Jump to content

Sikh assassins


puzzled
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, ChardikalaUK said:

Why did Udham Singh have to call himself Ram Muhammad Singh? It just goes to show the subservient nature of our people even back then.

The reason Bhagat Singh cut his hair and denounced his Sikh roots was to be accepted by the Hindu masses and he admitted this himself.

Yh but it was a different time and different situation. He witnessed jallianwala bagh massacre and saw the goreh treat indians regardless of religion like crap. Just imagine the cruelty he must of witnessed and the anger it must created within him. Indians were more tight knit back then especially during the independence movement and he killed the gorah for revenge. Back then every indian had that anger within which triggered the assassination but he was one of the few which had the courage to do it. The assassination was a reflection of the indian peoples anger and frustration of that time. So I can see why he used that name. He saw himself as the voice of indians.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ChardikalaUK said:

Why did Udham Singh have to call himself Ram Muhammad Singh? It just goes to show the subservient nature of our people even back then.

The reason Bhagat Singh cut his hair and denounced his Sikh roots was to be accepted by the Hindu masses and he admitted this himself.

Secularism started to infect Sikh freedom fighters during the 20th century too. As for Udham Singh's name. Tribune India wrote an article about this a few years ago. He wrote Muhammad Singh Azad. Later Hindus journalists added Ram to that name and popularised it. But originally Ram was never there in that name. It was just Muhammad Singh Azad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, puzzled said:

Yh but it was a different time and different situation. He witnessed jallianwala bagh massacre and saw the goreh treat indians regardless of religion like crap. Just imagine the cruelty he must of witnessed and the anger it must created within him. Indians were more tight knit back then especially during the independence movement and he killed the gorah for revenge. Back then every indian had that anger within which triggered the assassination but he was one of the few which had the courage to do it. The assassination was a reflection of the indian peoples anger and frustration of that time. So I can see why he used that name. He saw himself as the voice of indians.

 

 

 

11 minutes ago, Jonny101 said:

Secularism started to infect Sikh freedom fighters during the 20th century too. As for Udham Singh's name. Tribune India write an article about this a few years ago. He write Muhammad Singh Azad. Later Hindus journalists added Ram to that name and popularised it. But originally Ram was never there in that name. It was just Muhammad Singh Azad.

Yes I understand that it was a different time then but it seems like it was only Sikhs who did such things and sacrificed their identity by changing their names. Where was the muslim or hindu equivalent? 

At the end of the day the muslims got Pakistan and the hindus got India, we got nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Sikh assassins are the glorious military commando's of the Sikh kaum and desh.

When a true Sikh has given himself to Waheguru and is ready to do active service for Sikhi he no longer cares for this dunya has to offer no longer cares what anyone in this dunya has to say about them and will take part in shaheedi dharam yudh ops to take out tyrants who harmed Sikhs. Once a Sikh has reached that level of dedication and spirituality there is no turning back as they are determined to do ultimate sewa for Sikhi, These people don't go harming innocent civilians but oppressive villains who have sikh blood on their hands and thus they are gems of Sikhi, true lions true valiant soldiers who being honour and nobility to the panth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use