Jump to content

Islamic genocide of Hindustan


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Jonny101 said:

The heroic Sikh resistance became a mere footnote, while whole chapters are dedicated to the greatness of Mughal emperors

Hindu right wing in india is totally up in arms over mughal romaniticism 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, AjeetSingh2019 said:

Hindu right wing in india is totally up in arms over mughal romaniticism 

As they should be. During the 60s and 70s there was a big influx of left wing Marxists into the academia of India who wrote very positively of Islamic invasions, hide the atrocities and glorify their oppressive rule. Examples of these Marxist academics are Romila Thapar.

Marxists no matter in which community they come from are the enemies of their own community.

-Hindu Marxists are anti Hindu and even anti Sikh if the Sikhs appear to be fighting on the side of the Hindus against Muslims. They are extremely pro Muslim.

-Sikh communists also popularly known as Kaamreds(ਕਾਮਰੇਡ) are anti Sikh to the core. But politically they are very pro Muslim and pro Hindu. After 1978 they openly chose to side with the Nirankaris, Hindus and the oppressive Indian government. Since the mid 90s many of these kaamreds have infiltrated Sikhs by becoming Sikh missionaries where they try to undermine Sikhism through their atheistic arguments. Dasam Bani is there favourite target.

-Muslim leftists and Marxists which can be found in Pakistan are anti Muslim but very pro Hindu and surprisingly even pro Sikh. Najam Sethi and Hasan Nissar are examples of such leftist Muslims.

Of these three Marxists/leftists the Pakistani Muslim ones are the only leftists/Marxists I have a positive view on. They are the only ones who legitimately make any sense of the three.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jonny101 said:

As they should be. During the 60s and 70s there was a big influx of left wing Marxists into the academia of India who wrote very positively of Islamic invasions, hide the atrocities and glorify their oppressive rule. Examples of these Marxist academics are Romila Thapar.

Marxists no matter in which community they come from are the enemies of their own community.

-Hindu Marxists are anti Hindu and even anti Sikh if the Sikhs appear to be fighting on the side of the Hindus against Muslims. They are extremely pro Muslim.

-Sikh communists also popularly known as Kaamreds(ਕਾਮਰੇਡ) are anti Sikh to the core. But politically they are very pro Muslim and pro Hindu. After 1978 they openly chose to side with the Nirankaris, Hindus and the oppressive Indian government. Since the mid 90s many of these kaamreds have infiltrated Sikhs by becoming Sikh missionaries where they try to undermine Sikhism through their atheistic arguments. Dasam Bani is there favourite target.

-Muslim leftists and Marxists which can be found in Pakistan are anti Muslim but very pro Hindu and surprisingly even pro Sikh. Najam Sethi and Hasan Nissar are examples of such leftist Muslims.

Of these three Marxists/leftists the Pakistani Muslim ones are the only leftists/Marxists I have a positive view on. They are the only ones who legitimately make any sense of the three.

The people you are referring to are a Cultural Marxists. They are the type to believe that race, ethnicity, culture and religion are all handmaidens for Capitalist exploitation and thus, in each and every society, it must be checked by working against the cultural mainstream and establishment of said country.

I am an economic Marxist, or at least left-leaning economically, and thus despise these people.

Their thinking is fundamentally asinine. It is *they* who push for Pro-Islam BS in Western Academia and media. In India they do the same thing regarding Islamic imperialism and European colonialism. 

Instead of being proud of the fact that Marathi Hindus, Assamese Hindus and Punjabi Sikhs defeated Islamic hegemony and catalyzed the Indian subcontinent’s “Reconquista”, they choose to promote the idea that the Mughals were benevolent rulers. They aren’t idiots, so why do they do this? Because if you promote the idea that Islam is a boon to India, the average Hindu or non-Muslim in India today won’t reflect on history and work against Islam and Muslim supremacist endeavours.

Instead of being proud and highlighting the South Indian Hindu military victories decisively ending Dutch Colonialism, halting Portuguese Expansionism and fighting so hard against British Imperialism well into the 19th century - they seek promote the notion that all things European and Christian are good and not to be resisted, and that the Indians of the yesteryear knew this to be true hence why they never resisted. This is why Cultural Marxists are so keen on protecting Evangelization efforts by foreign missionaries. They know that Christians won’t replace Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists demographically in their lifetimes - but if the native religious communities of the subcontinent get away from their culture and heritage and feel themselves fragmented, that’s a win for their Cultural Marxist framework and MO.

In the West and Europe, it’s precisely the reverse. The Cultural Marxist wants to destroy European heritage and institutions and promote multiculturalism in order to stand against ethnic nationalism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
1 hour ago, Premi5 said:

Is it likely that ‘victims’ during this time (who didn’t become shaheed but became slaves or converted) were being punished for past karma? 

We need to reconsider the idea that karma is exclusively a conduit for punishment. It's as much a method of learning for the positive improvement and growth of the part of us that never dies (and enters a new body), as it is for giving naughty boys and girls their comeuppance.

When we go to school to learn, is that a punishment? Of course not (although it may feel like it for some ?). 

Admittedly, the one thing that most people struggle with is the idea that we must suffer in order to learn and grow, because some of those lessons we require to evolve spiritually are so very harsh. It seems unfair and excessive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/25/2020 at 4:55 PM, puzzled said:

The savage Turks fell to killing and plundering, while the Hindus set fire to their houses with their own hands, burned their wives and children in them, and rushed into the fight and were killed. The Hindus and infidels of the city showed much alacrity and boldness in fighting.

Wouldn't you consider these Hindu men as Shaheeds? They new odds were against them and that they were gnna get killed, so they turned their wives to ash to save their wives honor and then they ran into battle to die on the battle field. It seems even the Turks were impressed by their courage.

They must of been Rajputs, because when Rajput warriors knew they were gnna die their wives used to set themselves on fire while the men used to run into the battle field to die. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use