be following different teachings.

Now think about some Christians, Muslims, Budhists, and Jains. Are they following the teachings of their Gurus? If yes then they are Sikhs of their Gurus. So Sikhs have been around on this planet for a long time. So it is very hard to decide who became the first Sikh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use