What pakistan based extremist muslim hate preachers teach about Sikhs

[genie]

khadim hussain rizvi  the new kuttah Islamic brelvi sunni extremist molvi praising the killings of hindus and sikhs.

 

 

[puzzled]

16 minutes ago, genie said:

khadim hussain rizvi  the new kuttah Islamic brelvi sunni extremist molvi praising the killings of hindus and sikhs.

 

 

i watched a doc about his guy on bbc    he is nothing but a hate preacher   a lot of human right activists, lawyers  get killed by mullahs like him     they have crazy amount of power in pakistan     people and even politicians fear them    

[genie]

2 hours ago, puzzled said:

i watched a doc about his guy on bbc    he is nothing but a hate preacher   a lot of human right activists, lawyers  get killed by mullahs like him     they have crazy amount of power in pakistan     people and even politicians fear them    

The pakistani army had this retard in prison for protesting against the removal of blasphemy laws, he then brought out his goons to block traffic and cause chaos on pakistani roads. The molvi's are the real bastaards of pakistan who get their orders and funding from rich arabs and then they put pressure on the pakistani government and army to do things that they want them to do.

When Sikhs from pakistan tell us they are safe and happy in pakistan you know their lying they can't speak out of their true feelings because of molvi's like this guy making their lives very difficult. They are 2nd most oppressed Sikh community in the world the first being afghan sikhs.

[genie]

The pakistani muslims main grievance with Sikh rule of maharajah ranjit singh was that he allegedly used the open air courtyard of badshahi masjid for his troops horses. That they did not allow the azaan to be called from minarets (which was used to disturb the the peace and harmony of punjab). That ranjit singh allegedly opened coffin of a dead muslim woman and stole her quran? (mad unfounded accusations). At least the Sikhs let the muslims remain muslims during his raj. At least the Sikhs didnt kill muslims or oppressed them to the extent they rather died than live under Sikh rule.

The Sikhs understood the needs of muslims and let them live and let live as long as they did not rebel against the Sikh government and as long as they didnt harm the Sikhs. Things were beautiful its only when the arab influenced wahaabi salaafi type jihadi extremist muslims came and british empire invaders came did they disturb the peace and brotherhood of glorious Sikh ruled punjab.

Now compare that to the zulum and brutalities musilm rulers inflicted on the Sikhs and other punjabis in the past. And to this day the amount of attacks and blood shed of Sikhs is unforgivable and intolerable. Yet the muslims of indian subcontinent have the cheek to say Sikh rule oppressed muslims and so hold this deep hate for us.

[proactive]

9 hours ago, genie said:

The pakistani muslims main grievance with Sikh rule of maharajah ranjit singh was that he allegedly used the open air courtyard of badshahi masjid for his troops horses. That they did not allow the azaan to be called from minarets (which was used to disturb the the peace and harmony of punjab). That ranjit singh allegedly opened coffin of a dead muslim woman and stole her quran? (mad unfounded accusations). At least the Sikhs let the muslims remain muslims during his raj. At least the Sikhs didnt kill muslims or oppressed them to the extent they rather died than live under Sikh rule.

The Sikhs understood the needs of muslims and let them live and let live as long as they did not rebel against the Sikh government and as long as they didnt harm the Sikhs. Things were beautiful its only when the arab influenced wahaabi salaafi type jihadi extremist muslims came and british empire invaders came did they disturb the peace and brotherhood of glorious Sikh ruled punjab.

Now compare that to the zulum and brutalities musilm rulers inflicted on the Sikhs and other punjabis in the past. And to this day the amount of attacks and blood shed of Sikhs is unforgivable and intolerable. Yet the muslims of indian subcontinent have the cheek to say Sikh rule oppressed muslims and so hold this deep hate for us.

It's interesting that the Uggardanti written before the Misls and then Maharaja Ranjit Singh set up Sikh rule in Punjab predicted that the victory of the Sikhs would lead to the destruction of both Islam and Hinduism in the areas where the Sikhs ruled. It is interesting to speculate what the Punjab would be like today had the Sikhs between 1770s to 1849 actively persecuted the Muslims, especially the intolerant Qazis and Mullahs. I mean for Muslims the fact that Muslim rule has been replaced by Sikh rule is enough of an 'oppression' then why did the Sikhs of that era not give the Muslims something to really complain about. 

It's  quite surprising that Maharaja Ranjit Singh who has been presented as a secular ruler still know that allowing the Azan is a Muslim declaration of supremacy against other faiths and as such banned it in his kingdom. One of the chief reasons that the Qadianis urged Muslims to support British rule was that under their rule the Azan had again been allowed to be called from the minarets. 

[puzzled]

45 minutes ago, proactive said:

It's  quite surprising that Maharaja Ranjit Singh who has been presented as a secular ruler still know that allowing the Azan is a Muslim declaration of supremacy against other faiths and as such banned it in his kingdom. One of the chief reasons that the Qadianis urged Muslims to support British rule was that under their rule the Azan had again been allowed to be called from the minarets. 

Stories like maharaja ranjit singh kissing the quran and saying he has 1 eye to see every1 equally are just fake folk stories. 

[puzzled]

When m.ranjit singh married a musalmani nachan wali   the sikh community were far more triggered about her being a musalmani than they were about her being a nachan wali.  It's the fact she was a muslamani.   

He was punished by akali phula Singh not for marrying a twaif but for marrying a musalman 

And that says a lot   about sikh peoples untrust towards muslims at the time! 

 

[shastarSingh]

Aurangabadi wrote very bad words for Sikhs like kafirs, trouble makers , farebi (deceivers) etc.but in the end says that " sikhan vargi sangharsh sheel(fighter) ate shaant subhaa(peace loving) kaum paida nahin hoyee".