Jump to content

What pakistan based extremist muslim hate preachers teach about Sikhs


genie
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, genie said:

khadim hussain rizvi  the new kuttah Islamic brelvi sunni extremist molvi praising the killings of hindus and sikhs.

 

 

i watched a doc about his guy on bbc    he is nothing but a hate preacher   a lot of human right activists, lawyers  get killed by mullahs like him     they have crazy amount of power in pakistan     people and even politicians fear them    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, puzzled said:

i watched a doc about his guy on bbc    he is nothing but a hate preacher   a lot of human right activists, lawyers  get killed by mullahs like him     they have crazy amount of power in pakistan     people and even politicians fear them    

The pakistani army had this retard in prison for protesting against the removal of blasphemy laws, he then brought out his goons to block traffic and cause chaos on pakistani roads. The molvi's are the real bastaards of pakistan who get their orders and funding from rich arabs and then they put pressure on the pakistani government and army to do things that they want them to do.

When Sikhs from pakistan tell us they are safe and happy in pakistan you know their lying they can't speak out of their true feelings because of molvi's like this guy making their lives very difficult. They are 2nd most oppressed Sikh community in the world the first being afghan sikhs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pakistani muslims main grievance with Sikh rule of maharajah ranjit singh was that he allegedly used the open air courtyard of badshahi masjid for his troops horses. That they did not allow the azaan to be called from minarets (which was used to disturb the the peace and harmony of punjab). That ranjit singh allegedly opened coffin of a dead muslim woman and stole her quran? (mad unfounded accusations). At least the Sikhs let the muslims remain muslims during his raj. At least the Sikhs didnt kill muslims or oppressed them to the extent they rather died than live under Sikh rule.

The Sikhs understood the needs of muslims and let them live and let live as long as they did not rebel against the Sikh government and as long as they didnt harm the Sikhs. Things were beautiful its only when the arab influenced wahaabi salaafi type jihadi extremist muslims came and british empire invaders came did they disturb the peace and brotherhood of glorious Sikh ruled punjab.

Now compare that to the zulum and brutalities musilm rulers inflicted on the Sikhs and other punjabis in the past. And to this day the amount of attacks and blood shed of Sikhs is unforgivable and intolerable. Yet the muslims of indian subcontinent have the cheek to say Sikh rule oppressed muslims and so hold this deep hate for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, genie said:

The pakistani muslims main grievance with Sikh rule of maharajah ranjit singh was that he allegedly used the open air courtyard of badshahi masjid for his troops horses. That they did not allow the azaan to be called from minarets (which was used to disturb the the peace and harmony of punjab). That ranjit singh allegedly opened coffin of a dead muslim woman and stole her quran? (mad unfounded accusations). At least the Sikhs let the muslims remain muslims during his raj. At least the Sikhs didnt kill muslims or oppressed them to the extent they rather died than live under Sikh rule.

The Sikhs understood the needs of muslims and let them live and let live as long as they did not rebel against the Sikh government and as long as they didnt harm the Sikhs. Things were beautiful its only when the arab influenced wahaabi salaafi type jihadi extremist muslims came and british empire invaders came did they disturb the peace and brotherhood of glorious Sikh ruled punjab.

Now compare that to the zulum and brutalities musilm rulers inflicted on the Sikhs and other punjabis in the past. And to this day the amount of attacks and blood shed of Sikhs is unforgivable and intolerable. Yet the muslims of indian subcontinent have the cheek to say Sikh rule oppressed muslims and so hold this deep hate for us.

It's interesting that the Uggardanti written before the Misls and then Maharaja Ranjit Singh set up Sikh rule in Punjab predicted that the victory of the Sikhs would lead to the destruction of both Islam and Hinduism in the areas where the Sikhs ruled. It is interesting to speculate what the Punjab would be like today had the Sikhs between 1770s to 1849 actively persecuted the Muslims, especially the intolerant Qazis and Mullahs. I mean for Muslims the fact that Muslim rule has been replaced by Sikh rule is enough of an 'oppression' then why did the Sikhs of that era not give the Muslims something to really complain about. 

It's  quite surprising that Maharaja Ranjit Singh who has been presented as a secular ruler still know that allowing the Azan is a Muslim declaration of supremacy against other faiths and as such banned it in his kingdom. One of the chief reasons that the Qadianis urged Muslims to support British rule was that under their rule the Azan had again been allowed to be called from the minarets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, proactive said:

It's  quite surprising that Maharaja Ranjit Singh who has been presented as a secular ruler still know that allowing the Azan is a Muslim declaration of supremacy against other faiths and as such banned it in his kingdom. One of the chief reasons that the Qadianis urged Muslims to support British rule was that under their rule the Azan had again been allowed to be called from the minarets. 

Stories like maharaja ranjit singh kissing the quran and saying he has 1 eye to see every1 equally are just fake folk stories. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When m.ranjit singh married a musalmani nachan wali   the sikh community were far more triggered about her being a musalmani than they were about her being a nachan wali.  It's the fact she was a muslamani.   

He was punished by akali phula Singh not for marrying a twaif but for marrying a musalman 

And that says a lot   about sikh peoples untrust towards muslims at the time! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use