Jump to content

Laurence Fox claimed Sikh soldier in Sam Mendes war epic 1917 is ‘forcing diversity’


genie
 Share

Recommended Posts

I agreed with this fox guy when he appeared on question time cos not everything these crazy far left feminists or muslim activists say is classed as "white male privilege".

but now he has shown his true White male privilege and far right white racist views when he complained about a sikh soldier being featured in the new movie 1917 as "forced diversity" in the movie industry. Had he had a brain or some intelligence he would have realised 83,000+ turbanned sikh soldiers died fighting shoulder to shoulder with allied forces in both world wars defending the UK in foreign lands they had no personal conflict with. It shows these white racists are  trying to go mainstream these days aided by stupid views of far left crazypot idiots causing people to become more tolerant to the alternative opposite views.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was interesting how he had a go at Sam Mendes film 1917 but forgot the much older film 'the English Patient' with the SIngh in it too , obviously they do not teach about the 1.5 million Indian men who came into the first World War arena on promise of independence, in such schools as Harrow and Eton . Even Churchill admitted that the UK had let down the Indians despite their sacrifice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just think about it:

This Fox fudhu saw a single brown turbaned man in film about WW1, and it was enough to cause him mental torment at having to think about being white - a trauma so intense, that he felt compelled to go on TV and air his imagined 'injustice' at having been subjected to such an horrendous experience at the altar of 'multiculturalism' and 'forced diversity'.  

What a spoilt, closeted fudhu. If something like this is enough to cause you so much distress - you REALLY must have a lovely life.

c**t.

And to think that these are the kinds of privileged, ignorant whiteys that are put into positions of power...........  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dallysingh101 said:

Just think about it:

This Fox fudhu saw a single brown turbaned man in film about WW1, and it was enough to cause him mental torment at having to think about being white - a trauma so intense, that he felt compelled to go on TV and air his imagined 'injustice' at having been subjected to such an horrendous experience at the altar of 'multiculturalism' and 'forced diversity'.  

What a spoilt, closeted fudhu. If something like this is enough to cause you so much distress - you REALLY must have a lovely life.

c**t.

And to think that these are the kinds of privileged, ignorant whiteys that are put into positions of power...........  

obviously never saw 'The English Patient' , always disliked his father James Fox played toffeenosed english toffs in films , Larry was married to Billie Piper  ex-TARDIS girl and had messy expensive custody battle but had to whine on in the newspapers too. Guess he's just one of those twerps who cannot do good anywhere but whines about his victimisationin all spheres of life . Tiresome

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Indians fought in these wars simply for the money, I really dont think they cared about the cause   let's be realistic here!  Same with all the people from other colonised countries that fought in the war. 

More muslims fought in these wars than Sikhs even though its strictly against their religion to fight for non muslims or for a non muslim cause.   They simply did it for the money. 

If anything it opened doors for people to move to the uk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use