Jump to content

Do all paths that jap naam lead you back to akaal Purakh?


1Anonymous1
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Akalifauj said:

What are they experiencing?  Sounds? Seeing the future? Obtaining what they desire?  If they were experiencing something spiritual as Gurmat describes they would fall at the feet of Punj Pyare and take amrit.  

 

Satbachan, after speaking to them I know they were just going through dharam khand as they described as they were walking on their path they could hear screams of people in hell. As per what they hear or see he wouldn’t tell me more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/30/2020 at 2:52 AM, puzzled said:

Other examples of hindus that bhai gurdas ji gives in his vaarns.

Bhagat dhru was given naam by nard muni. Bhagat dru then rejected his fathers kingdom

 

On 2/2/2020 at 5:39 AM, Akalifauj said:

The Gurbani you have quoted does not say only in kalyug.  That is your own belief.  Naam simran is not about some chanting one word.  Vaheguru and the word Raam are no lesser or greater from each other

You guys both believe the same thing. But are describing it differently and talking past each other. 

By sikhi, Akalifauj does not mean being amritdhari or folowing the religion sikhism. He means the truth. 

Like all the bhagats, they were born in hindu families but rejected most of what their religion and society taught. Instead they focused on the universal truth. And because it was universal truth, their bani is included in guru granth sahib ji. Same with the sufi fakirs like bhagat farid ji. They were born muslims but rejected some aspects of islam. And embraced universal truth. And because they believed in truth their bani aligned with sikhi which is also truth.

And Satguru is needed to give naam. But satguru is an aspect of God. It has existed since the world was created. And was manifest as Guru Nanak dev ji. But before 1469, Satguru or sargunn saroop of waheguru appeared to certain ppl and gave them naam. After 1469, that sargunn saroop of waheguru is manofest in sri guru granth sahib ji. I dont think i am describing this right. But bhai randheer singhs book due a good job of describing sikh philosophy. Not jail chittyian that is just an autobiography. He wrote many pamphlets and books. One of my favorite is Is bowing down to Guru Granth Sahib ji idol worship.

Anyways. What you guys are both saying is Ganika was not in hindu because she didnt follow strictly hindiu teachings. But she was saved due to japping naam. Which is a sikhi concept so she was a sikh. 

Some ppl argue that only the name waheguru can save you. But really meditation is meditation. And no one word can limit waheguru or his mercy. This was given by our guru so we should honor it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Not2Cool2Argue said:

 

You guys both believe the same thing. But are describing it differently and talking past each other. 

By sikhi, Akalifauj does not mean being amritdhari or folowing the religion sikhism. He means the truth. 

Like all the bhagats, they were born in hindu families but rejected most of what their religion and society taught. Instead they focused on the universal truth. And because it was universal truth, their bani is included in guru granth sahib ji. Same with the sufi fakirs like bhagat farid ji. They were born muslims but rejected some aspects of islam. And embraced universal truth. And because they believed in truth their bani aligned with sikhi which is also truth.

And Satguru is needed to give naam. But satguru is an aspect of God. It has existed since the world was created. And was manifest as Guru Nanak dev ji. But before 1469, Satguru or sargunn saroop of waheguru appeared to certain ppl and gave them naam. After 1469, that sargunn saroop of waheguru is manofest in sri guru granth sahib ji. I dont think i am describing this right. But bhai randheer singhs book due a good job of describing sikh philosophy. Not jail chittyian that is just an autobiography. He wrote many pamphlets and books. One of my favorite is Is bowing down to Guru Granth Sahib ji idol worship.

Anyways. What you guys are both saying is Ganika was not in hindu because she didnt follow strictly hindiu teachings. But she was saved due to japping naam. Which is a sikhi concept so she was a sikh. 

Some ppl argue that only the name waheguru can save you. But really meditation is meditation. And no one word can limit waheguru or his mercy. This was given by our guru so we should honor it.

Well put Bhenji. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/4/2020 at 5:31 PM, Not2Cool2Argue said:

 

You guys both believe the same thing. But are describing it differently and talking past each other. 

We don't believe the same thing.  He believes being a hindu, the person can do naam simran and then achieve mukhti.  Gurbani does not accept this view point.  Therefore I do not accept it is true.

By sikhi, Akalifauj does not mean being amritdhari or folowing the religion sikhism. He means the truth.

No, you could not be more wrong.  Sikhi is about Gurbani.  From Gurbani comes Gurmat teachings which are the truth.  Truth comes from Gurbani.  

Like all the bhagats, they were born in hindu families but rejected most of what their religion and society taught. Instead they focused on the universal truth.

No such thing as universal truth.  The truth comes from Gurbani.  No other figure or holy text or person can say what is the truth.  Gurbani demonstrated the truth and stated the truth.  The bhagats were lost; they could not tell what was naam and hukam. Only when Akal Purakh took form and showed them Gurmat, did they come to realize the truth.   

And because it was universal truth, their bani is included in guru granth sahib ji.

The bhagats bani was included in Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji because it is dhur ki bani.  The Bani came directly from Akal Purakh.  The bhagats did not come up with any Bani.  It was all Akal Purakh giving them the Bani.  Not a single word is coming from their mind or thought process or trial and  error.   

Same with the sufi fakirs like bhagat farid ji. They were born muslims but rejected some aspects of islam. And embraced universal truth. And because they believed in truth their bani aligned with sikhi which is also truth.

This is why the new generation is sinking.  They don't read Gurbani.   They rely on their minds to make up stories that they think has a perfectly tied bow on top.  It's all lies, not a single peice of truth lies in here.  What I wrote above perfectly shows your mistake.  No bhagat knew what the truth is.  They had to meet Satguru.  Only after meeting Satguru did they know what Gurbani is and they followed Gurmat teachings to achieve mukhti by the kirpa of Satguru. Without Gurbani there is no truth.

And Satguru is needed to give naam. But satguru is an aspect of God. It has existed since the world was created. And was manifest as Guru Nanak dev ji. But before 1469, Satguru or sargunn saroop of waheguru appeared to certain ppl and gave them naam. After 1469, that sargunn saroop of waheguru is manofest in sri guru granth sahib ji.

This is correct according to Sikhi. 

Anyways. What you guys are both saying is Ganika was not in hindu because she didnt follow strictly hindiu teachings. But she was saved due to japping naam. Which is a sikhi concept so she was a sikh. 

Don't put words in my mouth.  Are you a 3ho cult follower?  Because they try to capitalize on the work of others by taking what the person said and adding their twisted take to it.  So it looks like the 3ho is in agreement with the other person but they add manmat to Gurmat teachings.  Ganika was faithful person to Akal Purakh.   This is what Gurbani says and this is what she is.  Japji Sahib says, those who are faithful, will meet Vaheguru.   Japji Sahib speaks to many others, but this will become a very long post. 

Some ppl argue that only the name waheguru can save you. But really meditation is meditation. And no one word can limit waheguru or his mercy. This was given by our guru so we should honor it.

meditation is meditation!! What kind of nonsense is this.  Where in Gurbani does it say meditation is meditation?  Gurbani says remember Akal Purakh.   Gurbani doesn't say touch the tip of the thumb to the tip of the index finger and repeat Vaheguru.   This manmat practice is done by 3ho, which I can only guess are you friends or even spiritual teachers.  Gurbani says remember Akal Purakh while sitting standing and sleeping.  This is how we are told to meditate.   Gurbani says learn from the Guru and forget everyone else.   Yet, people want to sink, so they go to the 3ho cults, and babas, and others to find peace.  Nothing will be attained from these people other than more misery.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The UK/Kenyan Style is actually the original Punjabi style modified. Look at Milkha Singh, this style (square/rectangle last larr) was tied by most Pre-partition Sikh men, My Nani Ji's dad also tied it (never visited Kenya or Africa). It's a single dastar, starched with punjabi style pooni tied with the last larr left longer/ "rectangular". Sikhs who left India for Kenya around 1940s took this style with them but adapted it to be smaller, with a chunj to substitute for a lack of nok (beak), or it just looked like a flat, v shaped dumalla). They changed the pooni to folded instead of corner/stretched too. In Punjab, the style changed to Patiala Shahi and fabrics which didn't need starch were developed so ppl started tying unstarched Shahi paggs, with double fabric. But before around 1940, there was almost NO Sardaarji who didn't starch his Pagg (even Granthis didn't tie everyday except gol dastars). The first "wave" of Sikhs to reach Britain were kenyans, not Punjabis so they brought this "Kenyan style" dastar with them to England, making it known as the "UK style Dastar" (a folded and starched Dastar with a triangle point at the front). Cos this was the norm in England, even Punjabi Sikhs (not Kenyan) who arrived later just followed suit Most Kenyan Sikhs were Tarkhans, so the first Sikhs in the UK were too for the most part. So this style's known as the Tarkhan Pagg, but this isn't true cos Tarkhans in India tie the Punjabi Style and some Jatts in Kenya tie the UK/Kenyan style. My family's Jatt Sikh from PUNJAB and we all tie Punjabi Style but with starch, so it's not a caste thing.
    • how to get the physical copy in uk or Panjab?
    • "sabh sikhan ko hukam hai, GURU MAYEYO GRANTH". If HUMAN BEINGS could show us how to be perfect sikhs then Guru Gobind Singh ji Maharaj wouldn't have ended the line of human Gurus and passed gurgaddi over to Guru Granth Sahib Ji Mahraj. Remember that Guru Nanak Dev Ji Maharaj predicted that we were only one of thousands of universes hundreds of years before science discovered this. The Gurus were capable of predicting the future; if they wanted us following one select human in the future they would have predicted them and told us who to follow. DON'T insinuate I'm a fake sikh loooool. Cos you know what "Sikhs" who follow humans like YOU do are called? Namdharis. Sikhs only listen and answer to the 10 Gurus, Guru Granth Sahib Ji and Waheguruji. Nobody else. That's part of why Sikhi is so beautiful, it's the simplicity. We can ACKNOWLEDGE what other people say but not when it goes against the orders or nature of our Gurus (in this case, using the most modern & effective martial arts/ weapons like they did instead of blindly trying to preserve history, then thinking a 300 year old martial art would still be effective today). If Sikhi was abt preserving history rather than practicality, then Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj could've given us a caveman club instead of a kirpan/2 foot long sword. but then we go into the whole "is a gun a kirpan" argument...
    • Ridiculous. Just chuck your history away because it's not gurbani. What a joker.. typical modern day Sikh. "Sikhism" 🤣🤣🤣 If it wasn't for rattan Singh bhangu how would you even know of your itias? Someone like you just came out of thin air.
    • Shastar vidiya . The basis of the unarmed is foundation for the armed combat.  There can be a point where u can't get to your weapons. What will you do? Of course the khalsa had unrmed skills. If your sword or weapons broke. What would you do? Grappling etc. wrestling etc.    Unarmed combat is known as "platha"
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use