Jump to content

Triple stabbing in East London


MrDoaba
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

One of them was Hindu.

It was a fight between builders who were not paid.

The BBC is pro-muslim.

Well, it seems the Daily Mail did a little better than the Cumbria Mail in that they only spoke of 3 Sikh victims, and not perpetrators.

Oops, I guess I spoke too soon because it looks like the initial headline in the Daily Mail referenced "Sikh gangs": "3 killed in Sikh gang bloodbath"

That makes it look like Sikhs do nothing but roam around all day looking for people to kill. 

Thankfully the Mail wised up and changed the headline to " Three Sikh men found stabbed to death in street were 'builders rowing with bosses over not being paid' ".

This is accurate, but much damage was already done. 

Kudos to the Sikh Press Association. They should follow up with an article about the Daily Mail reporters Vivek Chaudhary and Joe Middleton, including photos, family background, where they went to school, whether they or any family/friends have ever been in any kind of trouble. And the same for their editors.

Also report on their religions, and any violence done by members of those religions (Hindu and Christian).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very Sad news , deepest condolences to their families may their souls rest in peace .

I think we need a national / international database registering all amritdhari baptized Sikhs , detailing , when they took Amrit , there address when baptized etc... , and issue each with ID cards. So that sikhi is not targeted , hope i'm very wrong but the way kaljug is spreading in this world , whats stopping a dushman of sikhi , dressing up as a baptized sikh and misusing the articles of faith , especially the kirpan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, DSG said:

I think we need a national / international database registering all amritdhari baptized Sikhs , detailing , when they took Amrit , there address when baptized etc... , and issue each with ID cards. So that sikhi is not targeted , hope i'm very wrong but the way kaljug is spreading in this world , whats stopping a dushman of sikhi , dressing up as a baptized sikh and misusing the articles of faith , especially the kirpan.

No one said it was an amritdhari Sikh who used his kirpan to do this, bro.

In fact, it hasn't even come out that the attackers were Sikhs (though 2 of the victims were).

Even if the attackers were Sikhs, I doubt that they used kirpans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

No one said it was an amritdhari Sikh who used his kirpan to do this, bro.

In fact, it hasn't even come out that the attackers were Sikhs (though 2 of the victims were).

Even if the attackers were Sikhs, I doubt that they used kirpans.

LOL , sorry bad timing for the post bro , slightly off topic .. I agree with your comments , was just ranting on about how we can protect amrtidhari and sikhi as if someone dressed up in bana , has kesh , kirpan and commits crimes ( just some thoughts ..thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, BhForce said:

No one said it was an amritdhari Sikh who used his kirpan to do this, bro.

In fact, it hasn't even come out that the attackers were Sikhs (though 2 of the victims were).

Even if the attackers were Sikhs, I doubt that they used kirpans.

there was mention of blunt force injuries from hammer, knife wounds from eyewitnesses who tried to help the victims

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jkvlondon said:

there was mention of blunt force injuries from hammer, knife wounds from eyewitnesses who tried to help the victims

And that's fine. It's just that in the early stages of a story, there's a lot of misinformation going around. 

Even if it's established that there were knife wounds, that in no way means it was Amritdhari Sikhs who did it.

Since it's said that it was a construction industry dispute, "hammer injuries" makes me think that those people were using their construction tools (hammer and cutting knives).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BhForce said:

And that's fine. It's just that in the early stages of a story, there's a lot of misinformation going around. 

Even if it's established that there were knife wounds, that in no way means it was Amritdhari Sikhs who did it.

Since it's said that it was a construction industry dispute, "hammer injuries" makes me think that those people were using their construction tools (hammer and cutting knives).

we all know Murdoch and the tories are kowtowing to RSS demands to put down the sikhs much like Maggie during the eighties . This is all hinting/implying that knife crime is a reason to disarm the sikhs . It burns RSS up that sikhs have freedom in the disaspora to exercise their full sikh rights and faith(and it is our foolish people who throw that away for fashion, kicks, social ease). Priti Patel is a RSS stooge as are many MPs embedded in plitics from Indian background.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

we all know Murdoch and the tories are kowtowing to RSS demands to put down the sikhs much like Maggie during the eighties . This is all hinting/implying that knife crime is a reason to disarm the sikhs . It burns RSS up that sikhs have freedom in the disaspora to exercise their full sikh rights and faith(and it is our foolish people who throw that away for fashion, kicks, social ease). Priti Patel is a RSS stooge as are many MPs embedded in plitics from Indian background.

Murdoch, Conservatives, and the like, is a very limited and outdated way of processing this issue. It runs deeper than these cursory ideological labels that are meaningless to anyone but those who still believe the world functions according to the Left and Right / Liberal and Conservative paradigm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use