Jump to content

nihangs fight with punjab police


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jonny101 said:

The Muslim is different from the Hindu. If a Muslim hates you, you can sense his hatred or hostility. But the Hindu will only like you if you please him or fight for him. They praise you if you fight the Muslims. But the moment you fight for your self respect or fight for Sikhi and Punjab then he will say the Sikh should be shot.

and thats EXACTLY what muslims do...bro they like you defend you when we talk about India or hinduvsta...as soon as you mention Sikhs treatment in islamic countries or pakistan side of Khalsa Raj...they get butt hurt..and wont say anything 

Those muslims that were praising Singhs for CAA protests didnt say anything what happened Afghan

We have NO friends...the sooner we realise the better....

You think pakistanis will give us Lahore Nanak Sahib for Khalistan hahahaha

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a perfect example of why Sikhs should be neutral the hindu and muslim janta only like you when you side with them or when your against the other.

The nihungs often seen as the most loyal of Sikh for india and historically been on a anti-khalistan flex with many of their groups do pooja to hindu idols and have respect for hindu acts of worship and traditions like doing jot arti they are now finding out what most hindutani's and hindu's generally really think of them over one very small isolated incident.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Jonny101 said:

The Muslim is different from the Hindu. If a Muslim hates you, you can sense his hatred or hostility. But the Hindu will only like you if you please him or fight for him. They praise you if you fight the Muslims. But the moment you fight for your self respect or fight for Sikhi and Punjab then he will say the Sikh should be shot.

Finally someone has said it well . Perhaps truth has never been so succinctly put.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there was some research done some years ago showing that of all the communities, it was the Sikh community that feared the police the most. This is understandable given when the Punjab police did to a whole generation of Sikhs. I think Sikhs have now reached a stage where they suffer from the Stockholm syndrome they have actively started to identity with their oppressors. This is why the fact that these Nihangs took on the police is so amazing. 99.99% of Punjabis would have just taken a beating and with folded hands begged for mercy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, proactive said:

I think there was some research done some years ago showing that of all the communities, it was the Sikh community that feared the police the most.

yup i remember reading that too   rural sikhs had more fear of police than any other community. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, proactive said:

I think there was some research done some years ago showing that of all the communities, it was the Sikh community that feared the police the most. This is understandable given when the Punjab police did to a whole generation of Sikhs. I think Sikhs have now reached a stage where they suffer from the Stockholm syndrome they have actively started to identity with their oppressors. This is why the fact that these Nihangs took on the police is so amazing. 99.99% of Punjabis would have just taken a beating and with folded hands begged for mercy. 

True but also dont forget out of all the communities it is the punjab police and punjabi/indian government that fears the Sikhs the most.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, proactive said:

I think there was some research done some years ago showing that of all the communities, it was the Sikh community that feared the police the most. This is understandable given when the Punjab police did to a whole generation of Sikhs. I think Sikhs have now reached a stage where they suffer from the Stockholm syndrome they have actively started to identity with their oppressors. This is why the fact that these Nihangs took on the police is so amazing. 99.99% of Punjabis would have just taken a beating and with folded hands begged for mercy. 

I believe the attack on Harmindar Sahib was more than just an act of physical destruction. It was also symbolic and it was engineered to cause mass emotional and psychological trauma, the effects of which are still in evidence today whether people realise it or not. They wanted to give Sikhs a black eye from which we'd think twice before ever challenging their might again. Their plan has worked if some of the responses here are any indication. I can understand the fear and reluctance for escalation from those who directly lost loved ones during the pogroms, but to see this desire to "keep our heads down" and be loyal little Indian citizens in the hope they leave us alone, is not a sensible approach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

I believe the attack on Harmindar Sahib was more than just an act of physical destruction. It was also symbolic and it was engineered to cause mass emotional and psychological trauma, the effects of which are still in evidence today whether people realise it or not. They wanted to give Sikhs a black eye from which we'd think twice before ever challenging their might again. Their plan has worked if some of the responses here are any indication. I can understand the fear and reluctance for escalation from those who directly lost loved ones during the pogroms, but to see this desire to "keep our heads down" and be loyal little Indian citizens in the hope they leave us alone, is not a sensible approach. 

Indira gandhi and Margret thatcher both had personal hatred and fear for Sikhs. They were genuine Sikhaphobes. Margret thatcher feared Sikhs after seeing in southall they would not let racist white extremists of national front bully harass and attack them on a daily and so the Sikhs along with other minority communities rioted in 1980. And indira gandhi had personal enmity with punjabi sikh politicians for opposing her emergency laws and dictatorship rule in late 1970s. She was also daughter of nehru gandhi the prime minister of india who called Sikhs a tribe of criminals because they oppose to nehru's agreement to divide the anti-sikh racist british white establishment in dividing punjab leaving the Sikh kaum with no nation no government to safeguard their homes, lives, security and interests.

And suprise suprise we learnt in 2014 that yes these two evil powers these two evil witches (indira and margret) had plotted together to teach uppity equal rights wanting Sikhs a lesson. But what they didnt realise their over reaction and their conspiracy to genocide the Sikhs with their huge military operation didnt quell the Sikhs in fact it ignited a passion in Sikhs where lapsed punjabi Sikhs who were atheists in all but name started to become religious Sikhs determined to fight the indian state causing it so many problems. This is what the British indian troops did in 1919 on vaisakhi day at jalliwalah bagh they massacred 1000 peaceful punjabi's mostly Sikhs which ignited a rebellion that eventually lead the downfall of the british rule in india and destruction of the british empire.

The Sikhs very small in number are very influential when they get roused up this is why world powers of the past and today fear Sikhs and do not want them to get their own nation state. The SJW liberal stupid low IQ langari Sikhs are what the enemies of Sikhs want Sikhs to be as good slaves good SJW's getting rolled over by everyone and feeding the world with their own communities resources. What they dont want is the true Sikh who is master of his own destiny and wants best for his own community first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, genie said:

Indira gandhi and Margret thatcher both had personal hatred and fear for Sikhs. They were genuine Sikhaphobes. Margret thatcher feared Sikhs after seeing in southall they would not let racist white extremists of national front bully harass and attack them on a daily and so the Sikhs along with other minority communities rioted in 1980. And indira gandhi had personal enmity with punjabi sikh politicians for opposing her emergency laws and dictatorship rule in late 1970s. She was also daughter of nehru gandhi the prime minister of india who called Sikhs a tribe of criminals because they oppose to nehru's agreement to divide the anti-sikh racist british white establishment in dividing punjab leaving the Sikh kaum with no nation no government to safeguard their homes, lives, security and interests.

And suprise suprise we learnt in 2014 that yes these two evil powers these two evil witches (indira and margret) had plotted together to teach uppity equal rights wanting Sikhs a lesson. But what they didnt realise their over reaction and their conspiracy to genocide the Sikhs with their huge military operation didnt quell the Sikhs in fact it ignited a passion in Sikhs where lapsed punjabi Sikhs who were atheists in all but name started to become religious Sikhs determined to fight the indian state causing it so many problems. This is what the British indian troops did in 1919 on vaisakhi day at jalliwalah bagh they massacred 1000 peaceful punjabi's mostly Sikhs which ignited a rebellion that eventually lead the downfall of the british rule in india and destruction of the british empire.

The Sikhs very small in number are very influential when they get roused up this is why world powers of the past and today fear Sikhs and do not want them to get their own nation state. The SJW liberal stupid low IQ langari Sikhs are what the enemies of Sikhs want Sikhs to be as good slaves good SJW's getting rolled over by everyone and feeding the world with their own communities resources. What they dont want is the true Sikh who is master of his own destiny and wants best for his own community first.

Also Indra has shitee Muslim blood.most muslims support congress party and gandhi family.......Indra is also adored in Pakistan...

"Pakistan didn't care about Khalistan. Bhutto wanted revenge for Bangladesh and cynically exploited the Sikhs.'
 

https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/interview/story/19931215-you-cant-get-khalistan-through-military-movement-says-jagat-singh-chouhan-811922-1993-12-15

That Bhutto family of Pakistan is mirror of gandhi family India and bjp mirror to far right islamic group pakistan

A Muslim army officer jusifying what happend ...Israr Rahim Khan 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use