Why do feminists accuse house duties as "being domesticated" , but conveniently think of men as ATM ?

[Sat1]

17 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

And I'm telling you that there are women out there who certainly DO care about those things. The noble minority you refer to have arrived at their magnanimous state of mind because they have NO choice in the matter. Their hand has been forced through circumstances of their own making. Accordingly, they must either accept a lower status male in order to stave off loneliness, or start buying cats. 

No, you are wrong.
 

I’m not speaking to you with regards to this topic anymore because you seem to be extremely prejudiced, and there’s no point. 

[Sat1]

16 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

 

 

A woman does not want to win, she wants a winner. 

 

 

 

 

Wow awesome and not sexist at all. 
 

I am a woman, and I disagree.

[MisterrSingh]

7 hours ago, Sat1 said:

No, you are wrong.
 

I’m not speaking to you with regards to this topic anymore because you seem to be extremely prejudiced, and there’s no point. 

No, you're wrong.

"extremely prejudiced" = presenting information that contradicts your narrative. That makes me evil. 

Women!

[Ranjeet01]

7 hours ago, Sat1 said:

Wow awesome and not sexist at all. 
 

I am a woman, and I disagree.

Disagree all you want.

Your solipsism doesn't carry much weight.

I have learnt long ago not to follow people by what they say but what they do.

[Sat1]

14 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

 

[Sat1]

14 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Disagree all you want.

Your solipsism doesn't carry much weight.

I have learnt long ago not to follow people by what they say but what they do.

“A woman doesn’t want to win, she wants a winner”- your words

I’m open to learning new things and to other people’s opinions, but this one is truly so sexist. Maybe some women don’t want to win, I don’t know, but I know that some do want to win. 

[Ranjeet01]

15 minutes ago, Sat1 said:

“A woman doesn’t want to win, she wants a winner”- your words

I’m open to learning new things and to other people’s opinions, but this one is truly so sexist. Maybe some women don’t want to win, I don’t know, but I know that some do want to win. 

How is it sexist?

Do you actually know what is meant by this?

Is it sexist because you do not what it means or is it some unflattering truth you are unwilling to accept?

[learningkaur]

2 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

How is it sexist?

Do you actually know what is meant by this?

Is it sexist because you do not what it means or is it some unflattering truth you are unwilling to accept?

If Sat is telling you not all women fall under the assumptions that you are making and is clearly offended... then why are you arguing back? Clearly she doesn’t fall under your generalisations, I definitely do not either. You come across like you have a problem with women and authority? I think I read before that your mother believes marrying a girl who stops her education at 16 is best which is an extremely odd and random opinion to have. Have you had a very negative experience with a woman?

This isn’t 1995, it’s 2020. Where I come from, women don’t go to uni thinking about what man they can get as a result of studying, that’s last thing on an 18year olds mind . It also doesn’t mean a woman must be desperate if she marries someone who makes less money than her. Have you conducted some research into the female brain? I doubt it. Perhaps you have experienced girls like this.... perhaps it’s due to sociological factors, eg are you from a low wealth area?  Whether it’s arranged or love, people don’t meet and ask ‘right so how much are you on?’ Someone may say ‘I work in finance’... it could be on 20k or 60k, no one discusses figures. Once you have fallen for someone, you’ve fallen. That’s it. 

I hope you change the way you think of females if you’re ever blessed to have a daughter. 

[GurjantGnostic]

Theres rule and exception. You may be exceptional but it doesn't change the status quo. 

[Ranjeet01]

1 hour ago, learningkaur said:

If Sat is telling you not all women fall under the assumptions that you are making and is clearly offended... then why are you arguing back? Clearly she doesn’t fall under your generalisations, I definitely do not either. You come across like you have a problem with women and authority? I think I read before that your mother believes marrying a girl who stops her education at 16 is best which is an extremely odd and random opinion to have. Have you had a very negative experience with a woman?

This isn’t 1995, it’s 2020. Where I come from, women don’t go to uni thinking about what man they can get as a result of studying, that’s last thing on an 18year olds mind . It also doesn’t mean a woman must be desperate if she marries someone who makes less money than her. Have you conducted some research into the female brain? I doubt it. Perhaps you have experienced girls like this.... perhaps it’s due to sociological factors, eg are you from a low wealth area?  Whether it’s arranged or love, people don’t meet and ask ‘right so how much are you on?’ Someone may say ‘I work in finance’... it could be on 20k or 60k, no one discusses figures. Once you have fallen for someone, you’ve fallen. That’s it. 

I hope you change the way you think of females if you’re ever blessed to have a daughter. 

Please don't use this "if you are bless to have a daughter" because this is putting women on a pedestal. 

The reality is that there are truths whether you like them or not.

I would not like my daughter to dump some decent hard working guy for a richer guy just because he had more money and getting a higher status.

But I know that when my daughter gets married she will look into how much the guy makes, what profession he is in, will her status increase, does he have his own house, does he make more than her. 

Please don't say this particular feature does not exist in a women's nature. Just because you may not act upon it does not mean it doesn't exist.

I could bring you example after example said out of woman's mouth and her actions that someone can connect the dots.

There a truths (unflattering) about men's nature which I don't find it offensive. Now should I say "I would should be blessed to have a son".

Here is a reality about men's nature. There is part of men's nature that if a man could he would have unlimited sexual access to as many women as possible. The reality is that this is not possible for the majority of men. 90 per cent of men at least this is impossible. 

Here is another uncomfortable  reality,  you have more female ancestors than male ancestors and you know why? 

Because throughout human history, human's were never monogamous. 80 percent of men never bred with women because 20 percent of the top tier had access to all the women. Women sexually selected top tier men to have kids with. They shared their men with other women and they preferred that to having a low status man.

That is how the institution of marriage came about with one woman to one man.

There are truths about muslims nature which on another thread which a muslim probably finds offensive. We don't bat an eyelid because we know it is the truth.

It is 2020, equality does not mean putting women on a pedestal. You want privilege.

You are also displaying a behaviour as well that my bhuas directly from their mouths have told me which is unflattering about women and that is they never like to admit to their foibles.