Jump to content

Allah shows his mercy on Derby Gurudwara by attacking it today


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, AjeetSingh2019 said:

GOOD LORD ! IRONY DIED A MILLION DEaTHS !

a religion which is firm believer of non violence which even made Ashoka drop his sword has today picked guns .

And  we the so called martial race , display chhatti parkaar ke shastr has become so pussied out. 

godd xD 

One of the funniest things I've heard in recent times is when someone said regarding the Rohingya issue: "How f*****g unbearable must a religion and its followers (Islam) be, that it forces BUDDHISTS to become militant in order to reassert themselves?"

Lmao, the media only ever presents the results of the fightback, yet why do they never broach the reasons for why a group like the Buddhists had to resort to those means? 

And why is it only where there's a growing Muslim population in a country where they are a minority -- as they edge closer to that magic 10% population mark -- where these things happen?  It's almost as if the response to Islamic encroachment arises because Muslims decide to instigate the next part of their plan once they've reached a certain demographical number where they feel they can "affect" matters in society... hmmmm....

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 178
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

thats great!   now they just need to learn some of this   

Rise of the easy access always on internet/social media and sheeple herd mentality bro. There's more distractions taking away our focus these days so easy to get distracted and attention span get

i think it will, tensions are rising. I think we will hear about a clash soon, that too in a gurdwara.  like when some man was going to organize vaisakhi at a mosque and singhs made sure that it didnt

Posted Images

3 hours ago, AjeetSingh2019 said:

 

GOOD LORD ! IRONY DIED A MILLION DEaTHS !

 

a religion which is firm believer of non violence which even made Ashoka drop his sword has today picked guns .

And  we the so called martial race , display chhatti parkaar ke shastr has become so pussied out. 

godd xD 

The Rohingyas started the violence and then cried like a bunch of spoiled brats when the Buddhists fought back.

Muslims are always the aggressors. They have a sense of arrogance thinking that if they start trouble the other side will do nothing. They do this even when they are in small numbers.

The muslim Rohingyas also massacred the Hindu ones.

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2018/05/myanmar-new-evidence-reveals-rohingya-armed-group-massacred-scores-in-rakhine-state/

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, puzzled said:

Yh that's so true! It was in the pubjab region and neighbouring areas where we saved hindus and defeated muslims.

The whole sikhs saved hinduism from extinction is silly! I never understood y some sikhs say that! 

But that being said we were the first ones to face the invading Afghans every time they entered india 

All of India is indeed saved by the Sikhs. According to historian Hari Ram Gupta, during the 1700s, the Sikhs in Punjab acted as an iron wall preventing central Asian warriors from replenishing Indian Muslim armies with fresh blood throughout India. This resulted in weakening of their armies since this lowered the quality of their soldiers that they hired. Marathas will 1761 were flush with victory because until then they were fighting largely weak Indian Muslims. But in 1961 at Panipat  when they finally fought some authentic central Asian warriors they were destroyed even though the Marathas had every advantage over the Afghans including better artillery.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Jonny101 said:

Brahmkavach is the shortest. Only takes about a minute. Chandi Di Vaar is about the size of Japji Sahib(ਜਪੁਜੀ ਸਾਹਿਬ).

Then Chandi Charitar 2 is much larger, more than double the size of Jaap Sahib(ਜਾਪ ਸਾਹਿਬ). Chandi Charitar 1 is the longest of these, it is more than 3 times the size of Jaap Sahib(ਜਾਪ ਸਾਹਿਬ). First time I read these it took a long time. But now my reading of these Banis has improved and takes less time.

Paji I read Chandi Di Vaar and Brahm Kavch. Took me a bit of time reading Chandi di Vaar  but really liked reading both    going to read it everyday now.

But chandi di vaar we are supposed to read it read before six pm? I read sant Harnam Singh jis   se kineya once and it said that. 

Brahm kavch is written by Guru Hargobind sahib? That was a bit of a surprise. 

Some people online are saying you read it 32 times? 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, ChardikalaUK said:

The Rohingyas started the violence and then cried like a bunch of spoiled brats when the Buddhists fought back.

Muslims are always the aggressors. They have a sense of arrogance thinking that if they start trouble the other side will do nothing. They do this even when they are in small numbers.

The muslim Rohingyas also massacred the Hindu ones.

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2018/05/myanmar-new-evidence-reveals-rohingya-armed-group-massacred-scores-in-rakhine-state/

Thats quite interesting, I always knew the royingha had militant group before their ethnic cleansing from burma but didnt know they started the violent attacks on the state authorities and on the Burmese hindu's.

To be fair the royingha were there in burma land area before the british rulers got there and created the burmese borders, that land was always under nomadic hindu/muslim control and became part of british india with no proper defined fenced off borders this is why their claims to the land was easily dismissed by the majority buddhist burmese as the rohingya didnt establish their own nation state before and after british rule ended from what i read.

The retaliation by the burmese army and police was pretty brutal I saw videos of villagers being shot dead chucked in shallow graves and then set on fire. The buddhists didnt waste no time in clearing and killing the muslims from that land. I guess they were pretty comfortable knowing no international army force would come to confront them and especially as their muslim neighbour bangladesh would not intervene since they they have their own problems to deal with and no match for the buddhist military dictatorship state of burma.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, genie said:

Thats quite interesting, I always knew the royingha had militant group before their ethnic cleansing from burma but didnt know they started the violent attacks on the state authorities and on the Burmese hindu's.

To be fair the royingha were there in burma land area before the british rulers got there and created the burmese borders, that land was always under nomadic hindu/muslim control and became part of british india with no proper defined fenced off borders this is why their claims to the land was easily dismissed by the majority buddhist burmese as the rohingya didnt establish their own nation state before and after british rule ended from what i read.

The retaliation by the burmese army and police was pretty brutal I saw videos of villagers being shot dead chucked in shallow graves and then set on fire. The buddhists didnt waste no time in clearing and killing the muslims from that land. I guess they were pretty comfortable knowing no international army force would come to confront them and especially as their muslim neighbour bangladesh would not intervene since they they have their own problems to deal with and no match for the buddhist military dictatorship state of burma.

I think it is a myth that Buddhists are docile. 

That is the perception the west always has.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

I think it is a myth that Buddhists are docile. 

That is the perception the west always has.

I think only Muslims are capable of turning peaceful Buddhist monks towards violence as we saw in Burma. 

While I don't condone what has happened to the Rohingya, but not too long ago I read on a website which listed each and every violent crime the Rohingya did towards the Buddhists. These crimes included murder, rape, looting, violent crimes which resulted in Buddhists moving out of Muslim areas. It went on for years with no reaction from the Buddhists until finally a Buddhist monk decided enough is enough. 

Although the Rohingya started it but seeing the videos of their suffering, you can't help but be moved and feel bad for them. The Burmese went a little too far in their retaliation. I mean there are videos of the rohingya being burnt alive, their women have been gang raped by the Burmese soldiers. Rohingya are basically Bangalis who migrated there in the last century or so. But Bangladesh refuses to take them in.

Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Jonny101 said:

I think only Muslims are capable of turning peaceful Buddhist monks towards violence as we saw in Burma. 

While I don't condone what has happened to the Rohingya, but not too long ago I read on a website which listed each and every violent crime the Rohingya did towards the Buddhists. These crimes included murder, rape, looting, violent crimes which resulted in Buddhists moving out of Muslim areas. It went on for years with no reaction from the Buddhists until finally a Buddhist monk decided enough is enough. 

Although the Rohingya started it but seeing the videos of there suffering, you can't help but be moved and feel bad for them. The Burmese went a little too far in their retaliation. I mean there are videos of the rohingya being burnt alive, their women have been gang raped by the Burmese soldiers. Rohingya are basically Bangalis who migrated there in the last century or so. But Bangladesh refuses to take them in.

You know if the present day buddhists were around in afghanistan before they lost it to islamic arab invaders i dont think the jihadis would have stood a chance. The buddhists of today are far more militant and extreme they have a crazy nationalist mindset same with Sinhalese buddhists of sri lanka when they fought with the sri lankan  hindu tamils both were as vicious as each other.

This idea that we have of the peaceful buddhist is probably misplaced even their docile monks are quite militant. We just need to look at our own history during khalsa raj when the Sikh army researched ladkh and wanted to take tibet they faced quite strong opposition from the buddhist Tibetan troops. Both sides eventually called a truce and signed a treaty i believe respecting each others boundaries and borders. Which to this day that treaty is used by china to lay claim to various parts of tibet and india as inheritors of that land. ( sources: The Sino-Indian Border Disputes, by Alfred P. Rubin, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 1. (Jan. 1960), pp. 96–125.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Indian_border_dispute)

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Jonny101 said:

I think only Muslims are capable of turning peaceful Buddhist monks towards violence as we saw in Burma. 

While I don't condone what has happened to the Rohingya, but not too long ago I read on a website which listed each and every violent crime the Rohingya did towards the Buddhists. These crimes included murder, rape, looting, violent crimes which resulted in Buddhists moving out of Muslim areas. It went on for years with no reaction from the Buddhists until finally a Buddhist monk decided enough is enough. 

Although the Rohingya started it but seeing the videos of their suffering, you can't help but be moved and feel bad for them. The Burmese went a little too far in their retaliation. I mean there are videos of the rohingya being burnt alive, their women have been gang raped by the Burmese soldiers. Rohingya are basically Bangalis who migrated there in the last century or so. But Bangladesh refuses to take them in.

This seems to be the usual routine for any non-muslim group that retaliates against muslims.

That is only reacting after much provocation. 

The western media likes to pick up in the aftermath. They deliberately turn a blind eye.

They are like those WWE wrestling referees that disqualify the good guy after seeing him hit the bad guy with the chair but completely miss what is happening before. 

Usually non-muslims tend to be reactive. Maybe it is time to be pro-active. 

We know muslims are not a net benefit for any community as a whole. The more there are, the more problematic they are.

I think we understand their nature.

What we need are steps to counter them.

For instance Rohingyas should be given a choice to convert to Buddhism (probably was their religion before they converted) or else.

Then find out the clerics and the people who stir up the problems. 

One of the things I notice is that whenever the muslim mob goes on the rampage, there tends to be a cleric in the background that gets away scot free.

Their communities are mullah-Centric.  Take out their clerics, their mobs will collapse.

Their population growth needs to be countered.  They love to breed exponentially as a way to take over an area.

If a muslim family has more than say two kids, their kids should be taken from them and converted to Buddhism. 

The other problem is the bleeding heart non muslims who will object to this (though understandeable) but inadvertently cause their own demise.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

18 hours ago, genie said:

You know if the present day buddhists were around in afghanistan before they lost it to islamic arab invaders i dont think the jihadis would have stood a chance. The buddhists of today are far more militant and extreme they have a crazy nationalist mindset same with Sinhalese buddhists of sri lanka when they fought with the sri lankan  hindu tamils both were as vicious as each other.

 

You make a valid point. If the ancient Afghan Buddhists had been like this there is no way Islam would have taken root in their land. The problem with these Abrahamic religions is that they hate Dharmic religions to the core. That is why you see some modern missionary influenced Khalistanis like Udoke and Makhu who try to Abrahamize Sikhism in order to make it more palatable for there Muslim friends.

Currently Sikhs in India are opening up their doors to the Abrahamics and you can see how Christianity has spread all over Punjab. Even Islam is once again taking root in Punjab thanks to Sikhs building mosques for them and giving our Gurdwaras to be used as semi Mosques where they can come and do there Namaz and celebrate Eid which as we all know is against Gur Maryadha.

Of course some Sikhs partly do this moorkhta to annoy Hindus by showing closeness to Muslims and Christians. But you don't have you shoot yourself in the foot to annoy Hindus as we are doing now.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

This seems to be the usual routine for any non-muslim group that retaliates against muslims.

That is only reacting after much provocation. 

The western media likes to pick up in the aftermath. They deliberately turn a blind eye.

They are like those WWE wrestling referees that disqualify the good guy after seeing him hit the bad guy with the chair but completely miss what is happening before. 

Usually non-muslims tend to be reactive. Maybe it is time to be pro-active. 

We know muslims are not a net benefit for any community as a whole. The more there are, the more problematic they are.

I think we understand their nature.

What we need are steps to counter them.

For instance Rohingyas should be given a choice to convert to Buddhism (probably was their religion before they converted) or else.

Then find out the clerics and the people who stir up the problems. 

One of the things I notice is that whenever the muslim mob goes on the rampage, there tends to be a cleric in the background that gets away scot free.

Their communities are mullah-Centric.  Take out their clerics, their mobs will collapse.

Their population growth needs to be countered.  They love to breed exponentially as a way to take over an area.

If a muslim family has more than say two kids, their kids should be taken from them and converted to Buddhism. 

The other problem is the bleeding heart non muslims who will object to this (though understandeable) but inadvertently cause their own demise.

That is what we did in 1947 and we hit them back very hard.

They are so cocky even when in a minority. It seems that they only respect you if you give them a good beating.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ChardikalaUK said:

That is what we did in 1947 and we hit them back very hard.

They are so cocky even when in a minority. It seems that they only respect you if you give them a good beating.

Majority of Sikhs in West cant get over the Sanjha Punjab fantasy ...you'd only see apne cucks Sikh crying about united Panjab esp when it comes to Independence day on India and Pakistan and they'll cry on about Muslims Hindus Sikhs lived together and this romantic love affair that was  divided by British etc...mean while Pakistanis and Indians are wetting themselves on Independence day for both countries. So pathetic..If we want our own Sikh country, it should be Sikh Ruling country only and foremost, just like Hindus have India Muslims have Pakistan, yet only crybabies apne cant get over their Sanjha Punjab...

image.png.751c7d6de45d58733c2714366f5b3765.png

He's Pashtun Pakistani i think and he talks about how Sikhi and Gurus are influencedby  Mughuls and Sikhi exits because Islam etc Once he started having a meltdown how Bollywood was portraying Ahmad shah abdali lol and sly digs at Sikh empire....just sucks we'd now ping pong between Ind and Pak 

image.png.67eb861f283020242b3953607838ac55.png

image.png.8602dcdfc66930a3ed1abe52683f260b.png

image.png.27ff10f86c55bb1f29a197f7408b60f9.png

image.png.012928fb36b54fedb31a37015e40ff83.png

image.png.2eb5873584e5d26d6c1bb8df68323ed5.png

image.png.b7309b5d2ef149a6a44f6082fe5df84d.png

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ChardikalaUK said:

That is what we did in 1947 and we hit them back very hard.

They are so cocky even when in a minority. It seems that they only respect you if you give them a good beating.

They need to be given a consistent beating to keep them under control because the moment you show leniency they go back to the old routine.

That is why it is important to go after their clerics, you have to demoralise, show them that allah is not on their side.

Get them to leave the political doctrine.

But simultaneously their needs to be punishment for the enemy within, who will try to facilitate your demise.

There has never been any punishment from treachery, an example needs to be made treachery will not be tolerated.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Kau89r8 said:

Majority of Sikhs in West cant get over the Sanjha Punjab fantasy ...you'd only see apne cucks Sikh crying about united Panjab esp when it comes to Independence day on India and Pakistan and they'll cry on about Muslims Hindus Sikhs lived together and this romantic love affair that was  divided by British etc...mean while Pakistanis and Indians are wetting themselves on Independence day for both countries. So pathetic..If we want our own Sikh country, it should be Sikh Ruling country only and foremost, just like Hindus have India Muslims have Pakistan, yet only crybabies apne cant get over their Sanjha Punjab...

image.png.751c7d6de45d58733c2714366f5b3765.png

He's Pashtun Pakistani i think and he talks about how Sikhi and Gurus are influencedby  Mughuls and Sikhi exits because Islam etc Once he started having a meltdown how Bollywood was portraying Ahmad shah abdali lol and sly digs at Sikh empire....just sucks we'd now ping pong between Ind and Pak 

image.png.67eb861f283020242b3953607838ac55.png

image.png.8602dcdfc66930a3ed1abe52683f260b.png

Mucho Libre never ruled for half millenia.

They were even more conquered and colonised than the kafirs

All they did was switch sides

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use