Jump to content

How should India govt handle the Chinese army incursion on the border?


genie
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, proactive said:

It's over 20 now according to the news. Let's see if Modi will try a fake surgical strike. That <banned word filter activated> Bikram Singh the former Indian army chief said on TV that the India army should kill 20 PLA soldiers in revenge.. lol.

Shoot you gonna go for revenge go big. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the indian army wants to remove the chinese troops on indian land without using bullets they should use tear gas cannisters and non-lethal anti-personal devices to make life difficult to stay in illegal occupied area's. And if the chinese resort to firing bullets then its game on the indian army can start opening up their own gun's on them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is the Indian govt and pretty much everyone else in Indian establishment is still clueless behind why all of a sudden PLA has decided to intrude into Indian territory or atleast a disputed territory , especially considering Modi and Xi have been "shaking hands", "laughing together", "smiling", "eating together" and kind of such diplomatic facades. 

The plausible various reasons (which I think covers most scenarios) are as follows : 

1) To deter a newly invigorated nationalistic govt from building border roads in remote areas of ladakh to give it cutting edge at par with PLA in the area

2) To show India as a possible ground of war and deter foreign companies leaving China (due to covid) to go to India. By showcasing India as an enemy of India , companies leaving china will be reluctant to move there for obvious reasons

3) India's recent romance with US

4) To distract the growing possible discontent in Chinese population and possibly communist party itself against Xi . Nationalism is a strong binding factor, esp when against an enemy

5) To break the overall morale of the nationalistic bjp govt.

6) This one is deep : Pakistan cajoled China, its all-weather friend, into intruding into India , so that the govt's inability get shown to its public , who then will lose confidence in govt and not vote for them next time . And the possible return of congress or some other "secular" party will help continue the paused islamization agenda of india and crush the hindutva movement. My god this would be deep lol. This one is also plausible due to govt beating the drums about beating pakistan and doing surgical strikes against them and using it brownie points to win electorate.

 

Jokes apart, I live in a prime metro city , and if the push comes to a shove, and things get out of hand , and nuclear options start coming into equation, I fear (and its a very justified one), the chinese might launch something like missile or something against big cities. I PRAY it doesn't come to that. :/ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the flare up was to teach India a lesson just as the Chinese did in 1962. Modi's action in Kashmir as well as stating that he will take back Pakistani Kashmir was bound to either cause a flare up with Pakistan or with China. China occupied Aksai Chin which was a part of Ladakh and which China took in 1962. Modi's sabre rattling bought this flare up and now he has to either put up or shut up. China holds all the cards, their military is better trained and better motivated than any of the bhaiyas India can send against them. China will win any border war and Modi knows this. Taiwan, Japan, Phillipines and Australia won't do anything apart from give statements of support to India. Trump is in the pocket of the Wall St globalists who make billions out of China so although he may make noises against China he knows that he needs Wall St to win him the next election. He also knows that his core followers do not  want any foreign wars so he will just put sanctions on China and sell some outdated weapons to India but little else. India will be all alone if there is a border war and there is no doubt that if there is a border war, Pakistan will ramp up shelling in Jammu and send more terrorists into Kashmir. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, proactive said:

I think the flare up was to teach India a lesson just as the Chinese did in 1962. Modi's action in Kashmir as well as stating that he will take back Pakistani Kashmir was bound to either cause a flare up with Pakistan or with China. China occupied Aksai Chin which was a part of Ladakh and which China took in 1962. Modi's sabre rattling bought this flare up and now he has to either put up or shut up. China holds all the cards, their military is better trained and better motivated than any of the bhaiyas India can send against them. China will win any border war and Modi knows this. Taiwan, Japan, Phillipines and Australia won't do anything apart from give statements of support to India. Trump is in the pocket of the Wall St globalists who make billions out of China so although he may make noises against China he knows that he needs Wall St to win him the next election. He also knows that his core followers do not  want any foreign wars so he will just put sanctions on China and sell some outdated weapons to India but little else. India will be all alone if there is a border war and there is no doubt that if there is a border war, Pakistan will ramp up shelling in Jammu and send more terrorists into Kashmir. 

when will Taliban join in this mess?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
    • Good way of putting it, bro. One of the ongoing themes of Gurbani is the fake saint. Whether it's fake babas in Punjab or English-speaking personalities in the West, it's an continuing problem of religion through the centuries (and it's not exclusive to us by any means, this applies to all human societies).
    • First of all, while it's true that Gurbani says slandering a Saint has such-and-such effects, you can't do the reverse: You can't look and your situation and know for certain what caused it. We're not encouraged to mope over our situations but rather to accept the hukam (will). The last line of the very first pauri of Japji Sahib says to live in hukam: ਹੁਕਮਿ ਰਜਾਈ ਚਲਣਾ ਨਾਨਕ ਲਿਖਿਆ ਨਾਲਿ ॥੧॥ hukam rajāī chalanā nānak likhiā nāl .1. O Nanak! By obeying, the pre-ordained order of the Lord's will. Secondly, the astpadhi from which you quoted the Sant ka dokhi verses has this verse at the end: ਜਿਸ ਨੋ ਕ੍ਰਿਪਾ ਕਰੈ ਤਿਸੁ ਆਪਨ ਨਾਮੁ ਦੇਇ ॥ jis nō kripā karai tis āpan nām dēi . God gives His Name to those unto whom He shows His mercy. So ask for his mercy. Also check out the 7th Astpadi, which talks about the good effects of the sangat of a Sadhu: https://khojgurbani.com/shabad/271/709?highlighted_scripture_id=12007&highlighted_scripture_lang=gurmukhi&selected_content=gurbani I'm not getting into who is a "true" Sadhu in this post.
    • In langar it should be common sense for peopel to find a suitable space to sit. Normally in my local Singh Sabha gurdwara, there is enough space to sit, so I am able to find a space with enough space away from other people. There have been a few times, where there has been a lot of sangat and I have been forced onto a table.  In Slough and Southall Singh Sabha, Park Avenue, I will just sit near another group of men unless I am with family, but again there shouldn't be strict gender separation and instead common sense logic.
    • Yeh I could do to be honest. It's not really chardikala to be coming from the diwan hall and then sangat putting on shoes to go langar. I like sitting in the gurdwara with family, and there are spaces for this in bigger gurdwaras such as Slough, Southall, Coventry. In my current local area gurdwaras this is not really possible for weekly sangat, and also not for sangrand and gurpurb. Need to complain about these tendikalaUK practices  to be UK chardikala Singhs! 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use