Jump to content

Allah shows his mercy on Derby Gurudwara by attacking it today


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, ChardikalaUK said:

Even when apne say we saved Hinduism from going extinct is silly. It's simply not the case. Whilst we ended Islamic rule in North West India the Hindu Marathas took over the rest of India. We had no influence in central  South and Eastern India.

We need to stop making claims which are clearly not true.

This is a claim that's being picked up in recent times by Hindutva types, and they are debunking it with vigour. I've only ever heard this sentiment expressed by hyped-up parcharaks. It's misleading. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, puzzled said:

Europe needs to quickly invest in some of these folks and ship them over asap! 

Refworld | Myanmar government orders state media not to use 'Rohingya'

Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar: The spectre of ethnic violence ...

 

Even the little ones would do! 

Buddhist monks with guns - Myanmar - National Geography 2013 ...Against the Stream: Religion and Violence: Navy Yard Shooting EditionThe Temple at the Top of the Hill (Shangri-La) | Albatz Travel ...

 

BOSS

Young Guns Photograph by David Longstreath

 

GOOD LORD ! IRONY DIED A MILLION DEaTHS !

 

a religion which is firm believer of non violence which even made Ashoka drop his sword has today picked guns .

And  we the so called martial race , display chhatti parkaar ke shastr has become so pussied out. 

godd xD 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

This is a claim that's being picked up in recent times by Hindutva types, and they are debunking it with vigour. I've only ever heard this sentiment expressed by hyped-up parcharaks. It's misleading. 

Then the Hindus make stupid claims like 'Sikhism was created to protect Hinduism from muslims'.

What are we? Bodyguards for hire?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ChardikalaUK said:

Even when apne say we saved Hinduism from going extinct is silly. It's simply not the case. Whilst we ended Islamic rule in North West India the Hindu Marathas took over the rest of India. We had no influence in central  South and Eastern India.

We need to stop making claims which are clearly not true.

Yh that's so true! It was in the pubjab region and neighbouring areas where we saved hindus and defeated muslims.

The whole sikhs saved hinduism from extinction is silly! I never understood y some sikhs say that! 

But that being said we were the first ones to face the invading Afghans every time they entered india 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AjeetSingh2019 said:

GOOD LORD ! IRONY DIED A MILLION DEaTHS !

a religion which is firm believer of non violence which even made Ashoka drop his sword has today picked guns .

And  we the so called martial race , display chhatti parkaar ke shastr has become so pussied out. 

godd xD 

One of the funniest things I've heard in recent times is when someone said regarding the Rohingya issue: "How f*****g unbearable must a religion and its followers (Islam) be, that it forces BUDDHISTS to become militant in order to reassert themselves?"

Lmao, the media only ever presents the results of the fightback, yet why do they never broach the reasons for why a group like the Buddhists had to resort to those means? 

And why is it only where there's a growing Muslim population in a country where they are a minority -- as they edge closer to that magic 10% population mark -- where these things happen?  It's almost as if the response to Islamic encroachment arises because Muslims decide to instigate the next part of their plan once they've reached a certain demographical number where they feel they can "affect" matters in society... hmmmm....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AjeetSingh2019 said:

 

GOOD LORD ! IRONY DIED A MILLION DEaTHS !

 

a religion which is firm believer of non violence which even made Ashoka drop his sword has today picked guns .

And  we the so called martial race , display chhatti parkaar ke shastr has become so pussied out. 

godd xD 

The Rohingyas started the violence and then cried like a bunch of spoiled brats when the Buddhists fought back.

Muslims are always the aggressors. They have a sense of arrogance thinking that if they start trouble the other side will do nothing. They do this even when they are in small numbers.

The muslim Rohingyas also massacred the Hindu ones.

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2018/05/myanmar-new-evidence-reveals-rohingya-armed-group-massacred-scores-in-rakhine-state/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, puzzled said:

Yh that's so true! It was in the pubjab region and neighbouring areas where we saved hindus and defeated muslims.

The whole sikhs saved hinduism from extinction is silly! I never understood y some sikhs say that! 

But that being said we were the first ones to face the invading Afghans every time they entered india 

All of India is indeed saved by the Sikhs. According to historian Hari Ram Gupta, during the 1700s, the Sikhs in Punjab acted as an iron wall preventing central Asian warriors from replenishing Indian Muslim armies with fresh blood throughout India. This resulted in weakening of their armies since this lowered the quality of their soldiers that they hired. Marathas will 1761 were flush with victory because until then they were fighting largely weak Indian Muslims. But in 1961 at Panipat  when they finally fought some authentic central Asian warriors they were destroyed even though the Marathas had every advantage over the Afghans including better artillery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Jonny101 said:

Brahmkavach is the shortest. Only takes about a minute. Chandi Di Vaar is about the size of Japji Sahib(ਜਪੁਜੀ ਸਾਹਿਬ).

Then Chandi Charitar 2 is much larger, more than double the size of Jaap Sahib(ਜਾਪ ਸਾਹਿਬ). Chandi Charitar 1 is the longest of these, it is more than 3 times the size of Jaap Sahib(ਜਾਪ ਸਾਹਿਬ). First time I read these it took a long time. But now my reading of these Banis has improved and takes less time.

Paji I read Chandi Di Vaar and Brahm Kavch. Took me a bit of time reading Chandi di Vaar  but really liked reading both    going to read it everyday now.

But chandi di vaar we are supposed to read it read before six pm? I read sant Harnam Singh jis   se kineya once and it said that. 

Brahm kavch is written by Guru Hargobind sahib? That was a bit of a surprise. 

Some people online are saying you read it 32 times? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ChardikalaUK said:

The Rohingyas started the violence and then cried like a bunch of spoiled brats when the Buddhists fought back.

Muslims are always the aggressors. They have a sense of arrogance thinking that if they start trouble the other side will do nothing. They do this even when they are in small numbers.

The muslim Rohingyas also massacred the Hindu ones.

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2018/05/myanmar-new-evidence-reveals-rohingya-armed-group-massacred-scores-in-rakhine-state/

Thats quite interesting, I always knew the royingha had militant group before their ethnic cleansing from burma but didnt know they started the violent attacks on the state authorities and on the Burmese hindu's.

To be fair the royingha were there in burma land area before the british rulers got there and created the burmese borders, that land was always under nomadic hindu/muslim control and became part of british india with no proper defined fenced off borders this is why their claims to the land was easily dismissed by the majority buddhist burmese as the rohingya didnt establish their own nation state before and after british rule ended from what i read.

The retaliation by the burmese army and police was pretty brutal I saw videos of villagers being shot dead chucked in shallow graves and then set on fire. The buddhists didnt waste no time in clearing and killing the muslims from that land. I guess they were pretty comfortable knowing no international army force would come to confront them and especially as their muslim neighbour bangladesh would not intervene since they they have their own problems to deal with and no match for the buddhist military dictatorship state of burma.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use