Jump to content

Has any islamic organisation condemed the attack on Afghan Sikhs in afghanistan?


genie
 Share

Recommended Posts

Had die hard suicide Sikh fighters entered a masjid and started shooting up the place killing men, women and children. Destroying their qurans and generally causing mayhem there would be no end of Sikhs and sikh organisations condeming such people and attacks.

So my question is has anyone found even 1 islamic religious or political organisation that has condemned the incident and issued a fatwa against such muslims and incidents to not to take place again?

I have read somewhere the pakistani government and turkish government condemned the attack however to my knowledge no Islamic body in where in the world has said anything or offered their support to afghan sikhs in their time of dire need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when have they ever condemn it?  how many muslims do you see out there protesting against terrorist attacks or muslim grooming gangs? none    yet when trump was to visit this country throngs of them were out there protesting.  deep down a lot of them dont think theres anything wrong with terrorist attacks.

when EDL came down to our town to march against a Islamic center being built here, guess who was at the front line protesting against the EDL?  yup    sikhs!     it was absolutely embarrassing! we were like what the f are they doing 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the notion of outside orgs/institutes being remotely concerned about a minority like Sikhs is really quite naive.  

I think we've really screwed up by looking at orgs like Unicef or foreign governments to help us in political conflicts. It simply doesn't work. If we had loads of oil or some really rare resources there then maybe it would be different (for selfish reasons on part of the so called 'helpers'). Look at how we were looking at the UK government to help during the 80s, only to subsequently find that  Thatcher was actually  sending military advisors to advise on the attack on Harmandir Sahib (decades afterwards). 

This political puerility is embarrasing and destructive.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And to put it frankly, given the amount of murders/terrorist attacks over there, this would be seen as a blip by the locals. That's not to wash over the unfortunate and sad events, but they do have a context. The amount of time sullay over there have done this to other sullay probably couldn't be counted. To the indigenous of Afghanistan, this is probably nothing. It's normal life. We have to grasp that. 

Either you choose to live there and accept the risks - or move if you can. I'm no fan of India but it has to be said, the recent offer of refugee status for Sikhs should possibly be seriously considered if SIkhs are unhappy about life in Afghanistan.   

This type of stuff isn't about to stop anytime soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for the debate that i've seen online where pakistani muslim's claiming it's indian r&aw who did it or hindustani's claiming its pakistani isi who funded and helped Islamic state-khorasan group to attack Sikhs. i think evidence and motive points firmly towards someone funding these sunni salafi islamo-nazis who hate sikhs, shia's and other non-muslims. Could be afghan intelligence agency or american CIA? Strange how everytime american CIA is involved innocent Sikhs seem to get murdered by Jihadi scumbags. Maybe they are trying to draw india into afghanistan? but we know india doesnt really care about Sikhs so for them its just collateral damage.

1) The same fringe terrorist mainly pasthun muslim group is well known for attacking the afghan taliban and shia minorities.

2) Sikhs have been targeted by them before last year. They have links with gandu haqqani network and dallah gulbaddin hekmartyr.

It would not be in the interests of R&AW to get involved in muslim sectarian warfare by aiding IS-K in killing weaponless sitting duck afghan shia's who are targeted by afghan taliban too. Rather its in interests of R&AW / indian establishment to setup shia milita groups and afghan sikh armed groups to act as proxies attack anti-india enemies to make space for indian troops to eventually come in to counter pakistani involvement in afghanistan. It is in the interests of india to keep strong presence of indians and afghan Sikhs within the gurdwara complex so that there's communication and intelligence sharing there.

So in conclusion this heinous attack is in the interests of dallay sunni salafi islamic nutjobs to ethnically cleanse /  genocide shia's, sikhs, hindus and others from afghanistan to have their evil totalitarian rule over the land.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

I think the notion of outside orgs/institutes being remotely concerned about a minority like Sikhs is really quite naive.  

I think we've really screwed up by looking at orgs like Unicef or foreign governments to help us in political conflicts. It simply doesn't work. If we had loads of oil or some really rare resources there then maybe it would be different (for selfish reasons on part of the so called 'helpers'). Look at how we were looking at the UK government to help during the 80s, only to subsequently find that  Thatcher was actually  sending military advisors to advise on the attack on Harmandir Sahib (decades afterwards). 

This political puerility is embarrasing and destructive.  

yup very embarrassing we have low IQ well meaning Sikhs licking the backsides of islamics to make sure their feelings are not hurt even when its the very sunni islamics that been harming and killing sikh kids and grooming sikh women for conversion to islam. Its shameful and disgusting we have our own Sikhs not able to stand up to islam and muslims and tell them whats what. Such coward rats they have become. It's only us who call a spade a spade and tell the sullah terrorist whats what.... giving islamic antics and teachings a good bash and exposure as and when its deserved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

I think the notion of outside orgs/institutes being remotely concerned about a minority like Sikhs is really quite naive.  

I think we've really screwed up by looking at orgs like Unicef or foreign governments to help us in political conflicts. It simply doesn't work. If we had loads of oil or some really rare resources there then maybe it would be different (for selfish reasons on part of the so called 'helpers'). Look at how we were looking at the UK government to help during the 80s, only to subsequently find that  Thatcher was actually  sending military advisors to advise on the attack on Harmandir Sahib (decades afterwards). 

This political puerility is embarrasing and destructive.  

If a list was to be prepared about people who have fallen from glory to being perpetually enslaved , and having the most naive people , 

then it would be the sikhs at the top i guess.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AjeetSingh2019 said:

If a list was to be prepared about people who have fallen from glory to being perpetually enslaved , and having the most naive people , 

then it would be the sikhs at the top i guess.

 

Sikhs are not naive.  Had this been true, then we would not have successful Sikhs in various businesses.   Sikhs collectively treat humans as humans regardless of faith in moments of crisis. 

Muslims organizations will not put out statements condemning the attack.  But that will not change our Sikh values and practices.  Whether cut in half, blown to pieces, or cut limb from limb, Sikhs upheld their values in every moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Akalifauj said:

Sikhs are not naive.  Had this been true, then we would not have successful Sikhs in various businesses.   Sikhs collectively treat humans as humans regardless of faith in moments of crisis. 

Muslims organizations will not put out statements condemning the attack.  But that will not change our Sikh values and practices.  Whether cut in half, blown to pieces, or cut limb from limb, Sikhs upheld their values in every moment.

There's treating people as human being and there's doling out scarce resources to those who are not only ungrateful but also whose ideology is a clear and present danger. Those moorkh Sikhs protesting against the CAA where actually protesting against a favourable treatment that would have been given to fellow Sikhs who died in Kabul. In essence they have blood on their hands as to them their commitment to being 'woke' was more important than the safety of Sikhs in countries like Afghanistan and Pakistan. Some of those moorakhs rather than looking at what their actions had done are even now so stubborn that they are doubling down and calling those who have called out their dhimmi actions as spreading 'hatred'! 

The most ironic was that mahan moorkh Amarinder Singh calling on the Afghan president to help the Sikhs massacred in Kabul! He the useful id.iot of the Congress party was the first CM to say that he would not allow the CAA to function in Punjab.. ie he would not allow Afghan Sikhs to have speedy access to asylum and citizenship. Is that your so-called Sikh 'values and practices' in action

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, genie said:

So my question is has anyone found even 1 islamic religious or political organisation that has condemned the incident and issued a fatwa against such muslims and incidents to not to take place again?

There's been some statements of condemnation by some organisations and some Afghan citizens both in Kabul and abroad. But given that Muslims can lie in order to gain advantage then I do not put much store by it. In order to understand what the local Afghans think of the Sikhs we need to look at how they were being treated at other times and not just when there is a massacre like this. From what I have read these Sikhs were pretty much besieged in this compound, their children not being able to attend school as they get bullied by the Aghan kids. The elder also suffered daily insults when ever they venture out of their compounds. A lot were being told to go back to their country, India and it was clear that they are not wanted in Afghanistan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use