Jump to content

‘False flag’ events


Premi5
 Share

Recommended Posts

This last weekend in the Uk, in Reading which is not far from London there were 3 people killed by someone originally from Libya who has ‘-allah’ at the end of his name.

one of the dead is an American. The other one looks like he could have been gay

It looks well staged to me to maximise public outcry .

Could I be right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were radical muslims who do what they do best. Iv been reading 100s of times, it's always very busy, the Oracle shopping centre close at like 8pm. The high street is always busy. 

The government in this country is clueless, it just doesnt know how to deal with these people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, puzzled said:

Pakistan PM Imran Khan just called Osama Bin Laden a Shaheed in parliament! Check the news out. He only said what a big % of muslims feel and believe deep down. 

"Elite" Muslims in positions of power and authority know Bin Laden was a scapegoat. They push the "shaheed" narrative to keep the masses somewhat united and rallying against their enemies. I also don't believe he was Hitler 2.0. I think it was more way more complex than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

"Elite" Muslims in positions of power and authority know Bin Laden was a scapegoat. They push the "shaheed" narrative to keep the masses somewhat united and rallying against their enemies. I also don't believe he was Hitler 2.0. I think it was more way more complex than that.

i watched this documentary about Imran Khan and the blasphemy law, and to become PM he knew he had to get the radical Mullahs on his side and please them, he actually supports the blasphemy law and it helped him get the mullahs on his side, interestingly once he did become PM he arrested some of the very Mullahs that supported him! but shortly released them. Its things like this that demonstrate how Islam is used to keep the masses in line and for political gain, it all works hand in hand. BJP seem to be using similar tactics. 

Why he allowed the kartarpur corridor is confusing though, i can imagine it drove the mullahs up the wall, and modi had to accept the corridor and go ahead with it to keep face, maybe it was imrans way of sticking 2 fingers up at modi! lol      either way Sikh interests and feelings are definitely not in both the countries interests, so the corridor is something else.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, puzzled said:

Why he allowed the kartarpur corridor is confusing though, i can imagine it drove the mullahs up the wall, and modi had to accept the corridor and go ahead with it to keep face, maybe it was imrans way of sticking 2 fingers up at modi! lol      either way Sikh interests and feelings are definitely not in both the countries interests, so the corridor is something else.  

To annoy India by making Indian Sikhs think, "Why does Pakistan prioritise our religious interests whereas India, which is supposedly our natural "home", treat us as an afterthought?" It forcibly widens an already gaping chasm between India and its Sikhs. There's no genuine affection for Sikhs or respect for our religion in the Pakistani establishment. It's a geo-political chess move on the part of Pakistan, and we are the pawns. Subsequently, India is now burdened with a significant part of the Sikh population that now views Pakistan with cordiality due to the Kartarpur corridor situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

To annoy India by making Indian Sikhs think, "Why does Pakistan prioritise our religious interests whereas India, which is supposedly our natural "home", treat us as an afterthought?" It forcibly widens an already gaping chasm between India and its Sikhs. There's no genuine affection for Sikhs or respect for our religion in the Pakistani establishment. It's a geo-political chess move on the part of Pakistan, and we are the pawns. Subsequently, India is now burdened with a significant part of the Sikh population that now views Pakistan with cordiality due to the Kartarpur corridor situation. 

I guess it also gave Pakistan and Imran that much needed fake secular image in the Media.

Punjab churning out Sikh/Muslim friendship videos doesn't help either, just creates more delusions in the heads of the simple minded. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

To annoy India by making Indian Sikhs think, "Why does Pakistan prioritise our religious interests whereas India, which is supposedly our natural "home", treat us as an afterthought?" It forcibly widens an already gaping chasm between India and its Sikhs. There's no genuine affection for Sikhs or respect for our religion in the Pakistani establishment. It's a geo-political chess move on the part of Pakistan, and we are the pawns. Subsequently, India is now burdened with a significant part of the Sikh population that now views Pakistan with cordiality due to the Kartarpur corridor situation. 

but what was the end result ? it ended up benefiting us isn't it , by opening the gates for us to have a darshan of our asthan.

When two enemies vie for you , then its your talent and skills about how to leverage the situation for your benefit. There's a lot that sikhs can do , unfortunately our religious moral ethics bind our hands. We could and should have otherwise been 2 steps ahead of others in these games, much like the jews , and could have invaded ourselves discreetly in many places arousing minimal suspicion while doing so 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use